Double Standards?
All Posts post a reply | post a new topic

AuthorTopic: Double Standards?
topic by
barb
4/10/2002 (13:24)
 reply top
Double Standard
Intellivu presents commentary by Linda Chavez

'This nation will do what it takes to defend that which it holds dear.' The words spoken Monday could have come from Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon. They didn't. They came from President Bush, speaking at a rally in Tennessee.

But the president's words make it all the more puzzling why he now insists that Israel cannot do the same to defend herself.

When it comes to attacks on the United States, President Bush reiterated his commitment to 'find the enemy wherever they may hide' and 'defend freedom, no matter what the costs.' Yet, he tells the Israelis that they cannot hunt down terrorists in the West Bank and that the cost of defending their freedom may well be U.S. support. It is a double standard unworthy of the president and inimical to the interests of the United States.

So far, the Israeli Defense Forces have captured tons of weapons in the West Bank, including 60 pounds of high explosives and some 50 rocket-propelled grenades, and they discovered nearly a dozen weapons and explosives labs -- some of which were seized within the compounds of the Palestinian Authority. The IDF have also intercepted five car bombs -- that is five more suicide missions that have been thwarted and dozens of lives saved. And the IDF have arrested some 500 Palestinians wanted for attacks on Israelis.

We should be applauding the Israelis, not demanding they retreat before they have accomplished their objectives.

The administration reportedly decided to pressure Israel when demonstrators in Egypt and elsewhere began anti-American protests. The administration's fear is that we will lose support in the Arab world for our war on terrorism.

But the 'Arab street' has never backed our fight -- indeed a few months ago tens of thousands of Muslims took to the streets in the Arab world and elsewhere to protest our military action against Afghanistan. And they were joined by thousands of others, including European and American 'peace activists' who protested when stray American bombs killed innocent Afghan civilians.

Yet we didn't buckle under the criticism. Instead, we chose to stay and fight. And when innocent Afghans died -- and dozens, if not hundreds did -- we, rightly, blamed the Taliban and al Qaeda for inflicting such misery on Afghanistan.

Innocent people are dying in the West Bank as well. But Yasser Arafat and the terrorists he harbors are the ones who are morally culpable for these deaths, just as the Taliban and al Qaeda were in Afghanistan. Arafat and the Palestinians could have peace -- and a state -- anytime they choose. But they would rather sacrifice their own young to blow up Israelis in the insane hope that they will one day eliminate the Jewish state.

The president and those in his administration seem to believe that Israel should negotiate its way to peace. But it is impossible to negotiate with those who have consistently violated every agreement they've ever signed -- as Yasser Arafat has. To insist that the Israelis withdraw their troops so that they can once again sit down with a man who has yet to live up to his previous commitments is an invitation to further violence against innocent civilians. Peace will only come when the terrorists are defeated.

If President Bush succeeds in getting the Israelis to pull out of the West Bank before they have completed their mission, it will embolden terrorists everywhere. And we may well pay the price in the United States, as well as Israel.

How can we hope to fight a global war on terrorism when we give a pass to Palestinian terrorists? In the 18 months since the Palestinians launched their latest bloody intifada against Israel, more than 400 Israelis have died. On a per capita basis, that is more than six times the equivalent loss of lives sustained in the World Trade Center attack. How many more must die before President Bush's words about doing 'whatever it takes to defend that which we hold dear,' 'to find the enemy wherever they may hide,' and 'to defend freedom, no matter what the costs' apply to Israel, as well as the United States?

© 2002 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.

reply by
nemesis
4/10/2002 (13:29)
 reply top
May I assume that by posting this article you are showing your agreement with it.

Or, are you just asserting your right to free speech?

C'mon, stop sitting on the fence!
reply by
barb
4/10/2002 (13:43)
 reply top
If you want the truth, I'm not sure anymore where to stand. At first I was with the Palestinians, now I wonder why I should support those that keep sending human bombs into civilian areas? If Israel withdraws, what guarantee is there this will stop? There isn't any.
reply by
Sharif Murphy
4/10/2002 (14:00)
 reply top
As a doctor, I dont look at treat the symptoms of a condition. I treat the possible causes of the symptoms.

The same should be done for the situation in Palestine.

Do you honestly think that the Palestinians would be giving up their lives if their lives werent made unlivable by the IDF?

'Its the occupation, stupid'

Not to call you stupid. But if there wasnt occupation to begin with, movements like Hamas and Aqsa Martyrs Brigade would have no clout.

Further humiliating destruction of Palestinian lives is a good way to secure a future where there will always be suicide bombers.

You really need to think about whats actually going on. Not only has the physical or collateral damage been extensive, there have been 2 generations of Palestinians that have grown up in refugee camps that have been constantly attacked by the IDF. Can you imagine the psychological ramifications? Its overwhelming.

The current Israeli government is doing a great job securing a future with conflict so deep that it may never be removed.
reply by
nemesis
4/10/2002 (14:20)
 reply top
'If Israel withdraws, what guarantee is there this will stop? There isn't any.' seems to be based on the assumption that Plaestinians are crazy!

If Palestinians are given what they want (and with which the whole world, except the U.S. and Israel, agrees), why would they still kill themselves?
reply by
JC
4/10/2002 (14:26)
 reply top
The concern amongst the Israelis is that what they want is not the West Bank and Gaza, but inside the Green line Israel.

Are they wrong?
reply by
truth
4/10/2002 (16:28)
 reply top
NO they is not .. not today..
but they were 14 days ago.
reply by
TheAZCowBoy
4/11/2002 (1:56)
 reply top
Linda Chavez?!

Hey, this right wing harlot posing as a Mexican, right winger and Mata Hari still has not found her place in the Anglo world. Like Joseph Farah, the Arab with the Jewish blood running through his veins, Linda doesn't know if she's an 'illegal', 'Patricia Nolan clone' or the 'Joan of Arc' of the Republican party!

Always picking on the illegal's and then she is found to have one on the payroll in her home working as a house keeper as she 'gracefully' bow's out as Bush's Sec. of Labor candidate!

I say she's a Republican tranvestite just out of the closet!

TAC,
reply by
__
4/11/2002 (8:51)
 reply top
chill phil
reply by
barb
4/11/2002 (24:25)
 reply top
AZ, why always attacking Republicans? It's the Democrats that have been fuc--- for a long time. These idiots have gotten us into the last major wars (before the Gulf War) and it was Republicans like Dick Nixon who got them out! We almost got our asses kicked by the Russians because of the dim-bulb JFK's stupidity in his dealing with Cuba.