All Posts post a reply | post a new topic

AuthorTopic: US war nurturing fresh hatreds: writer
topic by
Someone
11/25/2001 (10:55)
 reply top
US war nurturing fresh hatreds: writer

By Stephanie Holmes


ROME: Outspoken US writer Gore Vidal has denounced Washington for waging what he called 'a perpetual war for perpetual peace' and said American aggression was only nurturing fresh hatreds.

In a scathing attack on US foreign policy, Vidal said that the United States would have been better served trying to buy peace with Osama bin Laden rather than send in the bombers to try and kill him.

Vidal, one of contemporary America's harshest critics, is publishing his latest collection of essays in his adoptive country, Italy. 'Anyone can describe what happened but you have to think to realize why Osama bin Laden did what he did. This is hard work and it will make you very unpopular,' he said. 'Osama bin Laden strikes at America at the moment we are entering a world depression. It is the most fragile moment in the ?West. For someone who does not wish us well that was brilliantly timed,' Vidal said.

In his latest work, Vidal criticised the government and media for not trying to explain the reasons behind the Sept 11 bloodshed. The front cover of his new book 'The End of Liberty - Towards a New Totalitarianism' shows a picture of the head of the Statue of Liberty with its mouth gagged by a US flag.

One of the essays details a series of US attacks on various countries since the end of World War Two. The piece was originally commissioned by an American magazine following the Sept 11 attacks but refused to publish it because of its uncompromising criticism.

'I've listed in this little book about four hundred strikes that the government has made on other countries. War, undeclared. Generally with the excuse that they were harbouring communists. You keep attacking people for such a long time, one of them is going to get you back,' Vidal said.

The US-led strikes on Afghanistan were not the right response, he added. 'What Osama did is not a war. It can't be a war because Osama is not a nation. He is a gang. It is like being hit by the mafia. You don't declare war on Sicily because the mafia happen to live in Sicily. You don't bomb Palermo. You get the international police and you track him down. And if you are a really great nation you buy him. That's the way every empire from Julius Caesar on has done it. ' He added that he believed US President George W. Bush, had ulterior motives for promising a long war.

'Bush is enjoying 90 per cent popularity, his 15 minutes of fame,' he said, condemning the president's reaction to the attacks on New York and Washington as 'suicidal'. 'It is not only wrong but it has repercussions that he hasn't thought about. He likes to stand tall. The taller you stand the more likely you are to get hit by a kamikaze pilot,' Vidal said.-Reuters
reply by
John Calvin
11/25/2001 (13:34)
 reply top
Excellent message! One can count on Vidal in these situations to come up with some really good stuff and to set the right tone (ridicule). I can only take so much of pointy-head pseudo-anarchists like Chomsky.

Where did you find this article?
reply by
Someone
11/25/2001 (15:52)
 reply top
Here is the link for a newspaper from Pakistan. I found the article on its International section:

http://www.dawn.com/2001/11/25/int17.htm
reply by
Mark Dirks
11/26/2001 (23:26)
 reply top
We don't need to worry about that. We have our own brand new hatred. You'll know it when it comes. The new reality is terrorism gets you war. If our enemies want to get all foaming at the mouth about it, well we'll just use them to grease the treads of our tanks.
reply by
Barb
11/27/2001 (23:46)
 reply top
You can't reason with everyone --