Battle lines drawn up
All Posts post a reply | post a new topic

AuthorTopic: Battle lines drawn up
topic by
John Calvin
1/29/2002 (20:12)
 reply top
Hey folks, the 'punks' have got a plan too and are set to do some major ass-kicking of their own.
American Intifada-time!

Go on, punks, make our day... New York awaits anti-globalisers
By David Usborne in New York
30 January 2002
Internal links

Paul Vallely: The real opposition to globalisation will not be on Manhattan's streets

The message from New York to anyone who wants to disrupt the World Economic Forum that opens here tomorrow, perhaps by smashing a few windows at Starbucks in the name of social justice, is emphatic: just try it.

This is a city with a history of social and political tolerance. But it is also a city that wants a break from violence.

Just what will happen when about 2,000 delegates arrive in town – they include about 30 heads of government, business chieftains, and prominent cultural and religious figures – no one can quite say. That is because those who would spit on them, the anarchists and political agitators who make up what is loosely-termed the anti-globalisation movement, are in a fearful quandary: to raise Hell or not to raise Hell.

The hard core of violent protesters who so dramatically derailed the World Trade Organisation summit in Seattle in 1999, and provoked not dissimilar scenes of street disobedience at ministerial gatherings last year in Genoa, Italy, and Gothenberg, Sweden, desperately needs fresh adrenalin.

The events of 11 September drew world attention away from their agenda. And in the months after the attacks, its association with violence left a bad taste.

This week should provide it with the perfect opportunity. No target is more sweet for its many adherents than the WEF, which once boasted that its participants represented no less than three-quarters of the world's wealth. And this year it has chosen New York City as its venue and, more specifically, the swanky Waldorf-Astoria Hotel on Park Avenue. The world's broadcasters are here too. What better moment could there be for a street ruckus?

But it is much more complicated than that, of course. If trouble does erupt over the next few days in New York, any public sympathy for the movement might be lost. New York is a city still in mourning; let anyone dare trample on that. And it was one thing to battle the police in Seattle and in Genoa and portray them as the enemy of social justice. But since 11 September, every policeman and policewoman in this city is a hero.

But they cannot just hide. Brooke Lehman, a member of Another World Is Possible, the umbrella group for the numerous factions who are fighting against global integration, said: 'If we back down now, we'll send the message that the globalisation movement has been scared quiet. I think it's more important to come together and put our message out, knowing full well the media may spin it in such a way that's unfavourable, but that's a chance I think we have to take.'

The WEF has been running its annual gatherings – essentially as giant cocktail parties for the powerful to hob-nob – since 1971. Until now, it has always taken place under the snowy slopes of Davos in Switzerland. The organisers decided to abandon the ski resort out of solidarity with New York after the attacks of September. The theme this year will in part be resolving conflict and searching for better understanding of religious differences worldwide.

They also skipped Davos in part because of the ever worsening nightmare of providing security. The Swiss authorities were tiring of the responsibility and of the cost. Ironically, it was far easier to stop anarchists reaching Davos up the single rail line that links it to the outside world than it will be to keep troublemakers away from Park Avenue in New York City.

Just in case blood does run hot, the New York Police has served notice that it will practice zero tolerance of civic disobedience. Four thousand officers, in uniforms and plain clothes, will surround the hotel. Post boxes have been removed and manholes welded shut. And in case mass arrests are necessary, a warehouse in the Brooklyn Navy Yards has been prepared to hold up to a thousand protesters.

That is not to say that demonstrations will not take place. Four permits for marches have been issued by the city so far. Moreover, special pens on pavements close to the hotel have been erected for protesters to gather. If they shout loud enough, delegates at the Waldorf's main entrance might just be able to hear them. But the police will not sit back if more radical tactics are adopted, such as sit-downs to block the streets and violence.

To signal how serious they are, the police have warned they will enforce an 1845 law that forbids people to wear masks in the street. 'That is a law that is on the books,' said Joseph Esposito of the NYPD. 'If three or more people are marching with masks on, they are violating the law and that will not be tolerated.'

'If people want to come to New York to protest in a peaceful manner, we welcome and respect their right to do so,' said Michael O'Looney, the department's spokesman. 'But keep in mind that the citizens of this city have been through a lot in the last five months. We will not tolerate anyone breaking the law.'

Some people among the anti-globalisation ranks predict the attitude of the NYPD guarantees there will be mass arrests. Others think that most in the movement will opt for non-violent forms of protest. Street theatre is likely to feature large, with many protesters taking to the streets with giant puppets mocking the WEF and its guests.

'It's a brilliant PR move, to essentially dare the anti-globalisation movement to do anything in confrontation with the NYPD,' says Mike Dolan, the deputy director of Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch.

'The minute a provocateur puts a brick through a window in Manhattan, the media will grab onto it and that'll be the story. In the post-September 11 climate, this is a trap.'

If it is a trap, some may feel inclined to fall into it anyway. David Graeber of the Anti-Capitalist Convergence, a coalition of anarchist groups, said: 'We feel like we're under some obligation to do something, and to show that if you can do it now, in New York, you can do it anywhere. It's scary, they're going to kick our asses, but we've got to do it anyway.'

reply by
liz beech
1/30/2002 (11:32)
 reply top
For me non-violent direct action is the only possible way forward. I am well versed in all the debates about 'property' and have myself been jailed for 'criminal damage' - cutting the perimeter fence at Greenham Common. The reason why nvda at Greenham 'worked', I think, was because there was a community living round the base at Greenham, and that all of us had devised strategies to ensure that our understanding of non-violence was maintained - the bottom line was that no harm whatsoever should occur to any living thing - that includes plants, trees, animals as well as, of course, people. To assist this many actions were made in silence, or singing. In this way we avoided verbal exchanges with the military, the police etc. We evolved groups in which some people did not take part in the actions but 'monitored' them, both to ensure that people who were taking part were OK and also to document what was going on.

Did it ever go wrong? - yes, of course, sometimes people didn't hold it together and retaliated, sometimes such new and surprising tactics were used by the police and the military that things became shambolic, but, for the most part and for at least three years, that commitment to non-violence was the strongest card we had.

I haven't been on a demonstration since that time in the 80's because that commitment has not been there and most of the big demonstrations have become running battles between the 'protesters' and 'the state'.

At this time I would probably argue against damaging 'property' too. I wouldn't give 'the state' any opportunity to claim they were 'protecting' someone or something. Are there enough people to adopt this courageous method of expressing their desire not to 'raise Hell' but to 'raise Heaven?'
reply by
John Calvin
1/30/2002 (14:35)
 reply top
This 'Black Bloc' action coming up in NYC is an American Intifada- as in D.C. and Quebec City.

In order to carry on with their 'globalization' and 'war on terrorism' ( including the continued injustices perpetrated against all the people of Palestine} the 'ruling elite', the people who hold the reigns of power and policy in their hands and those who support them ( whether directly or through silent acquiescence, or simply by being so out of it as to not recognize a moment of danger) must be made to pay a price. There are many, many young people in this country-abandoned by their elders- who feel the injustice of the policies, have absolutely nothing to gain in the future by the continued maintainance of the status quo, are willing to take the risk and make the sacrifice. Indeed, they could not live with themselves any longer in the absence of direct action. The degree of violence in the protest will be in direct proportion to the unwillingness of those who hold the reigns of power- or report on them-to engage in a meaningful and productive dialogue on the real issues;In direct proportion to their refusal to engage in a dialogue of civilizations.In short, there will be no established boundry to the violence that might manifest itself in this demonstration, as things stand now.

Furthermore, there is no question that the destruction of property, and injuries that occur in these demonstrations have had and will continue to have a profound impact on the thinking of the parties to which they are directed, as a direct result of the upheaval they create. A positive impact towards a change for the better.

If non-violence were the only option, we'd still be a colony of Great Britain,all the Jews would have been exterminated and Hitler would have ruled the world. The issues at stake today in America are not something less than that. We stand at a crossroads. The kingdom of evil is everywhere triumphant in America. Something must be done, sacrifices have to be made. There is no other choice.. .but we also praise the peaceful non-violent demonstrators for helping to set the stage and draw up the lines of battle.

I have asked my daughter not to do this,I am terrified that something will happen to her, but,the decision being made and out of my hands I support her one hundred percent and will defend her honor, her life and her actions without regret til my dying day, whatever happens.
reply by
Ron
1/30/2002 (14:47)
 reply top
I know I'm preaching to the choir here, but the real punks of the world are the punks who think that because they have money, they have a right to dictate to those who have not sqaundered their existance exalting money above everything else.

Such punks were the ones who pushed too far in early America, and watched as a far more powerful nation was born as a direct result of the actions of the rich punks running Brittan.

These same punks treated my Hindu and Muslim brothers in India like sub-humans, playing games with their national wealth and sovereignty, beating them for not doing what they were told. The depraved bastards they are, they even turned them against each other, playing off of their fears of one another. Is that not exactly how a punk acts? Yes, it is.

Please, everyone who goes to those dmonstrations must remember that if we comit wrongs, then we are no better than them, and deserve to have them as our masters. But, if we are peaceful, refusing to do wrong, then they will be forced to make manifest their depravit, and spin spin spin things, as they did in Washington.

Everyone who watched the Washington 'riots' on the independent video feeds on the net, know what I'm talking about. You people who watch CNN(censored news network) and think you know what's going on are in a dream land, seeing things as they want you to see them.
reply by
John Calvin
1/30/2002 (18:50)
 reply top
Yea, but how wrong is it to shut down traffic, overturn a bunch of dumpsters,smash some windows, throw tear gas back at the cops and make them do a little work for their pay, sticking 'world leaders' with the bill.
How wrong is it to earn the respect of those same cops by doing something instead of standing around waving some flowers, chanting some 'peace slogans' and having a 'love-in' of 'alternative culture'.

Screw watching demonstrations on TV, so called 'Indy Media'- their reports were as bogus, and one sided as CNN- preaching to the choir as you said, the choir that goes on rehearsing a performance they never give, or ever really intend to. The 'loyal opposition',self-justifying excuse for doing absolutely nothing and persuading nobody.

You want to change people's minds? First show them you mean business.



reply by
liz beech
1/31/2002 (11:47)
 reply top

'mean business' John?
What about living life 24/7 in a non-violent objection to the 'status quo? You think it doesn't make a difference? How many people 'gave up' their dreams of a more humane society after they - got a job, got a house, got into debt ? How many people in the 'developed' world have reached middle age and beyond holding fast to the ideals they held when they were young - not as a piece of nostalgia, but as a reality - day in day out.

Of course young people take to the streets to express disgust at the world they find themselves in - and hurl things around, and get hurt, and in some cases die. I'm not going to admire them for behaving violently, but I understand their frustration. Most of the parents caved in, gave up, 'joined'. Not because non-violence didn't work but because they fell for the blandishments of the status quo.

reply by
John Calvin
2/2/2002 (7:43)
 reply top
The first sign that today's demonstrations will represent a serious inconvenience to the participants who mouth empty formulas about poverty being the root cause of terrorism, and think only of enriching themselves at the expense of international law and humanitarian justice. Of course they are already paying for the 3 or 4 thousand cops required to protect them from the people whose interests they pretend to serve, none of whom would be necessary if the rubric of 'non-violent protest' entirely prevailed.


World Forum Web Site Crashes

By Jim Krane
AP Technology Writer
Friday, February 1, 2002; 5:49 PM

NEW YORK –– The Web site of the World Economic Forum crashed Friday, and cyber-activists claimed they took it down in a 'virtual sit-in.'

Forum officials said they were trying to determine what brought the site down. They originally attributed the failure to 'overuse,' but messages posted on a Web site called Indymedia.org. took credit for the crash.

Anti-globalization groups urging Internet users to join the cyberattacks identified themselves as Electronic Disturbance Theater, Electronic Civil Disobedience and the Federation of Random Action.

'We regard it as a nuisance. We hope the site goes back up soon,' said Charles McLean, the forum's communications director.

McLean said technicians were struggling Friday to restore the site, which carries the forum's press releases and other information at www.weforum.org.

Coordinating a cyberattack requires minimal sophistication and the tools are readily available on the Internet.

Last year, computer hackers stole credit card details and other personal information for hundreds of World Economic Forum participants off the Internet, including former President Clinton, South African President Thabo Mbeki, Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat and others.

McLean said security experts had patched security holes in the organization's servers after last year's breaches.

For a conference that prides itself on deft use of cutting-edge technology, the World Economic Forum has been plagued by a surprising slew of technical glitches.

On Thursday, guests lined up for an hour or longer to receive free Compaq iPAQ handheld computers, equipped with short-range wireless modems that allow participants to receive e-mail and register for panel discussions.

But for many, the wait wasn't worth it.

'The wireless connection was somewhat capricious – very slow,' said Dani Rodrik, a Harvard University economist who spoke at the conference.

Outside the Waldorf-Astoria hotel conference site, the connection didn't work at all, guests said.

One gadget that did win guests' praise was the hologram-equipped identity badge system. All 3,000 guests and reporters at the conference must wear the badges to enter the forum's two hotel sites and the badges can be used to log on to a network of computer kiosks.

The kiosks allow guests to register in advance for panel discussions, and send e-mail to all conference participants – from Jordan's King Abdullah to Microsoft Corp. Chairman Bill Gates.

The five-day forum provides meeting time for the world's movers-and-shakers to swap ideas about the global economy.


© 2002 The Associated Press
reply by
John Calvin
2/2/2002 (10:10)
 reply top
Are there not also in our own age monsters of men, dripping with inner vices, yet putting forth the outward appearance and mask of uprightness? Yet they shall melt like wax when truth, the daughter of time, shall reveal herself.
Let them sell as they will sad-faced shows of piety to the public, the time will come that he who has sold smoke will perish by smoke.