John Calvin, what is your purpose for flooding this Board?
All Posts post a reply | post a new topic

AuthorTopic: John Calvin, what is your purpose for flooding this Board?
topic by
R. Zuercher
7/16/2002 (15:04)
 reply top

John Calvin;

What is your purpose for flooding this message board, what is your agenda and who pays you?

R. Zuercher
reply by
John Calvin
7/16/2002 (15:14)
 reply top
I think the postings here are repetitive and assinine. I'm providing food for people who actually want to think about the problems of the Middle East. I am filibustering the usual line of crap from the idiots on this siter, at my own time and expense.
reply by
Dear God !
7/16/2002 (16:10)
 reply top
Basically John is 'God'.

And only his (copy + paste) opinions count.
reply by
pethetic
7/16/2002 (16:12)
 reply top
ever notice how ignorant people always manage to envie the others on their knowledge ????
If they are so ignorant .. how did they know that they do not know ???
reply by
Salem
7/16/2002 (17:01)
 reply top
Thank you Jo, It is very helpfull of you to refer to such effective discussions on very important subjects.
reply by
Bill
7/16/2002 (17:25)
 reply top
I agree with John.
John, I heard something last week from my brother that the majority of UN voted against US and Israel on our handling the situation with Palestine, can you give me any info on that, certainly haven't heard anything about that on US press??
reply by
Jewish American
7/16/2002 (17:38)
 reply top
I don't agree with all of John's positions (nor do I understand all of them), but I appreciate his desire to engage in a serious and civil discourse on the topics, unlike many who seem more interested in furthering certain dysfunctional ideologies.
reply by
John Calvin
7/16/2002 (19:38)
 reply top
I havn't heard about a recent UN resolution but I assume it was made by the General assembly rather than the Security Council. Generally speaking Israel is in violation of numerous UN resolutions pertaining to the conflict in Palestine but avoids sanctions thruogh U.S. veto power on the Security Council.

To me the works of William James- arguably the greatest philosopher in American history and recognized as such by the rest of the academic world- resonate quite well with the 'fundamental' views of the leading religious leaders in Iran- Khomeini, Mutahhari, Khantami and even Khameini. It is also the case that these leaders studied James and other western philosopers, historians, social scientists and novelists during their long years of schooling, especially when they studied abroad but also as part of the established curriculums of their native schools.

There is a very disturbing assymetry in this regard. It is certain that idiots like Captain Marvel, Adam and other 'internet ilks' have never really examined the works of Iranian intellectuals ( probably not any western intellectuals either), and to be expected, but very few real academics in America have bothered to investigate the situation in Iran and how democracy has developed their since the first Revolution in 1905. Rather, they have mostly followed the line of an ignorant and self-serving press. No significant challenge to the press interpretation of events in Iran has emerged, not even from the likes of Chomsky, as a consequence. Notice that the books by Khomeini available at Barnes and Noble have never even been reviewed, fascinating, intellectually and spiritually challenging as they are. One important aspect of these works is they weay they mediate between the ideological dogmatism of the old, discredited Marxist-Lenist camp and 'fortress' of unrestrained Capitalism. And the debate between Constitutional law ( wherein the ultimate power of the Islamic State is embodied in Parliament as proposed Khomeini and supported by Khatami, vs the authority of the religious jurists resonates quite strongly in America in its debates over the power of the Courts and the Executive vs that of Congress ( as embodied in the debate surrounding 'The war powers act' for example.)

I think this is one reason Americans find it so convenient to think of the Islamic Revolution as a kind of luddite, reactionary, regressive movement- it helps them to avoid facing their own issues about the future of the American Republic. In fact, closer scrutiny of what's happening in Iran would help Americans solve some of their own difficult and seemingly intractible dilemas. A greater understanding of and sympathy for the Revolution ( ala William James) would certainly help revive the American 'Left', which, in my view, has relegated itself to a position of almost complete irrelevancy and impotence in the American political scene.

Naturally, taking the time and expending the energy setting forth my views- based on more than twenty years of serious scholarship, is completely wasted on people like Adam, Marvel and so forth. Even on a guy like AZ who is so enamoured of empty polemical gestures.
reply by
TheAZCowBoy
7/17/2002 (3:38)
 reply top
Johnny Calvin :( going no where fast :) like 'old faithful' at yosemite national park 'spouts off' every 54 minutes and he doesn't care if anyone is watching or listening as long as he is having a good time and he 'feels' he is sounding intellectual. :)))

TheAZCowBoy,

PS: Watch out Johnny, there is just so much computer 'ink' in each keyboard, K?

So don't be a keyboard warrior!