BOTTOM
LINE: STINGING THE ARABS
AND SCREWING THE PALESTINIANS
MER - Washington - 12 May 1998:
Bottom Line: The Israelis could now
agree to every word the Americans are
proposing in the "negotiations" and
they would be the big winners, the
Palestinians the big losers. It's
just the Middle East diplomacy version
of the old "Sting". And if you don't
know what this is all about, head on
over to Blockbuster's and get Robert
Redford's classic movie of the same name.
Politics in America is a most convoluted thing
these days; and Middle
East diplomacy is indeed the hall of distorted
mirrors as we have
repeatedly pointed out.
The notion, propagated widely these days for transparently
self-serving
reasons, that Washington is now on the side of
the Palestinians -- after
half a century of severe anti-Palestinian policies
and at a time when more
Israeli/Jewish lobby officials are in leading
positions in the U.S.
government than in all previous American governments
combined -- is simply
preposterous.
But just pick up the main newspapers and switch
on the regular TV programs
and one would be inclined toward believing this
ludicrous notion. The major
media have transformed Middle East affairs into
a kind of fairy tale
disneyland -- something more fit for children's
consumption than for
serious people who know history and want to understand
contemporary affairs.
Lesson #1 these days: Always remember that
imagery has replaced reality,
posturing has replaced substance, expediency
has replaced principles.
Lesson #2 these days: The everyday media
is much more an appendage of
governments and associated interests groups than
an independent source of
information, not to mention critical analysis.
Especially when it comes to
foreign policy, and especially when the foreign
policy relates to matters
Middle Eastern, much of the press has become
a complicitous agent working
in tandem with think-tanks, lobbying groups,
and on-board "experts" and
"scholars", nearly all of whom are associated
with governments or their
funded associations in one way or another.
Though these lessons apply nearly universally
in our modern world, the
situation in the U.S. regarding matters Middle
Eastern is the worst of
all. For even a glimpse at reality, rather
than hype and deception, one
has to at least turn to the foreign media (especially
the English-language
U.K. press), better yet to the major academics
(such as Chomsky and Said)
who rarely (and never consistently) are allowed
to appear in the daily
media on these subjects.
Bottom Line: The very notion that the U.S.
is an "honest broker" and that
the Americans are pushing hard for a real "peace"
is patently ridiculous.
The historical facts are so much otherwise that
the whole discussion about
these matters has become rhetorically surrealistic.
Bottom Line: Both the President and the
Secretary of State are in bed with
and yet politically afraid of the Israeli/Jewish
lobby at the same time; and
Al Gore is downright petrified. This is
the case even though Bill Clinton
has appointed more Israeli/Jewish lobby officials
to his Administration than
all other Presidents combined; despite the fact
that Madeleine Albright
appointed a leading official of the Israeli/Israeli
lobby to be the Assistant
Secretary of State for the Middle East; and despite
the fact that quite
literally all the major persons in Dennis Ross's
negotiating team are
religious Jews all with past close past ties
to this same lobby!
Bottom Line: The international version of the
Good Cop/Bad Cop game is
clearly at work here. The Americans now
pretend to be on the side of the
Palestinians, when in fact they are more than
ever on the side of the
Israelis who continue to receive billions of
dollars yearly, continue to
expand their settlements, continue to swallow
Jerusalem and surrounding
areas in gulps, continue to enhance their military
technological
advantages along with their weapons of mass destruction.
And all this
is done while the Americans keep everyone else
in check, veto U.N.
resolutions and involvement, pay Israel's bills,
and provide Israel ever
greater arms and "strategic alliance".
Some "even-handedness"!
True, the Americans make continual noises to deflect
serious scrutiny and
to allow for the pretense that things are other
than they are; but
Washington is more Kosher today than at any other
time in history, and
this whole "peace process" is very much a joint
American/Israeli concoction.
Bottom Line: No matter which of the now
discussed steps in the "peace
process" are taken, the Israelis are the big
winners, the Palestinians the
big loosers, the Arabs the big patsies.
As usual, the Americans will sooner
or later proclaim another "deal", and as always
it will be a deal that
tremendously benefits Israel no matter what is
actually said at the time,
no matter what kinds of colorful packaging it
is all presented in. After
all, if you intend to sell someone something
they don't want, and for a
very inflated price, you've got to to trick the
buyer into believing they
not only want it but are getting a good deal
when they buy it -- even if
they really are getting taken to the cleaners!
Bottom Line: The Israelis could switch public
gears and now agree to every
word the Americans are proposing and they would
be getting nearly all that
they have previously demanded. Despite
Olso they have given up little land;
and that which is now "autonomous" -- the Palestinian
population centers --
is completely surrounded by electrified fences
and Israeli army checkpoints.
For ordinary Palestinians things were better,
much better in fact, when
Israeli directly occupied them and before the
Intifada ever began!
Bottom Line: Today's "Peace Plan" is little
more than the "Allon Plan" of
the late 1960s, the Begin/Sharon "autonomy" plan
of the late 1970s, or the
Reagan plan of the 1980s. Actually, its
considerable worse because there
are far more settlers now, because Jewish Jerusalem
has been expanded far
more than was the case then, and because even
the notion of territorial
contiguity for the Palestinians has been signed
away by Arafat in order
to et the considerable guns and money he has
been provided to keep the
Palestinians "under control".
Bottom Line: Bibi, and Rabin/Peres before
him, has been getting most of
what he has demanded, regardless of how the diplomats
have been speaking
on TV. "Final Status Negotiations"
are to be pushed forward --
accelerated" says Madeleine -- just as Bibi has
insisted all along, but
with the Palestinians having nearly nothing when
they start. At best
about 10% of the occupied territories are actually
"autonomous" with
another 10% "dually administered". Furthermore,
while we're at it, let's
not loose sight of the fact that the "occupied
territories" themselves
are but 23% of 1948 Palestine, and that 1948
map was already less than
50% of previously Mandate Palestine).
Furthermore, Israeli settlement constructions
has not ended, it has
actually escalated! Not to mention the
greatly expanded Apartheid-Style
"by-pass roads" designed to totally dissect the
Palestinian areas from
each other while providing "safe-passage" routes
for Israeli settlers.
Not to mention the growing and smothering restrictions
Palestinians are
everywhere subjected to -- now by what has become
essentially a double-
occupation (with Israelis always in control of
course even if hidden
behind one-way mirrors). Not to mention
the severe forms of
intimidation and repression used by the "Palestinian
Authority" --
considerably worse than when the Israelis directly
administered the
occupation on their own.
Bottom Bottom Line: The occupation has been
colorfully and confusingly
repackaged, but inside the box things are actually
considerable worse than
they were before. What's been underway
for many years now is a kind of
international "sting" operation with the Arab
"client regimes", Arafat
now among them, being used, manipulated, and
taken for a ride time after
time. Actually its even worse as many of
these regimes -- especially the
Hashemite's in Jordan and the al-Sauds in Saudi
Arabia -- are actually
working ever more closely with the Americans,
and in many cases with the
Israelis, desperate to pull off this historic
charade.
True, it is a charade likely to have dire consequences
in the years ahead;
but the politicians of the day are not thinking
of history nor of justice,
they are only poking their fingers in the tremoring
dikes thinking of the
moment and thinking of themselves.
And if anyone doesn't understand all this imagery
and illusion -- just head
on over to BlockBusters (or the international
equivalent where ever you
might be) and rent Robert Redford's classic "The
Sting"!
________________________________________________________________
MID-EAST
REALITIES is published a number of times weekly and the MERTV Program shows
weekly on Cable TV. For past MER articles go to: http://WWW.MiddleEast.Org.
Email to INFOMER@MIDDLEEAST.ORG
to receive MER regularly.
Email to: INFOMERTV@MIDDLEEAST.ORG
for info about the weekly TV program.
M I D - E A S T
R E A L I T I E S - (c) Copyright 1998
MER may be freely distributed by email
and on the Internet so long as there is no editing of any kind.
For any print publication, permission
in writing is required.
MER - POBox 18367 - Washington, D.C. 20036
(202) 362-5266
(202) 362-6965 MER@MiddleEast.Org
|