| Email this article | Print this article | Link to this Article|
THE RIGHT OF RETURN IS ALIVE AND WELL - ?
January 20, 2002
What Israel (with continuing U.S. and European help) has done to the Palestinian People is the largest, most carefully planned and longest ethnic cleansing operation in modern history. The population of 530 towns and villages have been expelled in 1948, removing 85 per cent of the Palestinians in the land that became Israel. Those who did not suffer this fate in the remaining part of Palestine are now in the grip of the most brutal, longest and only occupation in the world."
Much else has happened in the world as well of course, but from the Palestinian point-of-view the Nakba (the Catastrophe) which originally lead to the refugee population which today amounts to more than half the Palestinian people (some 3.5 million), and then the subsequent occupation of the rest of historic Palestine (the West Bank and Gaza) in 1967, are in fact summarized in the above paragraph. There are many complexities to the overall situation, and to the history as well, but even so this is a large part of the reality and the underlying result, the refugees, must be dealt with in a serious way or there can never be a lasting solution to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict which has major dimensions also as an Arab-Israeli and now a Muslim-Israeli conflict -- dimensions that twist and change as the years go by.
THE RIGHT OF RETURN IS ALIVE AND WELL By Salman Abu Sitta
TWO COMPLEMENTARY words have become an integral part of the Palestinian narrative for the last 53 years: Al Nakba and the right of return. They represent two sides of the same coin: one is the original sin and the other is the atonement for it.
Al Nakba is the largest, most carefully planned and longest ethnic cleansing operation in modern history. The population of 530 towns and villages have been expelled in 1948, removing 85 per cent of the Palestinians in the land that became Israel. Those who did not suffer this fate in the remaining part of Palestine are now in the grip of the most brutal, longest and only occupation in the world.
The Palestinians' determination to hold on to their right of return during many years of unparalleled adversity is unique. Hence, the Israeli indefatigable efforts to undermine it. Their arguments have remained the same since the Provisional Government of Israel, buoyed by the conquest of vast territory, decided in June 1948 to declare publicly its intention to deny the return of the refugees by all means. The first victim of this policy, apart from the refugees themselves, was the assassinated Count Volke Bernadotte, whose political "will" became the famous Resolution 194 (III), para 11 of Dec. 11, 1948, significantly one day after the promulgation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR).
On the ground, Israel expelled the refugees, committed massacres, shot the returnees ("infiltrators"), destroyed the villages, burned the crops, imported immigrants and confiscated refugee property (92 per cent of Israel).
In the propaganda arena, Israel created new myths ("Palestine is a land without people"), such as: the return is not possible, the boundaries are lost, the country is full and the return will pollute "the Jewish character" of the state. None of these myths stand serious scrutiny or can be accepted as legitimate reasons for the denial of human rights.
In the legal interpretation of Resolution 194, attempts are made to undermine it by calling it a "recommendation" or casting doubts on the meaning of "country" and "home". Without serious examination of these claims, or under the guise of "pragmatism", some Palestinian officials and academics adopted these Israeli views. Free exchange of ideas is highly recommended. But undermining inalienable rights is not.
The much-publicised views of Sari Nusseibeh, first presented with an Israeli Likud co-author, Mark Heller, ten years ago, can be summed up as follows: The "recognised" right of return can be fulfilled by the "return" of the refugees to the new state of Palestine (definition unknown). The Palestinians should be citizens of their own (ethnic) state and the Israelis of their own (Jewish) state.
This confuses the concept of sovereignty over a territory, which is political and negotiable, and the right of return, which is an inalienable right and has nothing to do with the territory in question. The two are entirely unrelated. Further, there is no meaning in international law of a "Jewish" state or a Jewish people. The Partition Plan of 1947 (Resolution 181), on whose basis the state of Israel was declared, clearly rejects this concept and stipulates, in chapters 2 and 3, the protection of the full political and civil rights of the Arab "minority" in the Jewish state and vice versa. The state should protect all its citizens, whoever they may be. But Israel declares itself to be the state of those who are not its citizens (the Jews abroad) and not the state of its citizens (Palestinians in Israel). This racist concept is contrary to international law and cannot be accepted.
Doubts cast on the validity of Resolution 194 are a waste of time. The predominant legal opinion supports it. UN General Assembly Resolution 194 is not an invention; it is an application of international law. That is why it has been confirmed by the UN 135 times, a unique case in UN history. It is also derived from the UDHR and the European, American and African similar conventions. It is also derived from the sanctity of private ownership which cannot be extinguished by passage of time, occupation or sovereignty.
Contrary to an erstwhile misconception, the resolution, in line with the Compensation Law, calls for the return and (not or) compensation; the latter depends on the loss and damage with or without return.
Resolution 242 never eliminated Resolution 194. Evidence is clear from continuous reference to it up to the last General Assembly in November-December 2001. The reference in 242, which is dedicated only to the 1967 war effects, to "a just resolution of the refugee question", simply refers the matter to existing resolutions on the issue and to international law.
A Jordan Times contributor raised, on Dec. 30, 2001, the point, also raised by the Israelis, that the Arabs voted against Resolution 194. One needs to know why and how.
The Arab (Egypt, Iraq, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Yemen - Jordan is not mentioned) and the Soviet block voted against the whole resolution (not paragraph 11 - the right of return) because the package contains many ambiguous and unacceptable terms.
Resolution 194 contains 15 paragraphs, of which paragraph 11 refers to the refugees' return in a comprehensive plan of 3 elements: 1) to allow them to return and be compensated; 2) to provide welfare to refugees, later provided by UNRWA; and 3) to facilitate their repatriation and rehabilitation.
Other clauses refer to the internationalisation of Jerusalem, "economic development of the area" with vague and ill-defined terms of reference for CCP. Nothing was said about the then recent (October-November 1948) Israeli new conquest which increased the occupied land from 25 per cent to 60 per cent of Israel's area. The general context of the resolution appeared to support the partition resolution (already rejected by the Arabs because it allocates 54 per cent of the country to the Jewish minority which controlled only 6 per cent of Palestine), but, worse still, without any specific boundaries for Israel, which implied condoning Israeli unlimited expansion.
The Arabs never rejected paragraph 11, as evidenced by the proceeding at Lausanne in 1949. In fact, the Arabs accepted Israel as a state at the time, a major and rarely emphasised concession, provided that, first, refugees must return to their homes. The Lausanne Protocol, signed on May 12, 1949, stated this clearly and had an annex of the Partition Plan of 1947 as the basis of discussion. As American diplomatic despatches and the Record of the Meeting of May 12, 1949, indicate, the Arabs' prerequisite for recognising Israel is the return of the refugees. The only exception, according to these despatches (see Burdett, Feb. 12, 1949, FRUS 1949, pp. 744-746), was Jordan, which accepted to settle the refugees on its territory, but asked Israel to withdraw from a bigger territory in Palestine to be able to settle more refugees.
However, the whole question of Arab voting on Resolution 194 is moot. One can ask: So what? The right of return is an individual right which can only be surrendered by the individual himself. Through extension to self-determination, it is a collective right.
As to the international humanitarian law about the treatment of civilians in time of war, it is applicable to Al Nakba and to the present-day occupation of the West Bank and Gaza. The threat of applying the Rome Statute of 1998, which treats Jewish settlers, Israeli army officers and officials of the government of Israel as war criminals, should, when applied, be a serious deterrent to Israeli atrocities.
In the final analysis, the right of return remains the guiding light of the refugees with or without UN resolutions.
The writer is researcher on the refugees and president of Palestine Land Society, London.
Comment on these article(s)
Standing Ovation at U Chicago for MER Publisher Mark Bruzonsky Keynote Address. Full text at http://www.MiddleEast.Org/uchicago.htm
(January 31, 2002)
Standing Ovation at University of Chicago for MER Publisher Mark Bruzonsky Keynote Address. Full text at http://www.MiddleEast.Org/uchicago.htm
University of Chicago Speech by MER Publisher Mark Bruzonsky
(January 31, 2002)
Arab Client Regimes Shaking
(January 30, 2002)
The first thing they do is cover your eyes. They make you strip to make sure you're not carrying anything. They replace your clothes with uniforms that are not clothes at all. They chain you by hand and foot. They drag you away and leave you on your own. They interrogate you. They say you are going to die if you won't talk. They feed you - you're not much good to them if you starve to death.
Torture and the Smile of Policeman Agadi
(January 30, 2002)
A few years ago Dr. Eyad Sarraj startled many when he published an article explaining "Why We Are All Suicide Bombers Now". Dr. Sarraj, Ph.D. from Harvard in psychology and a very cultured and secular individual, is Palestinian and lives in Gaza.
Black Voices For Peace - The Good and the Bad
(January 29, 2002)
Black Voices for Peace in Washington put on a good show last Monday, Martin Luther King's Birthday.
For Blacks it was a well put-together and nicely produced program that went on for some 5 hours in a local downtown heart-of-D.C. church.
Arabs Threaten to Threaten; Israelis Act
(January 28, 2002)
The confused, bewildered, impotent, and divided Arab "leaders" -- mostly of course of the "client regimes" -- will be meeting in Beirut in March desperately trying even harder than usual to mask all of these realities.
Pakistan on Brink of Backlash, Chaos, War
(January 28, 2002)
India is likely to strike sooner or later, doing so on behalf of and in coordination with both Israel and the U.S. regardless of what those parties say in public. Whether India will wait for General Musharraf to loose control -- at that could come at any time -- is uncertain to everyone, probably including those in charge in New Delhi.
One War Criminal To Another
(January 27, 2002)
Fearing the possible public explosure of secrets known to very few, it appears one war criminal decided to do in another this week in Lebanon. The cycle of violence begetting violence, revenge leading to still more revenge, has not been broken in the Midldle East.
Zinni Embraces "Daddy Bear" Sharon Condemns "Mafia Godfather" Arafat
(January 27, 2002)
Americans and Israelis are essentially frolicking in bed together, all the more so in the aftermath of 11 September, all the while whispering under the covers about how they have truly screwed everyone else, most especially the gullible, weak, and confused Arabs from Arafat to Mubarak to Abdullah, et. al.
More Bloodshed Now; Possible Armagedon In The Future
(January 27, 2002)
At the moment Israel is Goliath in the Middle East; and American is Hercules in the world. But it will not always be this way; and the seeds of potential cataclysm, indeed of Armagadon, are in fact now growing like weed
U.S. Warns, Squeezes Arafat, Saudis
(January 26, 2002)
By threatening to desert the Arafat Regime the Americans are sending a much larger message to the rulers in the Middle East and especially at this moment to the Saudi Regime. The message: If you dare defy us, if you don't do what you are there to do, if you think you can get along without us support you; well think again.
Arafat Deserted; Region Boiling
(January 25, 2002)
The Arab "leaders" having deserted Yasser Arafat, as well as the Palestinian people. The terrible weakness and divisions of what is known as "the Arab world" are more visible than ever now.
Arafat Again In Exile? Oh No!
(January 24, 2002)
OH NO! Just the thought of Arafat going back into exile, continuing to hold to all the power and money and imagery, and traveling the world again with his sensely slogans, babbling ways, near zero credibility, and terrible record of corruption and ineptitude, is enough to make long-time supporters of the Palestinian struggle for true self-determination and real independence cringe.
Washington Gives Israelis the Wink and the Nod - Plus of course the Means
(January 24, 2002)
While the U.S. and Israeli military, and the CIA and Mossad, forge ever closer ties in the new crusade to remake the entire Middle East in the opening years of the 21st century, just as the Brits and the French did in the opening years of the last century, the Israelis also continue their assassination campaign not only of Palestinians but also of former friends and allies.
PERES, NOT PEACE-MAKER BUT CRIMINAL - Former Aide Charges
(January 23, 2002)
"Your silence and inaction can no longer be justified by
any excuse: Shimon, you are a partner in crime...
You have imprisoned an entire people for over a year
with a degree of cruelty unprecedented in the history
of the Israeli occupation. Your government is
trampling three million people..."
CONGRATULATIONS, AMERICA YOU HAVE MADE BIN LADEN A HAPPY MAN
(January 23, 2002)
"'We are turning ourselves into the kind of deceitful,
ruthless people whom bin Laden imagines us to be"
"Minus the torture, the United States is now doing what
most Arab regimes have been doing for decades:
arresting their brutal "Islamist" enemies, holding them
incommunicado, chained and hooded, while preparing unfair trials."
British Support for Israel and Sharon
(January 23, 2002)
Take the Middle East. When Blair welcomed Yasser Arafat to Downing Street following 11 September, it was widely reported that Britain was backing justice for the Palestinians. Editorialists drew a favourable comparison with the bellicose Bush administration.
SAUDI DENOUNCES U.S. AGENDA BEHIND BOMBING CAMPAIGN
(January 22, 2002)
From down under these two articles from the Sydney Morning Herald today, a newspaper with unusually thoughtful converage of world affairs. In Saudi Arabia there is a trembling now and a rush to try to distance themselves form the Americans one way or another.
Thousands of Al Qaeda and Pakistanis may have "escaped" Afghanistan; Bin Laden possibly among them
(January 21, 2002)
Kashmir remains the flashpoint. "The situation is bloody explosive," a senior Pakistani
diplomat says, suggesting that Musharraf has not been given enough credit by the Indian
government for the "sweeping changes" he's brought to Pakistan.
Thousands demand Arafat's release
(January 20, 2002)
Thousands of Palestinians marched through the Gaza Strip on Sunday protesting at the Israeli blockade of Yasser Arafat's headquarters in the West Bank town of Ramallah. The Israeli Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon, has said Mr Arafat is now effectively a prisoner of Israel.
THE RIGHT OF RETURN IS ALIVE AND WELL - ?
(January 20, 2002571570)
What Israel (with continuing U.S. and European help) has done to the Palestinian People "is the largest, most carefully planned and longest ethnic cleansing operation in modern history. The population of 530 towns and villages have been expelled in 1948, removing 85 per cent of the Palestinians in the land that became Israel. Those who did not suffer this fate in the remaining part of Palestine are now in the grip of the most brutal, longest and only occupation in the world."
America grabs for more power and domination, risks future revolution and explosion
(January 16, 2002)
Just as it did in the Middle East in years past, the U.S. is now positioning regimes and its military and economic tentacles to take in the riches of central Asia. That's really what these struggles are really all about in the end, power and wealth. The daily headlines and the various slogans and clashes actually serve to mask and obscure this far deeper and far more important reality.
Hezbollah and Lebanon Next U.S./Israeli Targets
(January 15, 2002566)
The Americans, and Israelis, are out of control now. The rather laughable "Arab League" is in fact scheduled to meet in Beirut in March. They may find themselves facing the wrath and revenge of the Americans who are determined to make the world safe for themselves and the Israelis, and unsafe for all who dare oppose the Empire.
Christian Americans Want Crusade - Was/Is Osama Right?
(January 13, 2002)
George W. Bush let it out of the bag less than a week after 911 when he publicly discussed the new "crusade" upon which American was now engaged. They shut him up quickly...in public anyway. And as for all that American help to the Afghani people... The reality is millions are on the verge of starvation and the country can be lickened to a "slaughterhouse". Someone should ask the Vietnamese, Cambodians, Laotians, Iraqis...etc. about American humanitarian assistance.
Arab nations leaving Palestinians to face Israel alone
(January 12, 2002)
"The Arab world is unlikely to remain backward and divided forever," says one of the quoted commentators. True enough. But while it does, and while it is saddled with the inept and corrupt "client regimes" who prey on their own people and miserably squander the resources, the culture, and the history, of this once vital region, the whole Middle East is a seething cauldron of still growing hatreds and grievances whose eruptions in the 21st century now well begun are likely to be far greater than all those of the bloody 20th century now past.
Toward a World at War - Syria Fears, Indians Prepare
(January 10, 2002)
While the Syrians, Iraqis and others prepare for the coming American strikes; and while the Indians and Pakistanis prepare for a possible cataclysmic clash; the Israelis are preparing to further manipulate American policies and also preparing to strike out on their own against all who oppose their brutal military subjugation of the Palestinians -- probably to do so when other even bigger fires elsewhere have much of the world's attention.
US Military Heads For Pakistan, Reorganizes to Remain in Region, Prepare the Way for Global American Companies
(January 9, 2002)
The U.S. military is preparing to go much more publicly into Pakistan, and to establish a long-term presence in the region. The American corporations and banks will soon follow. For in the end its really all about great wealth and power on a global scale.
Attack Syria Next Insists Former NATO Commander and White House Chief of Staff
(January 8, 2002)
Target Syria even before Iraq says former NATO Commander and White House Chief of Staff Alexander Haig. American is on the loose, on the rampage, more and more dangerous all the time it seems.
Saudi royal family 'in complete panic' during recent riots
(January 6, 2002)
SUBJUGATING BOTH KASHMIR and PALESTINE
(January 5, 2002)
Both Kashmir and Palestine are bleeding badly. And in the new world of Pax America and the "War on Terrorism" the Israelis are intent on keeping the Palestinians essentially imprisoned on Bantustans while the Indians see this as their moment to undermine the liberation struggle in Kashmir.
The New "New World Order" - Israel and India Gleefully Follow America's Lead
(January 4, 2002)
Both India and Israel are now seizing the moment to enforce their own regional dictate, a la the Americans. Everything is
reduced to "they are terrorists". The "you are either with us or against us" mantra has been gleefully seized upon by those who
rule in Delhi and Jerusalem. The courageous fighters in Kashmir, along with those in Palestine, are ever so simplistically and
erroneous reduced to mini-caricatures of Osama bin Laden. Decades of U.N. resolutions demanding Israeli and Indian
recognition of basic Palestinian and Kashmiri rights are cast to the wind. Any semblance of historical awareness -- not to
mention real justice, freedom, and democracy -- is not only forgotten but even those who raise the issues and remind the world
of the complex historical context, not to mention those who try to help with tangible and financial assistance, now run the risk of
being branded "supporters of terrorism"
CIA, Israel, and Arafat force Palestinian newspaper to close
(January 3, 2002544)
"If you're not with us, you're against us." The CIA, the Mossad, the Shinbet, and the military -- these are the groups now in charge. And that of course is what happens when a regime like that of Yasser Arafat's puts its fate, and indeed its very survival, in the hands of the intelligence agencies and under the table financial and political deals that would never be possible if they were known.
Both India and Kashmiri Fighters Issue New Threats
(January 2, 2002)
Threat and Counter-threat in the Sub-continent while Pakistan is essentially an occupied country at this point. General President Musharraff has allowed U.S. forces into the country, the CIA is building up its presence, and tensions throughout Pakistan are growing. There are rumored "contingency" plans to either destroy or grab Pakistan's nuclear weapons should Musharraf's tenuous grip on power in coordination with the U.S. fail.
Israel and U.S. Get Ready To Finally Topple Iraqi Regime
(January 2, 2002540)
It's the CIA, Mossad, and the military that are in charge now; preparing to enforce a Pax Americana Israelica throughout the Middle East region.
The Terribly Bloody Year In Kashmir
(January 2, 2002)
The Kashmir crisis is at the heart of the clash which may or may not yet erupt into nuclear confrontation on the sub-continent. For additional information about the Kashmir crisis use the new search capabilities and check the MER archives.