Netanyahu's Prophecy : Evil Encarnate.

Netanyahu's Prophecy : Evil Encarnate.

post a reply | post a new topic

Topic: Netanyahu's Prophecy : Evil Encarnate.

topic by
McNiels
5/23/2002 (2:00)

Netanyahu's Prophecy Confirmed by FBI Director Mueller

Last month former Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu made the
following prophecy:

'It is only a matter of time before suicide bombers will terrorize your
cities.' (Speech to the US Congress, April 10, 2002).

On Monday, FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III repeated the cue given by
Netanyahu, claiming that suicide bombers like those who have attacked
Israeli restaurants and buses will strike the United States: 'I think we
will see that in the future - I think it's
inevitable.' (Speech to the National Association of District Attorneys,
May 20).

The probability of such attacks is predicated on continued US support
for Israeli terrorism. What makes such attacks likely, though not
'inevitable,' is the enormous financial and media clout of the Zionist
power bloc in the U.S., which ensures continued support for Israeli
terror and occupation.

However, 'inevitable' is a word that can only be used authoritatively by
perpetrators and their co-conspirators. In other words, Netanyahu and
Mueller know for certain that there will be suicide bombings in the
United States because either they are the ones who will plan and
implement such bombings through Arab and Muslim patsies under their
surveillance and indirect control, or they are associates of those who
exercise such surveillance and control. This is the esoteric
significance of the FBI director's declaration.

reply by
Fighter
5/23/2002 (10:16)

Don't give in to Arab Mafia Blackmail.

If they threaten us -- Threaten to bomb the entire Arab world back in to the Stone Age.

Their choice.
Don't fuck with US!

reply by
TheAZCowBoy
5/23/2002 (10:37)

'Those that live by the sword--die by the sword.'

Let's face it 3,000,000 ( that's millions folks ) massacred civilians by the US in Vietnam and another 280,00+ in the 'illegal' bombing of the people of Laos and Cambodia 'isn't whistling Dixie.' ( I have skipped over the joint US/Israeli murder of over 150,000+ civilians in Honduras, Guatamala, El Salvador and Panama purposely ).

Then there's Israel's massacre of over 28,000 civlians in Lebanon, summer of 1982, Sabra, Shatilla, Qana and the latest attacks on the Palestinian's in Jenin, Ramallah, Rafuh as they have struggled to defend their land, water, lives and even their dignity from the IDF vandal's, killers, thugs and parasites.

The US/Israel may think 'God loves us best,' but in the end JUSTICE prevails ( see Vietnam, 1967 ) and GOOD overcomes EVIL.

I thought of these US 'crimes against humanity' as WTC came tumbling down.

Psalm 145:20

'Jehovah is guarding those that love him--but the evil ones he will annihilate!'

Re: Bibi Natanyahu is a low life LIKUDNIK who abrogated Oslo I & II, Madrid, Wye, and every agreement he signed with the Palestinian's as Israel's prime Minister--and there he is once again--wanting to follow another low life Jews--fat Kosher pig Ariel Sharon! Sharon & Natanyahu should go the way of assassinated Israeli Tourism Minister Rehavam Zeevi, the Rabbi Meir Kahane wannabe in the LIKUDNIK's cabinet...couldn't have happened to a nicer thug and parasite Jew!

'Squeeze the juice Arafat!

TheAZCowBoy,

reply by
Hilary
5/23/2002 (10:44)

And what have the Arabs done in the last 100 years to be considered morally superior to either the USA or Israel?

Answer: Killed millions of their own and spread terror throughout the world.

reply by
Peccavis
5/23/2002 (14:28)

McNiels,
Are these your own words? Or is this from another source? If from another source, could you please cite the source. If your own words, could you please explain how you came to this conclusion. Specifically, the ultimate purpose that would be served by such a conspiracy. Please email me if you do not wish to share on this board. Many Thanks.
Peccavis.

reply by
Beefy Bella
5/23/2002 (14:49)

Regardless of whose words they are, it is a very strong possibility that this kind of scenario is true.
I think everyone agrees that Kennedy was not shot by Oswald, so if the FBI and CIA can assasinate your own President, god knows what is in the pipeline.
I often find it hard to find differences between
the FBI and the Gestapo.
And after all, the where abouts of Gestapo Müeller Himmler's right hand man after the war is still not known, although many believe he slipped quietly away under the American wing
like so many others did.
When is America going to have a public enquiry into 9/11 and those Anthrax attacks? or has everyone conveniently forgotten about it all now?
Mind you do we need an enquiry? After all we have that amazing video and that is all the proof one needs.

reply by
To Peccavis
5/23/2002 (15:50)

http://www.hoffman-info.com/news.html

reply by
Peccavis
5/23/2002 (16:30)

reply by
yeah right
5/23/2002 (16:34)

That website is complete bullshit.

reply by
To 'yeah right'
5/23/2002 (16:55)

Why do you say: 'That website is complete bullshit. ' What information do you have to make you say so?

reply by
McNiels
5/23/2002 (17:07)

EVIL INCARNATE:
In the May 16 issue of the British newspaper 'The Guardian,' Jonathan
Steele writes that America is 'starting to feel like Brezhnev's Moscow.'
He reports that, 'Public debate in America has now become a question of
loyalty' and refers to a 'stifling conformity which muzzles public
discourse on US foreign policy, the war on terrorism and Israel....To
enforce this abandonment of reasoned argument in the name of a
witch-hunt against terrorists, a strange alliance of evangelical
Christians in Congress has come together with the leaders of American
Jewish organisations who normally support the Democratic party.'

Of course these supposed 'evangelical Christians in Congress' are
crypto-rabbis merely posing as followers of Christ. Steele further
states, '...On CNN's domestic news one morning their vacuous presenter
Paula Zahn urged viewers to stay with her until after the break. 'A new
book which criticizes American foreign policy and says the US has been
guilty of terrorism has sold 160,000 copies. We'll have more,' she
announced.'

Steele is here referring to Noam Chomsky's bestseller, '911.' He adds:
'The offending book was indeed by Chomsky but America's leading
dissident was not invited on to the show. Like Soviet television in the
1970s, which regularly put up regime hacks to pillory the two giants of
non-conformity, Andrei Sakharov and Alexander Solzhenitsyn, without
giving them a say, Ms. Zahn's guest was William Bennett, a Republican
former cabinet minister. He proceeded to 'explain' Chomsky's high sales
with a flippant 'kooks in our midst' argument. Many Americans were still
in deep confusion after the shock of September 11, and some people were
prepared to believe anything, he claimed.'

'Kooks in our midst' indeed, and some of them are in the White House.

The System itself pushes this 'kooks' line from one side of their
playhouse, but from the shadow side they themselves are leaking the
hair-raising truths about the 9/11 conspiracy. In the month of May alone
they have already leaked Bush's foreknowledge and the FBI's collusion
with one of the alleged 9/11 hijacking conspirators prior to September.

Soon they will make public the Bush business partnerships with bin Laden
enterprises (Arbusto Energy and Carlyle), and then quickly smother the
revelation with other fantastic and diverting 'noise.'

One wing of the Establishment will be assigned the function of deriding
the revelations as 'urban myth' and 'kooks in our midst.' The other wing
of the Establishment will undercut the denials with further substantive
revelations of the extent of the 9/11 treachery at the very highest
levels.

'Why?' you ask. By way of reply I refer to a column in the May 20
edition of the Wall Street Journal, where Enron mercenary Peggy Noonan
favorably compares Bush to FDR. Noonan says that Roosevelt was
investigated for knowing in advance about the attack on Pearl Harbor,
just as Bush is under suspicion vis a vis 9/11. But, said Noonan, none
of these questions about Bush matter, because 'we're at war' (as FDR's
Pearl Harbor treason allegedly did not matter during wartime).

There's your why and wherefore. The Revelation of the Method syndrome
inculcates apathy about matters of great import to our survival. When,
for whatever reason, the truth about treason does not matter to the
people who have been betrayed, we observe in our midst the workings of a
powerful form of psychological warfare.

The irony of this warfare is lost on most Americans. The spectre of
being labeled a 'kook' causes them to retreat from the conspiratorial
nature of the Establishment's mind control, even as a greater degree of
control is wielded. Hence, the bizarre reaction of Americans to
questions of the president's own role in fomenting the 9/11 terror,
applauding more presidential power and control. The Revelation of the
Method hypnosis has triggered the intended schizophrenic reaction of
worshipping our own executioners, even as we glimpse the terrible truth
about them out of the corner of our eye.

reply by
Cracker
5/23/2002 (17:07)

Yeah right,
Nothing can ever produce as much bullshit as America and the utter crap that Jew ridden hollywood spews forth.
He has the proverbial Zionist media induced mind, nothing is acceptable unless it comes from the recognised medium and is presented in the usual format. He then totters off unquestionably obedient and completely reasured in his new found security, run by the likes of the FBI and all those trustworthy types.
You are a fucking small minded moron boy, broaden your dismal mental horizon's, question things once in a while, read between the lines.
You seem like the type the media would love the whole world to be...A subsevant to their lethal and toxic whims.

Why has America not had a public enquiry into 9/11?

reply by
Turpitz
5/23/2002 (17:21)

I doubt David Irving will be thinking it bullshit. He will be living that scenario that the VINDICTIVE JEWS has orchestrated with the backing of Mossad, Spielberg and the media they control.
Trying to subdue him, he knows too-much and that is why he frightens them, everything is being manouvered into position to hush him.
And anyone else who dares question them.

reply by
Peccavis
5/23/2002 (17:39)

There are two ways to expose a conspiracy.

The first and most obvious way is to expose certain facts in an investigation that link the events to conspirators. This quite frequently fails, because those who wish to debunk the conspiracy theory will attack the theorist, attack the facts with competing facts, and to win over the public mind with disinformation and clever editing (evening news magazine shows are masters at this). It is an uphill battle to expose the conspiracy in this manner often only damaging yourself... like pissing into the wind.

The second way, albeit a bit more difficult, is to get inside the minds of the conspirator/s. Become the conspirator, hijack the plan before or during execution, and use the conspiracy to debunk itself. If the conspiracy is in fact true, then it is possible to predict the next move or series of moves to achieve the ultimate objective. If one can expose what will happen next with relative accuracy - in time, place, mode, and manner - then the conspriacy is exposed.

Of course, it must be communicated effectively if the purpose is to debunk the conspiracy and expose the conspirators. LaRouche and his EIR staff are the only ones whom I found to be effective at this method; but sadly the media has silenced him into relative nonexistence.

reply by
Turpitz
5/23/2002 (17:53)

There is also another.
If anyone mentions or questions the subject, they are silenced in the most vicious manner, or convenient laws are passed to bang'em up for a spell.
Or in Elie Hobeika's case just execute them.

Why won't the Jews let
Independent Specialist's do Ultra Sonic test's on the supposed mass graves at the Concentration Camps?

reply by
Peccavis
5/23/2002 (18:18)

No Turpitz! You're missing it. If you're in the KNOW, then do not expose yourself! Do not piss into the wind.

For example, if someone knew about 9/11, then that someone could 'become' an Israeli inside the WTC. Upon the emails and instant messages that say 'Don't Go!' then happily forward that message to EVERYONE including all news outlets (Jews don't own them ALL).

But here is what I've been doing lately. I've been telling a group of American Neo-Conservatives (after gaining credibility and trust) that IF Ariel Sharon is assassinated by Hamas in August, then that will be the beginning of the War of Civilizations! I am neither Jewish nor Arab, so if it comes true, then how in the world would I know unless I'm privy to a conspriacy? And if it does not occur, at least I got some of them to read about Huntington, Perle, Wolfowitz, and Brzezinski! To a non-believer, a conspiracy can be exposed slowly.

There are ways of exposing a conspiracy other than becoming an infamous victim of the media.

Heck, if I knew the next terror attack on America, then I would send an anonymous email to ALL news outlets saying that I got an FBI 'secret' alert to a terror attack just hours before the event. Hell, that would stir up a few questions, huh?

Trust me, I'm thinking VERY hard on what the next terror attack could be! I just hope I'm not 'knocked off' by the Mossad first! He he! ;-) Come and get me!

reply by
Turpitz
5/23/2002 (18:48)

I am not missing it, for a start i am talking past tense, where as you are not. I am not trying to predict the future as a phrophet does, i am talking what has passed.
Knowing the charming characters of the rabble that dictate everyones future and how 9/11 will be used as an excuse for every western statesman's contrived moves for the next thousand years, i cannot but think how terribly convenient 9/11 has been. And i find the issue of some tacky, hastily compiled video cassette, backed up by the hollow tomes of Bush and his sychophantic chum Blair as some sort of redeeming proof, a dire farce.

When is America going to have a public enquiry into the matter?

reply by
Peccavis
5/23/2002 (18:57)

When will America have a public inquary into the matter of 9/11?

Never. Sure, there will be an inquary, but it will be a secret panel of 'experts' or some Hollywoodied Congressional hearing.

But the truth of 9/11 will NEVER be known to the masses, unless there is a political motive involved.

Anyway, I do focus specifically on the future, because nobody can change the past. We can only change the future.

Yet I do not ignore the past. I use past events to try to extrapolate future events. Admittingly, this is very very difficult. But I do not brood over the past either. Nothing can change the past.

Given what I know, the future is very bleak and dark. That is why I attempt to change it for the better.

reply by
To Peccavis
5/23/2002 (19:06)

Did Muslim Fundamentalists fly planes into the World Trade Center on 9/11?

reply by
Wisso
5/23/2002 (20:11)

no they did not...!!!

reply by
Peccavis
5/23/2002 (20:11)

'Did Muslim Fundamentalists fly planes into the World Trade Center on 9/11?'

Honestly, as a fact, I don't know. After all, I wasn't there :-)

Do I THINK Al Qaeda operatives did the deed? Yes. Why not? After all, if I have this grand conspiracy to execute, why should I do all the dirty work myself? And I must need someone else, someone EVIL, to blame!

Let's ask different questions instead:

Did the FBI know of the plan? Yes, I believe so.

Did the CIA know of the plan? Yes, I believe so.

Did the Mossad know of the plan? Yes, I believe so.

Did the KGB know of the plan? Yes, I believe so.

But one must dissect and understand modern intelligence agencies to realize how they could know and be complicit in the deed, yet remain innocent of the crime.

Just like Al Qaeda, the FBI, CIA, et cetera are broken into departments (like cells), thereby nobody knows everything. After all, who trained Al Qaeda? Specifically, look at the now famous Phoenix Memo. Everyone did their job to perfection, yet it was simply 'buracracy' that broke down and failed to heed the warning. Yeah, right! As individuals, everyone is innocent; yet as a whole, they're all guilty. Blame it on the system; thereby the ones manipulating the system are never guilty.

Regarding the future, quoting Samuel Huntington:

'This centuries-old military interaction between the West and Islam is unlikely to decline. It could become more virulent.'

'The next world war, if there is one, will be a war between civilizations.'

If Huntington is the brainchild of future U.S. foreign policy, then why isn't the policy to PREVENT bloodshed between the West and Muslims? Why isn't the policy to PREVENT a War of Civilizations?

Hence, the true conspiracy. The cabal controlling the West welcomes bloodshed, welcomes terrorists, welcomes World War III. Why? Because the cabal knows the Judeo-Anglo-American Alliance can win such a war against the so-called 'Axis of Evil' and remain the only Super Power. Not only remain a Super Power, but ensure Global Power with the spoils of war! All of Palestine as Israel. More importantly, Middle East oil will become Kosher oil! Doesn't that make Arab blood boil? Of course it does! Yet the anger only feeds the manipulation.

Verisimilitude and serendipidy are enigmatic words commonly used in intelligence agencies for good reasons.

Thus the next actions will be that the FBI, CIA, etc. will allow future terror activities agains the U.S. blaming the broken system for such failures. Why? This will justify such a war against Islam.

Don't analyze the action; analyze the predictive REACTION.

Therefore, the trick is to know what, when, where, and how of the next terror actions! There ARE certain rules that even the West must abide by. To truly debunk this grand conspiracy is to use these rules against them! Beat them at their own game!

I will end here. Today is not a good day to blow up in a car bomb :-)

reply by
To peecavis
5/23/2002 (20:35)

Interesting musings.
You have a creative mind and you skeptical. Both I like. Sounds a little nutty though. You may be imposing order and structure on chaos and disorder to provide yourself with a sense that there is something to figure out.

Maybe, but probably not.

And what would you say to people like wisso who deny that it was Muslim Fundamentalists who did the deed?

reply by
Peccavis
5/23/2002 (21:04)

Thanks for the compliments :-)

Wisso and everyone else are free to believe what they want to believe. That's the ultimate freedom in a so-called free world. I would hope that nobody is denied the freedom of thought, imagination, education, and religion.

Anyway, Yes, I try to bring order to chaos. That's the scientist in me that comes out. Yet, if I am to be judged, then I only hope to be judged on the validity of my own theories and conclusions.

And if what I say has any truth to it, then I only hope that it will sway the future, if only for one person for one day, for the better.

Nevertheless, the foundation of all my geopolitical theories are based on oil facts: proven reserves, production rates, consumption rates, from whom, to whom, and most importantly whether or not oil is abiotic or purely fossil fuel. On this last note, I think the greatest secret is still kept a secret.

A thousand years from now, the Great War of Civilizations will only be known as a petty war for oil, summarized in a single chapter buried in the volumes of world history.

In a nutshell, that's my theory and that's my conclusion.

reply by
just facts
5/23/2002 (24:35)

Re Netanyahu: We have this perverse situation where a foreign ex prime minister has total, unfettered access to just about every branch of the American media _and_ government. The incessant Israeli - American linkage he so devoutly tries to establish has as its ultimate goal only one target: For America to fight Israel's wars. The 9/11 catastrophe provided the perfect framework. The fact that there was absolutely no Palestinian involvement in it does not seem to carry much weight with the people running our media and government.
Just as an aside - there is a stipulation that any individual or group lobbying for a foreign government has to be registered as a foreign agent. The only exception I'm aware of are the various organizations engaged in lobbying for Israel. Why?

reply by
McNiels
5/24/2002 (4:54)

I share Peccavis his theory. Thanx..You give us a greater depth and a wider vision of understanding. You impose respect for the reader's mind.---------------------------------- The first ' To Peccavis ' was me, in response to his question. This new ' To Peccavis 'is the same as 'yeah right','Fighter',and 'Hilary'; they insult, intimidate and terrorise. I am sorry to say they do not wish to convince others they just want to impose and dictate over others. That,
i call mental degradation and gulibility.-------------------------------------
Their excuses for the evil US or Israeli policy is worse than the deeds of US or Israel.

reply by
Paul (from germany)
5/24/2002 (6:03)

Let me ask you all one question.
Is your president aware of what he is talking?
In his famous speech about the fight against the terror, he declared war against 'evil'. Was this the meaning of theological 'evil' or can anyone describe it for me? Pakistan was 'evil' to the western world before 9/11. After this tragedy for the civilians and the crime on humanity Pakistan was an ally. How can your government changes its opinion so quick? Why did the several US-governments use the tactics that the enemy of my enemy is my friend? Are we common people really informed? Why was the target the WTC? In our news at the 9/11 they talked about the following targets: Airforce One and the White House. The WTC was probably not the primary target. Not even the secondary target. To assassinate a politic is a crime, but with a crime against so many civilians no one can expect that after such a thing a rational debate about peoples needs in other countries can start. Even the dumbest terrorist must recognize that they never can reach their aims in killing so many people and in such an undescribable way. Who was the winner? Who is the loser? Why do most people (and for my own shame I must be included) talk in common way about muslims, jews, arabs and mostly all talks are going in the direction to accusate in general. I don´t know much about US-conspiracies. But all I know is that the pictures that are drawn in the media is influenced by the hollywood created opinion about the always 'good ol´guys' USA and Israel and the always 'bad, ugly, dumb and coward' guys from arab, japanese, russian or german origin. Why always this black & white sceme in the US-policies towards the rest of the world? Is it possible that most of the threats in the US are home-made?
It would be nice to get a rational discussion.

reply by
Paul (from germany)
5/24/2002 (6:10)

Sorry, but I have forgotten to post an additional question.
Who can define 'evil'?
The 'evil' is always and everywhere and you can´t win this fight, because it is an endless one. Did your president declare the war against 'evil' as a permanent state of war? As the general mobilisation for the future? Without end? Who is 'evil' next? Europe? when the majority of europeans would not follow your president against the Iraq?
It is a really bad feeling inside many europeans when you logically follow the political developement in this conflict.
Thank you!

reply by
AMERICAN
5/24/2002 (10:20)

READ UP ON ADOLF HITLER MR. PAUL - HE IS A GOOD YARDSTICK FOR EVIL.

reply by
Paul (from germany)
5/24/2002 (11:26)

Sorry Mr.American,
but this is no answer on my questions.
Without doubt, Hitler and his ilk commited crimes and cruelties on humanity. They were evil, yes indeed. But that gives me no answer on the 'moral instance' of your government and the things that are a result of the actions by your country.
Or do you believe that being an us-american is a lifetime guarantee for never being or becoming 'evil'?
Is this a question of how megalomaniac one people can be?
I await some sane postings. Have a nice day.

reply by
TheAZCowBoy
5/24/2002 (11:51)

Re: Hillary's 'And what have the Arabs done in the last 100 years to be considered morally superior to either the USA or Israel?'

TAC: They 'oiled' the industrial revolution in America and bought us to the fore front as a nation--albiet--and a thug in the new millennium.

Answer: Killed millions of their own and spread terror throughout the world.

TAC: The US massacred 3,000,000 ( that's millions! ) civilians in Vietnam--over 250,000 in the 'illegal' bombings of Laos and Cambodia--while Israel massacred 28,000 civilian's in Lebanon, summer of 1982, then 'lent a hand' at Sabra & Shatila, then there was Qana--and now Jenin, Ramallah and Rufah--and the US/Israel 'axis of evil' jointly helped murder over 200,000 in Central America during Reagan's 'rein of terror' and you speak of Arab 'terror?' Will anyone break these joint US/Israel records anytime soon?

See Babe's you've opened up a can of worms with your insolence.

TheAZCowBoy,

reply by
TheAZCowBoy
5/24/2002 (12:06)

Re: READ UP ON ADOLF HITLER MR. PAUL - HE IS A GOOD YARDSTICK FOR EVIL.

With DIM BULB and that Kosher Zionist pig Ariel Sharon here and now, 'Tarzan' here has to 'swing back' 57 years in history to find examples of evil?!

TAC,

Psst, that 6M number is in error, otherwise we'd have a Gobi desert of ashes in Germany & Poland. But it makes for good press when the Jew goes holding his hand out for reparations and welfare payments. ( something the US black is having a hell of a time collecting in the US courts for 'real' crimes committed on US turf, at this time ).

For more about Jewish 'evil' goto: 'Khiam Detention center' on the web and discover the real evil and outright racism Zionism represents.

reply by
Xevious
5/24/2002 (12:54)

Hey there fighter : I hope America never gives in to Terrorist black mail.
But as far as bombing us back into the stone age, America already did that a long time ago.
It would make life a lot easier if you fucken Americans would stop funding the terrorists in the first place!
Youi reep only what you sow

reply by
Wisso
5/24/2002 (14:02)

Well i ll ask the same thing....

What has the jews done in the past 100 years xcept creat a RACIST ideology...Steal a country...masacre it s ppl...occupy neighboor country s land..fuck the world up...creat 2 World war...

reply by
Observer
5/24/2002 (24:20)

Wisso says 'Well i ll ask the same thing....

What has the jews done in the past 100 years xcept creat a RACIST ideology...Steal a country...masacre it s ppl...occupy neighboor country s land..fuck the world up...creat 2 World war...

Well Wisso, for starters:

[282] Richard Feynman -- 'The greatest scientific mind since World War II '
[272] Albert Einstein -- The most famous and influential scientist of all time
[73] Lev Landau -- Soviet physicist, Nobel Prize in Physics 1962
[35] Rita Levi-Montalcini -- winner of the Nobel Prize for her work on Nerve Growth factor (with Stanley Cohen)
[59] Aaron Klug -- Nobel prize winner in Chemistry, for work on X-ray analysis of biomolecules
[50] Elie Wiesel -- Jewish author: 'Night', winner of the Nobel Prize for Peace
[4] Georges Charpak -- won the Nobel Prize in Physics 1992 for his particle detector
[16] Shimon Peres -- Israel's Labor party leader
[31] Isaac Bashevis Singer -- Author, Nobel Prize-winner for Literature
[35] Martin Perl -- Nobel prize winner in Physics: discoverer of the Tau Lepton
[34] Niels Bohr -- Nobel prize-winning Physicist: atomic structure
[24] Yitzhak Rabin -- Prime Minister of Israel - Worker for Peace' Chief of Staff in Six Day War
[26] Arno Penzias -- Nobel prize winner in Physics, studied interstellar isotopes
[19] Milton Friedman -- Recipient of the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics
[23] Henri Bergson -- Author/Philosopher, Nobel prize for Literature
[8] Selman Waksman -- Microbiologist, 1952 Nobel Prize winner in physiology and medicine
[9] Joseph Brodsky -- Nobel Prize winner in literature, most famous modern poet
[11] Hans Bethe -- Nobel Prize in Physics in 1967
[13] Paul Ehrlich -- Nobel prize for descovering a treatment for syphilis.
[9] David Baltimore -- Nobel Prize in Physiology and Medicine
[5] George WALD -- Nobel Price in Medicine for work contributing to our understanding of vision.
[12] John Harsanyi -- Winner of the Nobel prize in Economics: studied utilitarian ethics
[7] Franco Modigliani -- Italian-born economist, 1985 Nobel Laureate in Economics: saving and financial markets
[1] Fritz Haber -- winner of the Nobel Prize of Chemistry in 1918, for the synthesis of ammonia from its elements
[1] Tadeus Reichstein -- Nobel Prize for Medicine 1950
[1] Paul Samuelson -- Nobel Prize in Economics (first ever)
[1] Albert Michelson -- Nobel Prize for Physics 1907
[10] Isaac Bashevis Singer -- 1978 Nobel Laureate in Literature: 'Enemies : A Love Story', 'The Golem', 'Meshugah'
[8] Shmuel Yosef Agnon -- Israeli writer, winner of the 1966 Nobel Prize: 'The Bridal Canopy'; `A Guest for the Night'
[8] Howard Temin -- 1975 Nobel Prize in Medicine
[9] Nadine Gordimer -- South African novelist, Nobel prize-winner in Literature
[9] Joshua Lederberg -- Nobel prize winner in Medicine, discovered viral transduction
[6] Saul Bellow -- Canadian born novelist and Nobel Prize winner for lietature
[8] Herbert Simon -- Nobel prize winner in Economics: for work on decision-making
[8] Baruch Blumberg -- Nobel prize winner in Medicine: field of epidemiology
[8] Daniel Nathans -- Nobel prize in Medicine: for restriction analysis of Simian Virus 40 DNA
[8] Elie Metchnikoff -- Nobel prize winner in Medicine, studied immunity in infectious diseases
[7] Claude Cohen-Tannoudji -- Nobel prize winner in Physics, developed laser-cooling technology
[7] Stanley Cohen -- Nobel prize winner in Medicine, for work in experimental embryology
[7] Paul Johann Ludwig Heyse -- Nobel prize winner in Literature, 1830-1914
[7] Herbert Brown -- Nobel prize winner in Chemistry: for his work in the borane-organoborane area
[7] Andrew Schally -- Nobel prize winner in Medicine: field of endocrinology
[5] Joseph Goldstein -- Nobel prize in Medicine
[6] Stanley Prusiner -- Nobel prize winner in Medicine: for the discovery of Prions, infectious proteins
[6] Hermann Muller -- Nobel prize winner in Medicine: for work on biological effects of radiation
[6] Reinhard Selten -- Nobel prize winner in Economics: for work on 'game equilibrium models'
[6] Nelly Sachs -- Poet, winner of the Nobel prize in Literature
[6] Roald Hoffmann -- Nobel prize winner in Chemistry: field of electronic structures
[6] Douglas Osheroff -- Nobel prize winner in Physics, for work in superfluidity
[6] Leon Lederman -- Nobel prize winner in Physics, 1988
[6] Jack Steinberger -- Nobel Prize winner in Physics, 1988
[5] Simon Kuznets -- Nobel prize winner in Economics
[5] Bernard Katz -- Nobel prize winner in Medicine, studied neuromuscular transmission
[5] Jack Steinberger -- Particle Physicist, winner of the Nobel Prize
[5] Harold Kroto -- Nobel prize-winner in Chemistry, discoverer of C60
[5] David Lee -- Nobel prize winner in Physics: for work on superfluidity
[5] Elias Canetti -- Bulgarian born essayist and novelist who was awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1981
[4] Isidor Rabi -- Nobel prize in physics in 1944
[4] Murray Gell-Mann -- Nobel prize in physics 1969. Introduced 'quarks'.
[4] Cesar Milstein -- Nobel prize winner in Medicine: field of immunology

reply by
wisso's brother
5/25/2002 (2:18)

Oh yeah? Well we perfected the art of suicide bombing. So there.

reply by
Salem
5/25/2002 (3:40)

To 'Observer' You are out of the point. Wisso is talking about Rightousness and Evil. He is telling the Jews to stand against the Criminal Campaign of Aggression ..to stand against Evil.
You turned the subject into the infontile comparison between two parties; like battles between football hooligons.

reply by
oi
5/25/2002 (9:06)

Nobel peace prize! what aload of shit. If that is what you judge a people on what a sad bastard. They dish those things out like Dolly mixtures for nothing more than political reasons 90 percent of the time.
Little arsehole American strange how Hitler is always quoted, old Joe Stalin killed far more than him, but the Jews were orchestrating that so that is quietly forgotten.

reply by
Peccavis
5/25/2002 (22:40)

Hey Observer,
You missed my most favorite modern Jew:

Norman Mailer -- two-time Pulitzer Prize winner (1969 & 1980).

But when he makes insightful remarks like....

'The right wing benefited so much from Sept. 11 that, if I were still a conspiratorialist, I would believe they'd done it.' -- Norman Mailer

...then I think the Nobel Jew Club permanently revoked any possibility of future membership.

Anyway, regarding 'Evil' - I'm sure if I could scientifically design the perfect weapon, one that could instantly vaporize millions of people I did not like with no living casualties and with no forensic evidence remaining, then I'd be the next candidate for the Nobel Prize winner in Physics, Chemistry, Economics, Medicine, and even Peace!

All these Nobel Prizes for most EVIL weapon ever created!

Of course, such a weapon does not yet exist (a nuclear bomb is close, but there are pesky survivors) but when one is finally developed, I would expect it to be the brainchild of a Jew.

reply by
40
5/26/2002 (1:02)

reply by
40
5/26/2002 (1:03)

reply by
40
5/26/2002 (1:05)

..of 40. It's just me Peccavis. I just wanted to see what color 40 would be. :-)

reply by
Peccavis
5/26/2002 (1:06)

Darn! No different from 30. Oh well, sorry for the unnecessary posts.

reply by
Turpitz
5/26/2002 (12:08)

No a vapourising machine has already been invented !
The Germans had one at Belsen according to Jewish eye-witnesses, they could vapourise five thousand at a time.
This was after they gave up on the 20,000 feet electric floors that opened up and all the jews fell through into baskets that took them to the Crematoria.
The Germans had some fantastic secret weapons.

reply by
Hess
5/26/2002 (14:56)

You are always after the Germans ?? Leave the Germans alone. Anti-Germans are those filthy Zionish-Talmudish-Jewish self-stylled-Israelites who REALLY are not Israelites nor Jews...Who are in the hibbit of accusining to intimidate ppl by Anti-semitism while they are the worst Anti-semites . Semites don't Kill Semites just because they are Semites. Mind you! the Arabs are THE SEMITES. The purest line of Semites.!!!

How about Anti-Germanism?? Mind you it is comeing. The Lion is sleepy do not wake him up..!!

reply by
...Resources..
5/26/2002 (20:28)

Go..To.. (1).. aztlan.net ..(2).. ukar.org ..(3).. kavkaz.org ..(4).. ccmep.org ...(5).. middleeastwire.com ...

reply by
...Look Here...
5/27/2002 (22:03)

Go..To.. worldmessenger.20m.com ...and.. reportersnotebook.com ...Message Board...