For Whom The Bell Tolls
By Israel Shamir
"Do not ask for whom the bell tolls, it tolls for thee," said the
English poet, John Donne. A shameful Austrian verdict bodes ill not
only for the English historian David Irving (sentenced to three years
of gaol) but for our freedom as well. Never has our feeling of justice
been insulted like this! When an occasional dissident was jailed in
Brezhnev's Russia or Ne Win's Burma, there was always an uproar of
protest. Now the only response to the Irving verdict is stunned
silence. When they sent innocent Muslims to the living hell of
Guantanamo, we could think: they are people of the Third World --
different rules apply. A Batista policeman in Graham Greene's Our Man
in Havana had said: some people can be tortured, and some can not.
When Ernst Zundel was kidnapped in the US and brought to trial in
Germany, we could think: it is a German internal affair. Now an
eminent man of letters, an author of widely read and acclaimed books,
a recognized European figure was snatched from a civilised country and
jailed for irreverence to the jews.
Technically, David Irving was sentenced for so-called "holocaust
denial". But the concept of the jew "holocaust" being the only
enforced dogma of supposedly secular Europe has little to do with the
Second World War and its atrocities. It has everything to do with the
Jewish claim of superiority and exclusivity.
There is a jew prayer saying: "Bless you, Lord, that you created me a
Jew, that you separated between jews and the earth folks, like you
separated between the Holy and Profane, that our fate is not like
The Holocaust concept is just another form of this prayer. They say
that even their death is not like the death of anybody else. We must
deny the concept of holocaust without doubt and hesitation, even if
every story of holocaust down to the most fantastic invention of
Wiesel were absolutely true. Therefore the technical discussions of
jew mortality are perfectly legitimate but superfluous, like the
argument whether a whale could swallow Jonah is superfluous for an
The legal enforcers of the holocaust want us to bow down to the idol
of jew superiority, or else! They won't jail Deborah Lipstadt for
denial of the Holocaust of Dresden, or Guenter Lewy who penned a
lengthy piece entitled Were American Indians the Victims of Genocide?
denying the genocide of native Americans.
The jews produced and published these denials for the same reason they
published the Satanic Pictures - in order to emphasise the difference
between a goy and a jew. They want you to remember: you may profane
Islam and Christianity, but not judaism. You may discount the
suffering of anybody but the jews.
Thus we should say: David Irving was sentenced for denial of jew
superiority. His doom seals the reign of (albeit limited) freedom that
began with the fall of Bastille. European history went full circle:
from rejecting the rule of Church and embracing free thought, to the
new jew mind-control on a world scale. Not only is Western Christian
civilisation dead, but even its successor, secular European
civilisation, has met its demise only a few days after its proud and
last celebration by the Danish scribes. It was short-lived: about two
hundred years from beginning to the end, the Europeans may once have
had the illusion that they can live without an ideological supremacy.
Now this illusion is over; and the jews came in the stead of the old
and tired See of St Peter to rule over the minds and souls of
In 1962, Look magazine invited founder of the jew state David
Ben-Gurion to picture the world 25 years into the future. He predicted
that World Government would already be in place by 1987, with the
Supreme Court for Mankind (the higher ecclesiastic body) would be
established in Jerusalem, along with a shrine there commemorating the
jew role in the bringing-together of mankind. He was mistaken by only
a few years. The world is not fully subdued yet, but it already knows
its new master.
In the 19th century, Europeans could not fully colonise China. But
there was an obvious mark of their supremacy: the Settlement System.
It divided the residents of China into two categories: the supreme
human beings (the Europeans) and the lowly natives. A native who
raised his hand against a superior European was tried by European
colonial law, a European whose misdeed caused harm to a native was out
of bounds of native justice. This system of "settlements" was
dismantled by Chairman Mao after the Communist victory of 1949.
Similar systems of colonial justice went down with the colonial
empires that employed them, and for a short while afterwards, every
country was sovereign over its land.
Some time ago, the Knesset of the jew State revived the Settlement
System for the non-yet-fully-colonised world: an offender against the
jews, wherever he lives, wherever he commits his offence, can be
brought to the jew court. The offended jew may have no connection
whatsoever to the Jewish State, the offence may be not considered an
offence by the local native law, but he still can be brought to
Jewish justice in Jerusalem. This law claimed supreme sovereignty of
the Jews over the rest of mankind. This law denied the sovereignty of
all nations save one. Such a claim had to be treated as any hostile
attempt of the nation's sovereignty: as an act of war. But it passed
in silence due to a marvellous jew invention: gradualness.
This method was explained by Amira Hass, the Haaretz correspondent in
colonised Palestine. She wrote: "If you throw a frog into boiling
water, it will jump out and save its life. But a frog swimming in room
temperature water that is gradually heated will grow used to the heat;
by the time the water boils, it's too late and the frog dies. In the
development of the Israeli system of control over the Palestinian
people and their land, the Israeli occupation has raised to the level
of genius the use of gradualness as a means of making people grow used
to something." This gradualness was used by the Jews – not only in
regard to the Palestinians.
The Settlement System started small: the Long Arm of the jews
snatched Adolf Eichmann in Argentina and brought him to jew justice
in Jerusalem. Adolf Eichmann was a bad guy who did a lot of harm to
jews in a big way, so many countries chose to disregard this grievous
infringement of Argentine sovereignty. And it was just the beginning:
A few years later, the Polish court demanded the extradition of a jew
mass murderer, Solomon Morel. This Morel tortured and killed with his
own hands hundreds of ethnic Germans in a concentration camp in
postwar Poland. His crimes were exposed by the late American
journalist John Sack. Morel escaped to Tel Aviv, and the Jewish state
replied to the Polish demand with imperial haughtiness: "What
Chutzpah! These natives do not know their place!" Probably, Queen
Victoria would reply like that if a native African chief were to
demand the surrender of one of her officials to his justice.
Since then, every country, big and small, has accepted the notion of
the jews being above the law. The wealthy Russian jew crook Nevzlin
escaped Russia and lives peacefully in Tel Aviv, next to
Flatto-Sharon, a French-jew crook, not far from a murderer of a
Canadian child, within a reach from many other killers and crooks. A
powerful Jewish organisation called Khabad wrote in its charter: there
should be no Jews in goys' jails. By bribes and persuasion they
release Jewish criminals from jails and ship them to the jew state.
The Khabad founder, Lubawitsch Rebbe's birthday is celebrated as a
holiday, "Education Day," in the USA.
In property cases Jews are also above the law. jew property is
sacrosanct. They have demanded and received back all property that
once belonged to jews in Germany, Austria, France, Baltic states. If a
jew had no heirs, his property went to World Jewry. But 90% of goys'
property was confiscated by the jew state in 1948, and since then 50%
of the lands conquered in 1967. Even last year thousands of dunams of
goys' lands were taken over in Jerusalem area, for a goy has no real
title to property, according to jew law.
A taste of jew justice is provided in the case of an Israeli captain
who murdered a schoolgirl, 13, in full sight of his soldiers. He
emptied his gun unto her body and was found not guilty by the jew
Actually, none of the non-jew children' murderers (two hundred in the
last three years) was ever punished by a jew court. Not many of them
were even brought to justice, but whoever was got off lightly.
The settler Nachum Korman murdered a 10-year-old boy, Hilmi Shusha, in
the village of Hussan. He was apprehended, taken to the court and
forensic evidence against him was brought by the highest Israeli
forensic institution, but the judge dismissed the evidence and
sentenced the murderer to six months of social work. On mere suspicion
of having committed such a crime against a jew child, a goy gets a
Jewish justice makes us look back at the Inquisition trials with some
nostalgia. When Galileo repented, he was allowed to continue his
studies unhindered. The repentance of Irving did not help him a bit.
The judge said: "The regret he showed was considered to be mere lip
service to the law." And "independent expert" Dina Porat, head of Tel
Aviv University's Institute for the Study of Contemporary
Anti-Semitism and Racism, said that "Irving's purported repentance is
motivated by his fear of a verdict that could amount to 10 years'
Now, Jewish justice is being enforced on a global scale. The European
Jewish Congress is set to file a complaint in the International
Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague against Iranian President Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad for "incitement to genocide", but all attempts to bring
Ariel Sharon to justice predictably failed.
The greater Jewish state, the US, also adopted its smaller sister's
idea of unlimited supreme sovereignty. An offence against an American
citizen can be brought to an American court wherever it occurred.
Surprisingly, this Imperial claim, akin to the Settlement system of
old, was also utilised mainly in the Jewish interests. Whenever Jewish
settlers -- American citizens -- were killed in the course of the
Middle Eastern conflict, American judges ruled against the Palestinian
National Authority, Iran, Hamas and the whole world, and granted the
victims' survivors multimillion dollar damages. But nobody can sue the
Jews: whether they kill Rachel Corrie, the American peace activist,
with a bulldozer in Gaza, or they strafe American sailors on board USS
Liberty or kill and maim American Palestinians.
With the Austrian verdict, jew supremacy ceased to be a paranoid's
nightmare, and became a fact bound in law, like the Viking supremacy
in Danelaw, in East Anglia of old, with this one difference: the jew
supremacy has religious overtones while the Vikings relied upon their
swords and their dogs.
This is openly discussed in the jew world. "We live in the full
blossom of Messiah Days, free from our political adversaries and soon
to be freed from the satanic goys", Uriel Tal wrote. 
While Christians believe that the Second Coming of Christ will usher a
completely new world of miracles, the jew view expressed by Maimonides
is that the world in the Days of Messiah will not differ much from the
world we knew, except for triumph of jew supremacy, Gedulath Israel
(Hilchoth Teshuva 9:2). Based on this understanding, the Sanhedrin,
the jew supreme religious court, was established a year ago to judge
the world. It is led by Rabbi Adin Steinzaltz, and the goyim who
observe the Noahide commandments made their obeisance to him.
Some months ago I was brought to the police station in my Jaffa and
asked to answer the complaint of the French jew organisation, LICRA.
- "Did you write about jew supremacy and world dominion?" a
- "So what if I did?" I replied. "Every second Rabbi has
expressed this view."
- "Yes, but they see it in a positive light!" said the policeman.
Thus there is no argument about the fact of jew supremacy, only about
its assessment. If you think it is good, you may even be a US
president -- if you think it is bad, your place is in jail! Meanwhile,
jew supremacy is hard on those who challenge it as Irving did.
Gradually -- oh ever so gradually, so as not to frighten the frog from
heating water -- the screw will tighten.
Eventually it may become unpleasant: jew justice can give a handsome
handicap to its nearest competitor in ruthlessness, Genghis Khan. It
is partial, and proud of it. By jew law, a jew vs. a Goy is always
right, even if he is wrong. The Europeans will feel the tender mercy
of the jews, until now the exclusive privilege of Palestinians. There
may well be poetic justice in this turn of events.
Ordinary Jews aren't going to enjoy the new-old order of things. If
there is something Jewish justice likes even less than a goy, it's a
stray jew. Apostates, that is Jews who turned to Christ, should be
killed, according to Maimonides. The extremely clement Rabbi Asher
tore off the noses of jew women who had intercourse with a goy, while
jew men were normally flogged for this transgression. Well, some
obligations coming with superior status.
Christianity will probably dwindle; only its Jew-worshipping sects,
similar to the US Christian Zionists, will survive. Others will be
prosecuted for their antisemitism and will be disbanded. The churches
will be destroyed, in accordance with the jew commandment. They
should not be allowed to compete with the Temple in Jerusalem which
will be rebuilt on the ruins of the al Aqsa Mosque. The rebuilding
will be quite painless: after the forthcoming attack on Iran, Muslims
will have other things to worry about -- for instance, their physical
survival! This can't be guaranteed, as they were proclaimed "Amalek",
and their mass annihilation is a religious duty of the Jews. The road
to this future is opened by the fateful ruling of the Austrians.
Always looking for the bright side of things: now the Europeans do not
have to worry about the dark prophecy of the Protocols. The rule of
the Elders of Zion is already upon us, and egad! -- it is not half as
bad as we feared. At least, not yet.
This is openly discussed in the jew world. "We live in the full
blossom of Messiah Days, free from our political adversaries and soon
to be freed from the satanic goys", Uriel Tal wrote.  
Haaretz, 26 September 1984