|May 2000 - Return to Complete Index MiddleEast.Org 5/27/00|
Groups, and the Corporate Media Don't Want You to Know!
To receive MER regularly email to INFOMER@MiddleEast.Org
MER WEEKEND READING:
OF COURSE ISRAEL SHOULD PAY REPARATIONS
MID-EAST REALITIES - www.MiddleEast.Org - Washington - 5/27/2000:
Well of course Israel should. But then its not likely Israel will. Israel likes to collect reparations in the billions. It doesn't like to pay out. Yes, as this former Israeli soldier now Sociology Professor in the US says, that's what should happen. But the way today's world is organized, and with the extreme weakness and divisiveness among the Arabs who have been so terribly lead for so long, this isn't the way things are going to happen.
Professor Arad has performed a most thoughtful and courageous service by writing and publishing this article. But even so, he has used numbers that are much too low -- for instance he mentions that "hundreds" were massacred at the Sabra and Shatilla refugee camps in 1982 by Israel's allies. Actually he should have said "thousands" and mentioned that the Israeli army watched the whole horrible affair from look-out posts, lit up the area with search lights, and General Sharon himself met with the "allies" and "authorized" the massacre. We have "war crime" here; not just a cause for "compensation".
But even more lacking it seems is Professor Arad's awareness of where what he rightly advocates leads to. His memory and perspective are apparently too taken up in the moment. He writes about how Israel can achieve a "peaceful border" with Lebanon and he focuses on the period of time that starts when he personally got involved. But once the historical justice and imperative of Israel paying reparations for what it has done becomes established, the real reparations are going to have to go to millions of Palestinians who have suffered far more dispossession, destruction, and torture, than have the Lebanese -- not just the Palestinians in Lebanon but those now scattered throughout the region and in other countries, plus of course those still remaining in the "autonomy" areas and Gaza.
Even so, this is an important article by a very thoughtful person and
one can hope that it could serve as a kind of moral spark to inflame others
One wonders if it will find publication in Hebrew for Israelis to ponder as they should...as they in the end must.
THE NEXT STEP FOR ISRAEL
By James Ron*
[Boston Globe Op Ed page - 5/25]: Many hope that Israel's withdrawal from Lebanon will bring peace to the troubled border. But without acknowledgement of the destruction visited on Lebanon by Israel over the last 32 years, some Lebanese will not forgive and forget. Guerrillas will continue to fire rockets over Israel's northern frontier, triggering retaliations and more fighting. If the international community pushes Israel to acknowledge and compensate its Lebanese victims, however, the hostilities will finally end. I'll take a first step by apologizing for my own misdeeds.
My first Lebanon raid was in 1986. I was a 19-year-old Israeli conscript,
and my paratroop platoon was sent to a village whose name I can't recall.
I provided security for two Lebanese militiamen and their Israeli handler.
We broke down the door of a home, shoved the family aside, and pulled a
middle-aged man outside. After blindfolding him and tying his hands behind
his back, we took him to a secluded alley, forced him to his knees, and
put a gun to his head, threatening to shoot if he
didn't talk. A UN peacekeeper appeared and put an end to that incident, but there was more to come.
The next day we performed a mock execution on a 10-year-old Lebanese boy. We forced his family into the kitchen and dragged him to a nearby orchard. My lieutenant pressed the child's face into the dirt while I jammed my rifle against his skull.
Although the officer threatened to shoot his head off, the boy did not respond, keeping silent even after we threatened to throw him from the roof of his three-story home.
I was a recent transfer from another unit, and my colleagues were more
familiar with the drill. I watched and learned as they blew off doors with
explosives, poured sacks of flour onto dirt floors, scattered utensils,
broke dishes, and rifled through drawers. For days we ransacked the village,
searching for signs of guerrilla presence. The elderly, female, and
young villagers were trapped in their homes,
ordered to observe a 24-hour curfew. Their men were gathered in a central square, blindfolded, and hauled off for questioning. When another soldier and I expressed reservations, we were ridiculed by our colleagues. More often than not, however, we thought little about the villagers we were tormenting.
Casual brutality was not limited to lower-income recruits. Omri, child
of an intelligence officer, liked to fire bursts toward villagers peeking
through doorways. Rafi, son of a liberal parliamentarian, kicked a cup
of hot tea into an elderly man's face. Several were from kibbutzim, others
from middle-class families, and our lieutenant was devoutly religious.
We were one of the standing army's elite and
My experience was a small part of a long-running conflict. During the 1947-49 war, more than 750,000 Palestinians lost their homes to the new Israeli state, and many fled to Lebanon. In the late 1960s, Palestinian guerrillas began raids from Lebanon, provoking powerful retaliations.
After their main Jordanian base was crushed in 1971, Lebanon became a center of guerrilla activity. Palestinian attacks killed 332 Israelis between 1967 and July 1982. In return, Israel killed 5,000-6,000 Lebanese and Palestinians. The fighting helped trigger a 15-year Lebanese civil war that claimed 75,000-120,000 lives.
During the 1970s, Israeli shelling emptied dozens of villages and drove an estimated 300,000 civilians into Beirut's slums. Northern Christian militias received Israeli arms and training, while Syria supplied Israel's opponents. In the south, Israeli-paid gunmen acted as informants, interrogators, and enforcers. Israel's strategy was to disrupt Palestinian guerrillas by punishing the surrounding Lebanese population; the result was deeply felt Lebanese anger.
Israel invaded in 1982 to end Palestinian political ambitions. Jewish nationalists were eager to annex the West Bank and Gaza, and many believed this first required smashing the Palestinians' Lebanon base. One goal of the invasion, later publicized by Israeli journalists, was to deport Palestinian refugees from Lebanon with Christian militia help. The plan later collapsed, along with Israel's other grand designs.
During the invasion's first months, Israel killed 12,000-15,000 persons and lost 360. Although the Israeli casualties were combatants, most of their victims were civilians. Israel pounded Palestinian camps and Lebanese slums to drive the guerrillas out, turning neighborhoods into rubble.
Israel's allies doubled as death squads, massacring hundreds in Tel
el-Zatar, Sabra, Shatila, el-Khiam, and elsewhere. Palestinian fighters
were eventually driven from Beirut, but Israeli brutality helped create
new enemies. Islamist fighters began to attack Israeli troops and fire
rockets into Israel, stimulating further reprisals. When Jewish civilians
were forced into shelters, journalists diligently conveyed
their suffering. They did not give Israel's victims equal attention, however. With television dwelling on Israeli rather than Lebanese pain, the more plentiful Israeli-induced casualties became remote statistics.
How do nations move beyond such conflicts? Recent history suggests that political deals are not enough, and that truth-telling is vital. Consider South Africa, where a commission requires former abusers to acknowledge their crimes in return for amnesty.
Or consider El Salvador and Guatemala, where commissions have publicized
definitive accounts of official wrong-doing, helping the political healing.
The international community has advocated reconciliation through truth-telling
and accountability in Argentina, Congo, Cambodia, Chad, Chile, Indonesia,
Rwanda, the former Yugoslavia, and now Sierra Leone. In these and other
cases, war termination can be helped by
official recognition of victims' pain, apologies, and compensation. Why should Lebanon be different?
If Israel wants a peaceful border, it must do more than withdraw from a mess it helped create. Palestinians and Lebanese languishing in camps and slums still harbor great bitterness toward Israel. If it wants to end this anger, Israel should recognize and compensate those it harmed. If Israel will not do so on its own, the international community should pressure it to do so. If other countries can face up to their unpleasant pasts, why not Israel?
Let me begin by asking forgiveness from the 10-year-old whose name I never knew and from the village whose name I no longer remember.
* James Ron, is now an assistant professor of sociology at Johns
Hopkins University, and a field investigator for international
human rights groups.
Copyright © Mid-East Realities
& The Committee On The Middle East.