IS IRAN NEXT?
All Posts post a reply | post a new topic

AuthorTopic: IS IRAN NEXT?
topic by
ADAM
6/28/2002 (21:00)
 reply top
ON JUNE 7th 1981, 14 ISRAELI AIRCRAFT TOOK PART IN MASSIVE RAID ON IRAQ'S OSIRAQ ATOMIC REACTORS.
EIGHT F-16 FALCONS, EACH CARRYING TWO 1000 KIOGRAM BOMBS, & SIX F-15 EAGLES SERVING AS ESCORT PLANES COMPLETELY DESTROYED THE PLANT, WITHOUT CIVILIAN CAUSALTIES & BEFORE ANY RADIATION DANGER EXISTED.
ISRAEL DID NOT VIOLATE THE LAWS OF WAR OF INTERNATIONAL LAW AT OSIRAQ.
UNLIKE IRAQ'S THIRTY-NINE SCUD ATTACKS ON ISRAEL DURING THE GULF WAR, WHICH WERE EXPRESSLY DESIGNED TO HARM INNOCENT CIVILIANS, ISRAEL'S RAID ON OSIRAQ WAS CONCEIVED FOR ESSENTIAL PROTECTION OF CIVILIANS!
RUSSIA IS BUILDING TWO REACTORS IN SOUTHERN IRAN, W/ ONE NEAR COMPLETION. IT WILL BE RATHER INTERESTING TO SEE IF IAF WOULD BRING THE SAME TYPE OF DESTRUCTION UPON THOSE REACTORS!!
WHAT DO YOU THINK?
reply by
JoHn CaLViN
6/28/2002 (21:40)
 reply top
WRITING IN CAPS ONLY IS GIVES ME SUCH A WONDERFUL FEELING OF PERSONAL EMPOWERMENT I THINK I MIGHT START DOING IT ALL THE TIME MYSELF!!!!!
reply by
R Felt
6/28/2002 (21:51)
 reply top
Israel has no right to bomb power plants in a sovreign nation.

I'm sure the Russians would be thrilled about it too.

So Don't count on it.
reply by
truth
6/28/2002 (22:21)
 reply top
Actually adam is reading thomas freidman's mind.. but adam is ofcourse an idiot who does not know the talmudian way yet ..
www.nytimes.com under ope'd.
In true pure talmudian way , mr freidman is working the other end of adam's argument which is the mass deception suggestion of western aspirations .. so while Adam folks are asking us to bomb iran , freidman folk are asking us to get them to westernize .. hey .. it did work with saudi arabia ... but if history is any example .. after freidman gets iran to make peace plan offer with israel .. israel would then bomb syria ( as declared TODAY by israel minister to be a matter of time).
So just like saudi arabia in lebanon summit and then jenin .. we would an irani peace offer then hit syria .. I wonder how many times the old one two step would work.!!!
One thing is for sure .. The end of this scenario is not going to originate from the west or israel .. This will be settled by a lot of people who have been driven to super human abuse for a long time .. economic , social , even relegious conditions of the middle east is realling telling of a doom's day scenario and sooner than excpected..!!
reply by
John Calvin
6/28/2002 (23:07)
 reply top

Yea, 'Westernize' the middle east, getr rid of those backward, towel-headed fundamentalist islamist and bring on ENRON!





Exporting Enron
Public Funding For Global Plunder

Mark Engler, a writer based in Brooklyn, has previously worked with the Arias Foundation for Peace and Human Progress in San José, Costa Rica, as well as the Public Intellectuals Program at Florida Atlantic University.

Nadia Martinez is a Research Associate with the Sustainable Energy and Economy Network in Washington, D.C.

We know the damage Enron has done to the American economy. So why is it still eligible to receive U.S. taxpayer money? Instead of wallowing in bankruptcy, Enron continues to do business internationally. And believe it or not, the scandal-ridden and discredited corporation continues to pursue public funding for its global operations.

The ongoing reports about Enron's collapse have led many people to believe that the corporation is for all practical purposes defunct. Not so. Enron's decision to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection caused it to forfeit its energy-trading operations in America and forced the corporation to sell some of its assets. But a large number of its overseas ventures remain intact. Even as it faces shareholder lawsuits and Congressional inquiries in the United States, Enron plans to emerge from bankruptcy carrying forth its global energy services.

Enron, through numerous consortia and subsidiaries, continues to manipulate energy markets in countries throughout the world. Its present assets in Latin America alone include stakes in gas and electricity companies in Brazil and Venezuela, pipelines in Colombia and Bolivia, and power plants in Panama, Guatemala, and Puerto Rico. In many of these countries, officials have been assuring that the problems that the Enron Corporation has in the United States will not affect their local operations.

Generous American taxpayer money has helped build the corporation's global empire. A new report by the Institute for Policy Studies in Washington, D.C., shows that since 1992, Enron-related projects have received more than $4 billion in U.S. government financing. Other public sources -- like the World Bank and the European Investment Bank -- contributed an additional $3 billion.

By any standard, $7 billion is a lot of money. But now Enron wants more. The Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), an agency operating with government money, is considering a $125 million loan for a Bolivian gas pipeline expansion that Enron is pursing through a group called Transredes. Along with Shell Bolivia, the other key stakeholder in this consortium, Enron stands to profit in Bolivia by using public funds to further its objectionable practices.

Like at home, Enron abroad has a long history of pushing industry deregulation and avoiding oversight. The Bolivian government has recently begun investigating irregularities in the process by which Enron initially gained entry into the country's energy markets. Environmental and human rights organizations such as the Organization of Ethnic Communities of Santa Cruz, in Bolivia, decry the fact that the proposed enlargement of the Transredes pipeline would cut through ever larger sections of ecologically sensitive areas, as well as the protected lands of Bolivia's indigenous peoples. They point to a previous disaster in which the company's Sica Sica-Arica oil pipeline ruptured in January 2000, spewing thousands of barrels of refined crude into the Desaguadero River before officials got around to making repairs.

Why would the U.S. continue to help bankroll such sordid deals? In the name of 'free trade,' government-funded organizations like the IDB and the World Bank have spent over two decades promoting privatization of energy and power sectors. Since the Reagan Administration, they have forced countries that want development assistance to implement harsh 'structural adjustment' measures and deregulate industries. At the same time, multinational corporations play poor governments against one other for much-needed foreign investment.

As a result, public utilities have increasingly fallen into private hands and corporations like Enron conduct their business with little or no public accountability. Ordinary people suffer as companies limit supplies and raise prices, spreading misery among those who can't afford to pay more for once-public services like electricity, water, and health care. This also produces social unrest. Enron's imposition of price hikes has resulted in blackouts that eventually led to riots in Guatemala and the Dominican Republic, among other countries.

Members of Congress will have an opportunity to stop the flow of government funds to Enron, when the IDB and other public financiers come up for reauthorization. Before approving any more money for the banks, legislators can insist on prohibiting future loans for Enron-related projects. This would put a stop to destructive and irresponsible deals like the Bolivian pipeline expansion.

Such a ban against more taxpayer money for Enron's international exploits would serve as a good first step, but more is needed to stop similar abuses. The rules governing global trade and investment need to be altered to protect the public interest. We need to reject the drive by international financial institutions like the IDB and the World Bank to privatize utilities and to promote deregulation -- policies that invite Enron-style corruption and fuel injustice. And we need to express the same outrage at corporate misdeeds abroad that we show when the scandal hits home.

*********

tompaine.com
reply by
John Calvin
6/28/2002 (23:11)
 reply top
When the middleeast finally accepts the superiority of Western culture and Art the danger from terrorist fantaics will finally be over-
SUPREME COURT RULES EARNINGS
SHOULD BE PROTECTED AS 'ART'
Recognition of Pro-Formalist Movement Gets WorldCom, Andersen Off Hook

Washington, D.C. (SatireWire.com) — In a surprise decision that exonerates dozens of major companies, the U.S. Supreme Court today ruled that corporate earnings statements should be protected as works of art, as they 'create something from nothing.'




'One plus one is two. That is math. That is science. But as we have seen, earnings and revenues are abstract and original concepts, ideas not bound by physical constraints or coarse realities, and must therefore be considered art,' the Court wrote in its 7-2 decision.

The impact of the ruling was widespread. Investigations into hundreds of firms were cancelled, and collectors began snatching up original balance sheets, audits, and P&L statements from WorldCom, Enron, and Global Crossing. Meanwhile, auditing firms such as Arthur Andersen (now Art by Andersen) were reclassified as art critics, whose opinions are no longer liable.

'Before we had to go in and decide, 'Is it right, or is it wrong?'' said KPMG spokesman Dan Fischer. 'Now we must only decide, 'Is it art?''

In Congress, all further hearings into irregularities were abandoned in favor of an abstract accounting lecture given by Scott Sullivan, former Chief Financial Artist of WorldCom, which had been charged with fraud for improperly accounting for $3.85 billion.

'Art should reflect life, so what I was really trying to accomplish with this third quarter report was acknowledge that life is an illusion,' said Sullivan, explaining his acclaimed work, '10Q for the Period Ending 9/30/01.'

U.S. Rep. Billy Tauzin of Louisiana, however, was forced to apologize, admitting he could only see a lie.

'Yes, well, a man with a concretized view of the world may only be able to see numbers that 'Don't add up,'' said a haughty Sullivan. 'But someone whose perceptions are not always chained to reality — a stock analyst, say — may see numbers that, like the human spirit, aspire to be greater than they are.'

Several Sullivan pieces are now part of a new show at New York's Museum of Modern Art entitled, 'Shadows & Spreadsheets: The Origins of Pro-Formalism.'

Robert Weidlin, an SEC investigator and avid collector, was among the first to peruse the Enron exhibit, which takes up an entire wing of the museum 'You look at these works, and you say 'Is this a profit, or a loss? Is this firm a subsidiary, or a holding company?'' said Walden. 'I have stood in front of this one balance sheet for hours, and each moment I come away with something different.'

Like other patrons, Weidlin said he didn't know whether to be impressed or outraged, a reaction that pleased Andrew Fastow, the former Enron CFA who is a leading proponent of the Trompe L'Shareholder style.



'An artist should not be afraid to be shocking,' said Fastow. 'As did the Modernists, we should fearlessly depart from tradition and embrace the use of innovative forms of expression. Like, say, 'Special Purpose Entities' and 'Pooling of Interests.''

Sullivan, meanwhile, said he was influenced by the Flemish Masters, particularly Lernout & Hauspie, the Belgian speech recognition software company that collapsed last year after an audit discovered the firm had cooked its books in 1998, 1999, and 2000.

'Lernout & Hauspie simply invented sales figures, just willed them out of thin air and onto the paper,' he said. 'Me? I must live with a spreadsheet a long time before I begin to work it. You must be patient and wait until the numbers reveal themselves to you.'

And what about the reaction to his work? 'I realize people are angry, people are hurt. But I cannot concern myself with that,' he said. 'As with all true artists, I don't expect to be understood during my lifetime.'

(The MOMA exhibit runs through Sept. 3. Admission is $8, excluding a one-time write down of deferred stock compensation and other costs associated with the carrying value of inventory.)


RECOMMEND
THIS PAGE

Copyright © 2002, SatireWire.
reply by
Lynette
6/29/2002 (9:27)
 reply top
When the middleeast finally accepts the superiority of Western culture and Art the danger from terrorist fantaics will finally be over-


And yet the Middle East of 700 years ago was the hub of educated scientific men whilst 'superior Western culture' was lanquishing in the middle ages, racked with plaque, unholy inquisitions, and endless warfare. Go figure. If we keep believing in our own publicity we will end up being our own worst enemies. So called 'Western superiority' is in our own tiny minds. History is like the sands of the desert......forever shifting, and each civilisation that is on top of the heap, doesn't remain there forever. If people in this forum are worried about been destroyed by the fundlementalist Islamists......don't worry,be happy,coz the way we are heading in the West, we will probably end up destroying ourselves first....:-[