topic by
Dr. William Pierce
6/30/2002 (11:21) |
|
Mossad and the Jewish Problem
By Dr. William Pierce
Hello!
For several years I have been warning in these broadcasts about the
growing infiltration and subversion of American law-enforcement agencies
by Jewish pressure groups. This process, which has been going on at a
significant rate for more than two decades, accelerated during the
Clinton administration, especially after the Oklahoma City bombing in
1995, when Jewish groups put themselves forward as 'experts on
terrorism,' based on their experience in repressing Palestinians and on
their undercover snooping into dissident groups in the United States.
They offered training seminars to the FBI and other Federal police
agencies, to various military units, and to state and local police
agencies.
'We will show you how to recognize terrorists and potential terrorists
and how to deal with them. We will tell you about these dangerous
dissident organizations, these 'hate' groups, and we will help you to
prevent another terrorist bombing, such as the one carried out by
Timothy McVeigh in Oklahoma City,' the Jewish groups told the police and
military agencies. The most visible of these groups was the
Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith, but as we will see, there also
were other, less visible Jewish groups at work.
Never mind that Timothy McVeigh had not belonged to any dissident group
but had acted solely as an angry individual determined to send the
government a message that its behavior in massacring the members of the
Branch Davidian church in Waco, Texas, would not be tolerated. Never
mind that the Anti-Defamation League and other Jewish groups offering
their services really were pushing the military and law-enforcement
agencies to shift their emphasis toward the investigation and repression
of dissidents and the enforcement of a brand-new category of laws --
so-called 'hate crime' and 'speech crime' laws -- rather than toward the
prevention of terrorism.
Never mind those things; it was the Clinton era, and Bill Clinton had
brought more Jews into the government than any previous President. Jews
were riding high in the Clinton administration, from Monica Lewinsky to
Madaleine Albright. When the Jews wanted something, the Jews got it, and
smart bureaucrats, including those in the military and law-enforcement
agencies, knew better than to ask questions.
Bill Clinton's extraordinary partiality to Jews lasted right up to the
moment he left office, with a vastly disproportionate number of the
last-minute pardons and commutations of sentences he issued on January
20 last year going to Jewish criminals. The most notorious of these was
the international Jewish super-swindler Marc Rich, who was able to
persuade the head Jew in the Anti-Defamation League, Abe Foxman, to
intercede with Clinton on his behalf.
All of this partiality has served Mr. Clinton well. In his first year
after leaving office, he received $9.2 million in speaking fees, most of
it from Jewish organizations. He received $400,000 last year from one
Jewish organization alone, the Jewish National Fund, for three speeches.
More than nine million dollars for some 70 speeches during the course of
a year. Fascinating, isn't it? You can find more information on Mr.
Clinton's career as a speaker to Jewish groups for huge fees in the June
18 issue of the New York Times, if you look carefully enough.
Well, that was Bill Clinton, a Democrat and a flamboyantly crooked
lawyer from Arkansas who appealed to the lowest elements in the
electorate and had a love affair with the Jewish mass media. Most voters
hoped for more from George Bush and the Republicans. Unfortunately, what
we've gotten is more of the same. In fact, Jewish infiltration and
subversion of our military and law-enforcement agencies has proceeded
even faster since Mr. Bush took office. Bush certainly doesn't need the
money from speaking fees, but he nevertheless has given virtual run of
the government to Jews. Under Mr. Bush as under Mr. Clinton, what the
Jews want the Jews get, and no one in the government has the courage or
the integrity to challenge this situation.
We talked last week about the FBI turning loose 200 Israeli espionage
agents it arrested in the United States last year and about its refusal
to arrest the anthrax terrorist, who killed five people and terrorized
the whole country with his mailings of anthrax-infected letters. In the
anthrax case the FBI still is putting on a big show of trying to find
the perpetrator. FBI spokesmen claim that more personnel and resources
are allocated to catching the anthrax terrorist than to any other case
except the 9/11 attack itself. I claim that this is all a fraud: that
the FBI knows who the perpetrator is but has orders not to arrest him,
because he is a Jew who carried out the anthrax mailings in an attempt
to cast suspicion on Muslims and generate public hostility against
Israel's enemies. If this became public knowledge, there would be a
substantial drop in support among ordinary Americans for Israel and for
Mr. Bush's current war in the Middle East.
The big question is, why would the FBI go along with such a coverup?
Even with orders directly from Attorney General John Ashcroft or from
George Bush himself, any FBI official who went along with the coverup
would be taking a huge risk. Why do that for the sake of Israel? Who
would protect the FBI people involved if the coverup got blown? The
'partnership' between the Anti-Defamation League and the FBI that both
ADL National Director Abe Foxman and FBI Director Robert Mueller have
been bragging about doesn't seem enough to account for such a flagrant
dereliction of duty on the part of the FBI. Surely, someone in the FBI
would blow the whistle.
Actually, someone has blown the whistle, but you'd hardly know it from
reading the news. Of course, there's been much coverage of one recent
FBI whistle-blower, Coleen Rowley, a special agent in the FBI's
Minneapolis field office, in connection with FBI officials ignoring
reports she sent to Washington headquarters last August -- that was
before the September 11 attack -- about a suspected terrorist, Zacarias
Moussaoui, who was attempting to learn to fly 747 jets. But there's been
very little coverage of another FBI whistle-blower, Sibel Edmonds, and
the coverage of her far more alarming revelations has been quite
cryptic, to say the least.
There was a story in the Washington Post ten days ago, on June 19, about
several FBI whistle-blowers, one of whom was Sibel Edmonds, who worked
as a translator of wiretapped messages in the FBI's Washington, DC,
office. Despite her name, Edmonds is, in fact, a Jewess. But she is a
rare Jewess, without a very strong sense of loyalty to her tribe.
Indeed, an alarmingly high percentage of the FBI's wiretap translators
are Jews, and nearly all of them who translate Middle Eastern languages
are Jews. Most of these have a much stronger sense of their Jewishness
than does Edmonds, as Edmonds found out when they tried to recruit her
into the Mossad, Israel's super-secret agency for espionage, terror, and
assassination.
The Washington Post story relates her account of the recruitment
attempts in cryptic language that clearly is intended to avoid
mentioning the words 'Jew,' 'Israel,' or 'Mossad,' lest our gallant,
little democratic ally in the Middle East or its partisans in this
country be cast in a bad light. I'll now read to you the relevant
portions of that June 19 story in the Washington Post. I quote:
'That whistle-blower, Sibel Edmonds, 32, a former wiretap translator in
the Washington field office, raised suspicions about a co-worker's
connections to a group under surveillance. Under pressure, FBI officials
have investigated and verified the veracity of parts of Edmonds' story,
according to documents and people familiar with an FBI briefing of
congressional staff. . . . The FBI confirmed that Edmonds' co-worker had
been part of an organization that was a target of top-secret
surveillance and that the same co-worker had 'unreported contacts' with
a foreign government official subject to the surveillance . . . .
'The FBI said it was unable to corroborate an allegation by Edmonds that
she was approached to join the targeted group. Edmonds said she told
Dennis Saccher, a special agent in the Washington field office who was
conducting the surveillance, about the co-worker's actions and Saccher
replied, 'It looks like espionage to me.' Saccher declined to comment
when contacted by a reporter.
'Edmonds was fired in March after she reported her concerns. Government
officials said the FBI fired her because her 'disruptiveness' hurt her
on-the-job 'performance.' Edmonds says she believes she was fired in
retaliation for reporting on her co-worker.
'Edmonds began working at the FBI in late September [of last year]. In
an interview she said she became particularly alarmed when she
discovered that a recently hired FBI translator was saying that she
belonged to the Middle Eastern organization whose taped conversations
she had been translating for FBI counterintelligence agents. Officials
asked that the name of the target group not be revealed for national
security reasons. . . .
'Edmonds said that on several occasions the translator tried to recruit
her to join the targeted foreign group. 'This person told us she worked
for our target organization,' Edmonds said in an interview. 'These are
the people we are targeting, monitoring.'
'Edmonds would not identify the other translator, but the Post has
learned from other sources that she is a 33-year-old U.S. citizen whose
native country is home to the target group. Both Edmonds and the other
translator are U.S. citizens who trace their ethnicity to the same
Middle Eastern country. Reached by telephone last week, the woman, who
works under contract for the FBI's Washington field office, declined to
comment.
'In December, Edmonds said the woman and her husband, a U.S. military
officer, suggested during a hastily arranged visit to Edmonds' Northern
Virginia home on a Sunday morning that Edmonds join the group. 'He said,
'Are you a member of the particular organization?'' Edmonds recalled the
woman's husband saying. ''It's a very good place to be a member. There
are a lot of advantages of being with this organization and doing things
together' -- this is our targeted organization -- 'and one of the
greatest things about it is you can have an early, an unexpected, early
retirement. And you will be totally set if you go to that specific
country.''
'Edmonds also said the woman's husband told her she would be admitted to
the group, especially if she said she worked for the FBI. Later, Edmonds
said, the woman approached her with a list dividing up individuals whose
phone lines were being secretly tapped: Under the plan the woman would
translate conversations of her former co-workers in the target
organization, and Edmonds would handle other phone calls. Edmonds said
she refused and that the woman told her that her lack of cooperation
could put her family in danger.
'Edmonds said she also brought her concerns to her supervisor and other
FBI officials in the Washington field office. When no action was taken,
she said, she reported her concerns to the FBI's Office of Professional
Responsibility, then to Justice's inspector general.
''Investigations are being compromised,' Edmonds wrote to the inspector
general's office in March. 'Incorrect or misleading translations are
being sent to agents in the field. Translations are being blocked and
circumvented.'
'Government officials familiar with the matter who asked not to be
identified said that both Edmonds and the woman were given polygraph
examinations by the FBI and that both passed.' -- end of quote --
I'm sorry that the cryptic language made that report more difficult to
understand than it otherwise would have been: a certain unnamed 'Middle
Eastern country,' an unnamed co-worker of Sibel Edmonds who is a native
of that unnamed Middle Eastern country, an unnamed 'target organization'
in that unnamed Middle Eastern country, and so on. The Washington Post
tells us that the cryptic language is necessary 'for national security
reasons.' That's certainly a phony excuse. Do you really believe that
the folks in the Israeli Embassy reading this article can't figure out
who is being talked about? The real reason for not mentioning names is
not to keep the Mossad from finding out that they're being investigated;
it's to keep any Sally Soccermoms or Joe Sixpacks who might stumble
across the story on their way to the comic strips or the sports pages
from getting a clue as to who's really calling the shots at the FBI
these days.
Let me just run over the scenario again. After the Oklahoma City
bombing, during a time when the FBI was being criticized for letting the
bombing happen, Jewish groups promoted themselves as 'experts' on
terrorism and offered to train FBI agents and other law-enforcement and
military personnel. One of these Jewish groups was the Anti-Defamation
League of B'nai B'rith, a group heavily involved in illegal activity and
with longstanding ties to Jewish organized crime figures, such as
international super-swindler Marc Rich and Las Vegas gangster Moe
Dalitz. Another of these Jewish groups was Israel's espionage and terror
organization, Mossad, which specializes in the assassination of Israel's
enemies in other countries, using letter bombs, car bombs, exotic
poisons, and trained hit-men armed with silencer-equipped submachine
guns.
The impropriety of FBI involvement with either of these Jewish
organizations should have been obvious, but in the Clinton era no
bureaucrat in Washington dared say anything critical of Jews or Israel.
George Bush has a different style, but no more scruples than Bill
Clinton. By the time he became President the corruption had proceeded so
far that it was easy for him to decide to join it instead of trying to
lick it. And early in his administration another major terrorist event
-- that of September 11 -- gave Jewish groups another rationale for
strengthening their 'partnership' with U.S. law-enforcement agencies.
With Anti-Defamation League agents working on the outside and redefining
the types of criminal activity with which the FBI should concern itself,
and Mossad agents working inside and preempting for themselves all
investigations of interest to Israel, including all investigations of
Israeli espionage, it is no wonder that the FBI's efficiency, morale,
and prestige have plummeted, and things that would have been unthinkable
a decade ago -- such as refusing to prosecute the members of the largest
espionage ring ever broken up in the United States and engaging in an
internal coverup of the anthrax terrorism case -- could occur.
This is a depressing situation -- and as I have warned repeatedly, an
extremely dangerous situation. We are in grave danger of losing all of
our remaining liberty and soon thereafter becoming extinct as a people,
as a race. There certainly is no hope at all of rectifying this
situation from the top, through the elected politicians and the top
bureaucrats. Did you hear George Bush make his pronouncement on Monday
about the conflict between the Jews and the Palestinians? Yasser Arafat,
the elected leader of the Palestinians, must go because he has been
'tainted by terrorism.' Anyone who, like Arafat, has condoned terrorism
is unacceptable as a negotiating partner for the Israelis and must be
replaced by someone who has clean hands. Really! I can imagine all of
the Jewish leaders, including that 'man of peace,' as Bush calls him,
Ariel Sharon, rolling on the floor with laughter during Bush's
statement. I would not be surprised if it were Sharon himself, the
Butcher of Beirut, the mass murderer of Palestinian women and children,
the preeminent terrorist and war criminal in the Middle East, who wrote
that statement for Bush.
George Bush is a man utterly without honor, without principles, without
a shred of genuine patriotism or racial loyalty. As long as the Jewish
media continue to give him good press, he is perfectly content to be
Ariel Sharon's step'n'fetchit and to say and do whatever he is told to
say and do. Underneath Bush is Attorney General John Ashcroft, a nutcase
religious fanatic whose historical role model is Tomas de Torquemada and
who believes that the Jews can do no wrong because that's what it says
in the Bible. And then there is FBI Director Robert Mueller, a pitiful
specimen of an unprincipled career bureaucrat indeed, a man who is
completely unperturbed by the ongoing Jewish subversion and takeover of
the FBI.
Our one basis for hope is the fact that the takeover is not yet
complete. If it were complete, there would be no debate, no
investigation by some FBI agents of the Mossad, no newspaper articles
with cryptic language like the one I read to you from the Washington
Post. The fact is there are many FBI special agents who are not happy
about what is being done to the FBI. And there are hundreds of thousands
of perceptive and intelligent White Americans who also are not happy.
Unfortunately, very few of these people have the courage to do or even
say anything about what is happening.
And there is one other factor besides a lack of courage, although it is
a related factor, and that is the inability to address our problem in a
truly fundamental way, a truly radical way. There are many patriotic
Americans who would be alarmed to learn that a foreign espionage
organization, the Mossad, has infiltrated the FBI and is able to subvert
the FBI's operations, but there are fewer patriotic Americans willing
and able to draw the necessary conclusions about the overall role of
Jews in America. They see the problem as simply a problem with the
Mossad. They resist tying the Mossad problem to the Anti-Defamation
League problem and to the problem of Jewish influence in the government
generally. They resist seeing the connection between the problem of
Jewish influence in the government and Jewish influence in the mass
media of news and entertainment.
They resist seeing these things because to see them, to examine them, to
think about them and draw conclusions from them, is to become
anti-Jewish, anti-Semitic. And they have been so strongly conditioned
against that for so long that they simply can't deal with it. Many who
are brave enough and honest enough to speak out about a Mossad problem
cannot even think about the much larger Jewish problem of which the
Mossad problem is only a relatively small part. And as long as we refuse
to think about the problem, as long as we are afraid to think about it,
we cannot hope to solve it.
And really, we'd better begin thinking about this problem very soon.
Time is running out for America and for our people.
Thanks for being with me again today.
|
|