the middleeast.org/comments insanitarium
All Posts post a reply | post a new topic

AuthorTopic: the middleeast.org/comments insanitarium
topic by
John Calvin
6/27/2002 (20:10)
 reply top
'Conpiracy beliefs are a source of cold comfort. At the end of the century that gave us the Theory of Relativity, the Uncertainty Principle, and the Incompleteness Theorem, conspiracy theory returns us to a comforting clockwork universe, before the materialist bedrock of our worldview turned to quicksand. Conpiracy theory is a magic spell against the Information Age, an incantation that wards off information madness by organizing every scrap of the free-floating data assaulting us into an impossibly ordered scheme. Unified field theories for a hopelessly complex, chaotic world, conspiracy beliefs are curiously reassuring in their 'proof' that someone, somewhere is in charge.
Conpiracy theory is the theology of the paranoid, what Marx might have called the opiate of the fringes if he'd lived to read 'The New World Order' by Pat Robertson. It 'replaces religion as a means of mapping the world without disenchanting it, robbing it of its mystert', writes the literary critic John A McClure. It 'e4xplains the world, as religion does, without elucidating it, by positing the existence of hidden forces which permeate and transcend the reralm of ordinary life.

Like fundamentalist christianity, conspiuracy theory accepts on faith that social issues can be reduced to a Manichean struggle between good and evil. Like the New Age, it embraces a faith in the interconnectedness of all things, a cosmic holism not unrelated to the 'holographic universes', 'morphogenetic fields' and 'nonlocal connectedness' of quantum mysticism....conpiracy theory has become the horoscope of the late nineties, a kitschy charm against chaos, a novelty song to whistle in the gathering millenial gloom. It's a manifestation of the postmodern zeitgeist, whose knowing sensibility is neatly summed up in the computer hackers expression 'ha-ha-only-serious'

from 'The pyrotechnic insanitarium; american culture on the brink' by Mark Dery.
reply by
John Calvin
6/27/2002 (20:36)
 reply top
It might be interesting to note that a large number of the contributors on this site wouldn't last three minutes oo an MSNBC Bather-room on account of their insulting demeanors and bad language. In other words, they are total rejects even from the most superficial and pointless American internet communities.

Complete nut cases who simple post and repost the same nutty theories and comments. So far there are 3222 messages posted here but if you went back and consolodated the ones that are simply repeats of previous messages ( though each one is given out as a 'new' revelation' you'd end up with a couple of hundred at most. So people arn't even reading the postings that have come before. They just jump in, mostly for the purpose of seeing their own words in print and reveling in some sort of personal fantasy completely unconnected to the stated purpose of the site or anything that could be remotely called 'progress', 'development' or 'Change' therein. It's a new bedlam, or ship of fools.And perhaps most remarkably, most contributors are completely oblivious as to the real character of the monster they have created! One can't even detect an occasional note of irony! Posters take all this total nonsense seriously!Its the American insanitarium in microcosm, the new Coney Island!
reply by
Analyze
6/27/2002 (22:28)
 reply top
Wow Calvin,
What you posted is impressive. I actually read many of the posts, especially yours...although I don't always reply to most. You sure have a lot of time on your hands...

I think this site is a comfort zone for most of us to vent and unload the stresses of the issues.... but majority of us have a very full life to lead and actually laugh at ourselves and our own posts at bedtime. At least I do. I also try to make light of things, although I agree that not having a face to the messages, it all can be subjective or even obsessive. Also, one may post something that was meant to be funny & someone else is so serious may take offense to it...

So yes, this mind-boggling information at our disposal without true interaction can hook some down into conspiracy theories! or maybe MER-Forum addiction?

I think I'll check into MER-Addiction Annonymous when I find time.....but for now, I'm calling it a night!
:)
reply by
Lynette
6/28/2002 (8:11)
 reply top
John-I do realise that not all posters are up to your intellectually impossibly high standards, and I am probably one of those that don't make your select A list. However you neglect to consider that everbody has a right to their opinion, whether it be inane,clever,witty, satirical,boring,earthy,ect. Always remember that everybody votes and what they read on the net/forums and chat rooms shapes their opinions on world events. People talk amongst their family, friends and peers on issues that can have a direct or indirect impact on their lives. Intellectuals may think they own the 'patent' on discussing world wide issues and have 'exclusive rights' to solving them, but the little people (or the mindless masses as intellectuals like call them) are the ones who put politicans in office and probably pay your salary as well.

I for one am taking a LOT of notice in my country which politicans are Pro Israeli and which are Pro Palestinian, and so are a lot of other people in OZ ,John. Maybe this is why the Zionist toads have got themselves into a lather about their 'image' and hired an army of PR firms to push Israel's side of the arguement so agressively, even in the colonial backwater of 'Orstralia'......:-]