topic by
barb
4/19/2002 (21:35) |
|
Good article although it doesn't directly relate to the Palestinian problem. It doesn't take a fortune to buy bombs to strap on your body. Still, interesting article.
SPEAKING OUT: Mideast oil sales funding terrorism
By DAVID E. BRUDERLY
The writer is president of Bruderly Engineering Associates, Inc. of Gainesville.
American, European, and Japanese purchases of Middle East petroleum is funding global terrorism.
Going back in my files, I rediscovered a book titled 'In the Path of God: Islam and Political Power, by Daniel Pipes, published in 1983. Pipes concluded that 'today's resurgence of fundamentalism is an historical aberration allowed largely by unprecedented amounts of disposable income generated by unearned oil revenues.' In other words the money that funds terrorism is derived directly from sale of Middle East, mostly Saudi, oil to the West and Japan.
Fast forward to 2001 -- commentators on ABC news confirmed that when the CIA moved to cut off Bin Laden's access to his own money, other wealthy Saudis moved to fund his terrorist organizations. This has been going on for more than 20 years.
Given this 'terrorist connection,' it seems that the major non-military focus of the war on terrorism should be to eliminate excess unearned oil revenues in the Middle East. The message that oil revenues cannot be used to support terrorism must be sent loud and clear. Floridians can send that message.
After the shock of the World Trade Center bombing, Americans must implement innovative strategies appropriate for this new war against terrorists; we must recognize that these terrorists are funded by unearned oil revenues.
The way to win the war against terrorism is to hit 'em where it hurts -- in the pocketbook. Follow the money, stop the cash flow -- stop buying Middle
East oil -- period.
Florida should lead the national fight to break this 'terrorist connection.'
Critics will say 'this is impossible; consumer protests will not have any impact; the cost will be too great, we have no other choice.' Perhaps. But this strategy will work. Why? Because over the long-term, we have no other choice.
More than 65% of all the proven and suspected worldwide reserves of oil are located in the Middle East. Does it really make sense to invest billions to allow Americans to continue buying Middle East oil when those revenues are used to finance our enemies? While some governments in the region try to be
American allies, they fund and harbor groups that have now killed more than 5,000 innocent people.
The only way to send a message to our enemies that we intend to win this war against terrorism is for the American people to vote with their purchasing power. Market pull is the popular buzz word; stop buying petroleum.
I propose that the people of Florida start a consumer revolution; an expedient first-step would be to ramp up the unpopular campaign to mandate fuel-efficient cars and trucks.
The long-term solution is to simply stop buying Middle East oil; this action is neither difficult nor expensive. In fact, conversion to non-petroleum fuels would be easy and painless for the consumer if the energy industry would simply make widespread investments in appropriate fuel infrastructure and vehicles; not in the Middle East, but in America, in Florida.
With proper corporate investment, conversion to non-petroleum fuels could be done at any level, from individual consumer to large fleets. In Florida, the state could easily implement an aggressive program to help individuals and fleets replace petroleum transportation fuels with non-petroleum fuels. Fuel stations -- large and small -- can be built quickly using existing natural gas pipeline infrastructure; modest investment in a few dozen strategically located stations would support immediate deployment of thousands of natural gas car, trucks, and buses.
Installation of natural gas vehicle infrastructure will also support deployment of super efficient, ultra-clean hydrogen fuel vehicles. Given market pull, large numbers of hydrogen vehicles could be available in three or four years.
Hydrogen can be efficiently refined from any primary source of energy; natural gas, coal, hydropower, wind, photovoltaics, biomass, nuclear, even petroleum. With hydrogen fuel infrastructure in place, never again will Americans be held hostage by the terrorist connection.
Combustion of fossil fuels is the major human source of greenhouse gas emissions, not to mention regional air and water pollution. Hydrogen derived from natural gas, biomass, and even coal can be a very clean fuel that creates a clear pathway to renewable hydrogen energy systems.
Hydrogen fuels are also safer than petroleum fuels. And when fully deployed the direct cost hydrogen fuels will be no more expensive than petroleum; with no hidden costs for military protection, environmental clean-ups, or security of supply.
Petroleum replacement should be the major non-military element in the war against terrorism because it creates a win-win-win-win situation for Americans.
It is appropriate for Florida to lead the movement to break the oil-terrorist connections. The benefits are many and obvious; with courage and conviction forged from a long-term vision and consistent leadership, there is little downside risk.
All we have to do is convince the federal government and the multi-national energy companies to start investing their money in projects that will upgrade
America energy systems. This is a simple decision when compared to the alternative -- continuing funding of terrorism through American investment in development of Middle East oil and gas reserves.
Three major college football games were postponed on the Saturday following the terrorist attack. When played on December 1, these events will be dedicated to the victims. I propose that the Gator, Seminole, and Hurricane football programs convert their vehicles to non-petroleum fuels and announce these actions at these games. What could be more appropriate than to honor the dead by introducing real solutions to the terrorist connection?
|
|