Mid-East Realitieswww.middleeast.org

THE U.S. MAKES IT ALL POSSIBLE

August 29, 2001

MID-EAST REALITIES © - MER - www.MiddleEast.Org - Washington - 8/29: What we should all be thinking when the U.S. State Department spokesman gets in front of the cameras is -- "You've Got To Be Kidding!" Instead, the American government with its super sophisticated PR apparatus dishes it out. The gullible, or should we say complicitous, corporate media then broadcasts it -- not just CNN, also the rest of the networks along with PBS followed up by the big daily newspapers and newsweeklies --all lemming-like. And when it comes to matters Middle Eastern, the Arab client regimes in the region -- in most cases U.S.-sponsored and controlled -- then put it on their TV screens and in their newspapers. What it all means at the end of the day is that the American government continually gets away with murder and subjugation -- with a great deal of help from the media including from the very representatives of the victims! Gee (with a smirk)...maybe we need Connie Chung to grill the Secretary of State about really weighty and historical matters, rather than a lowly Congressman and his once secret sex life.

Now let's be very clear about this. The Israelis could not, not to mention would not be able to for long, do what they are doing if they did not have the American green light. It is American money, guns, technology -- along with America's major institutions including the Pentagon, CIA and NSA -- that have made it possible for the Israelis to occupy the Palestinians and to dominate the Arabs for decades now. As for the idea, floated yesterday as the article that follows indicates, that a report might be made to Congress about the use of American arms by Israel...yawn... Well, as we already said once: "You've Got To Be Kidding!" Oh yah, after all these years, after all this death and destruction, they might get around to writing a little report -- just as they have done over the years about human rights, about torture, and indeed about arms in the past. So what! There were secret State Department documents detailing the systematic Israeli torture of Palestinians as far back as 1979, reports which in fact the publisher of MER then published in The Middle East Magazine in London of which he was then the Interview Editor -- verified secret and classified documents that the complicitous American press refused to publish and which of course the government and Congress refused to act upon. And today the Congress is more controlled and more manipulated by the powerful and sophisticated Israeli-Jewish lobby than ever -- indeed Congress is also Israeli-occupied territory.

Even as U.S. helicopter gunships assassinate Palestinian leaders with precision-guided missiles, and as U.S. supplied tanks and war planes are used to ratchet up still further the brutal occupation, a high-level delegation of the Israeli military is actually at the Pentagon under guise of "the strategic relationship" coordinating everything. If anyone still thinks that the "critical" and "disassociating" and "peace process" words coming from the U.S. Department of State are anything other than smokescreens attempting to disguise the basic fact that it is the U.S. and Israel together doing what is being done, well...damn it..."It's the U.S. Stupid!"

U.S. WARNS ISRAEL ON USE OF AMERICAN-MADE ARMS
By ABCNEWS.com

A Bush administration says the State Department could soon determine Israel is violating American law.

[Tuesday August 28 08:26 PM EDT] - The United States has warned Israel that a report may have to be sent to Congress indicating it is improperly using American-made weapons for killing Palestinian leaders, a senior State Department official told ABCNEWS today.

The Arms Export Control Act requires that U.S.-supplied weapons obtained by foreign countries be used only for "legitimate self-defense." In the event of substantial violations, the executive branch is required to notify Congress.

Congress would have to decide if it wanted to impose some sort of punishment.

Palestinians argue recent attacks by helicopters and fighter aircraft were offensive operations. The Israeli government contends they were defensive, targeting the planners of recurring terror attacks against Israel citizens.

So far, the U.S. government has not decided whether American arms are being misused. "We have not made any determination or decisions that the provisions of the law might have been violated," said State Department spokesman Richard Boucher. He noted the act also permits use of U.S. weapons for "internal security."

Boucher said U.S. officials were not urging the Israelis to stop using U.S. weapons for the killings, per se, but rather, to stop the attacks altogether. "The focus of our discussions with the Israelis is on calming the situation and ending the violence. That remains the subject of discussion," he said.

But he added, "We do think that the use of heavy weaponry in populated areas runs a high risk of civilian casualties, and we have been opposed to it."

The issue has become an increasingly thorny one for the United States government, drawing increased condemnation from Arab countries.

"It does have a negative factor in the region, when the Arabs equate Israeli killings with the United States," says Robert Malley of the Center for Middle East Peace.

The United States is the principal supplier of weapons to Israel, providing some $5.2 billion in arms over the last four years, financed largely by annual grants of military aid by Congress. Such weapons include F-15 and F-16 fighter aircraft and attack helicopters.

In recent days, senior U.S. officials, including President Bush, have used increasingly stronger language to urge the Israelis to stop the targeted killings, arguing that they undermine efforts to make peace between the two sides and hamper efforts to prevent an all-out Middle East war from raging.

But those admonitions went ignored Monday, when U.S.-made Apache helicopters were used to target and kill a senior Palestinian activist. — Martha Raddatz at the State Department and David Ruppe contributed to this report.

ISRAEL EXPANDS ITS MILITARY RE-OCCUPATION
OF THE BETHLEHEM AREA

[BADIL Resource CenterBeit Jala, 29 August 2001, 01:00 p.m.] The partial Israeli re-occupation of the Palestinian town of Beit Jala and adjacent areas, including the north-western border of Aida refugee camp, has entered its second day. After more than 35 hours of violent battles between the Israeli occupation army and the Palestinian resistance, and in the absence of determined international intervention, the outcome of this new escalation in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict remains uncertain.

How long will the Israeli forces remain in the area? Although Israeli media reported that the Sharon government informed the US and European governments that this military operation will be a matter of no more than several hours, Israeli government and army spokespersons argue that authorization for the re-invasion of the Palestinian areas south of the Gilo settlement was given by the "security cabinet" two-and-a-half weeks ago without limitation in time and specifying only the aim: to assure that Palestinian shooting at the Gilo settlement will be terminated once for all. This aim has not been achieved. To the contrary, shooting at the Gilo settlement from the larger Beit Jala and Bethlehem area has reached an unprecedented scope, including light and heavy ammunition, as well a mortars, in response to the Israeli escalation. Moreover, the Sharon government and its army commanders have never clarified the ways and means by which the current "limited Israeli presence" should lead to a halt of the shooting at the Gilo settlement.

Events on the ground (28-29 August): By the noon of 29 September, several new steps indicate that Israel is about to expand its operation by closing in on the Bethlehem area from the south. The positions taken in the north-western Beit Jala area by the Israeli occupation army at the time of its initial incursion in the early morning hours of 28 August have remained unchanged. Israeli tanks and artillery are stationed in the upper section of the town of Beit Jala (some 300 meters into Palestinian controlled "area A") and on the northern border of Aida refugee camp, in addition to the previously existing military bases below the Gilo settlement and at the entrance to Bethlehem. The Israeli occupation army thus controls the north-western area of Beit Jala and Bethlehem and has imposed a curfew on its Palestinian residents. Fierce Palestinian resistance has prevented Israeli movement beyond this area, and frequent attempts to enter further into the adjacent Aida refugee camp have so far been stopped.

Today, at around 11:45, Israeli tanks coming from the Israeli Jerusalem-Hebron road (Road no. 60) rolled into the Palestinian village of Al-Khader, located on the southern boarder of Bethlehem. As of now, the Israeli army has re-occupied an area reaching from the Pools of Suleiman until the old town of Al-Khader. Despite the curfew imposed there, Palestinian residents are trying to resist, using light weapons, Molotov cocktails and kitchen gas bottles in order to encounter the assault. News about Israeli plans to re-occupy the UNRWA operated and internationally protected Aida refugee camp are causing much apprehension in the camp.

Contrary to Israeli assertions that Palestinian civilians, their property, as well as holy sites will not be harmed, suffering and damages are substantial. Israeli tanks withdrew only late last night from the courtyard of Beit Jala's Lutheran church, after holding hostage some 50 Palestinian orphans - confined to one room without food and drink - for a whole day. Also last night, Israeli forces entered the mosque located next to the church, using it as a military position since then. Since yesterday morning, Muhammad Hassan al Masheikheh and his family counting 20 members have been forced to share their home on the northern edge of Aida refugee camp with a dozen of Israeli soldiers who took position in their house. Efforts by the camp residents in coordination with the ICRC and UNRWA to obtain the release of the family have so far remained futile. This morning, Israeli bulldozers destroyed the adjacent wall of the Armenian monastery, and prepared new access roads towards the camp for army vehicles. Two Palestinian resistance fighters (one member of the Palestinian security forces, one civilian, resident of Aida refugee camp) have so far been killed in the confrontations. More than 30 persons are reported injured, several cars belonging to civilians have been destroyed, and an unknown number of Palestinian homes have been damaged. Armed confrontations between the Israeli occupier and the Palestinian resistance continue until this moment. Social and economic life in the Bethlehem-Beit Jala area is paralyzed, public service institutions operate only partially, and Palestinian schools, scheduled to re-open this week have remained closed.

The initial partial and limited Israeli re-occupation of Palestinian controlled lands cannot achieve the declared aim, i.e. halt Palestinian shooting on the Gilo settlement, in the short and medium term. Therefore, the Israeli operation must be seen as part of the long-term strategy of the Sharon government, which has been outlined extensively by Israeli commentators in yesterday's Israeli news programs. The declared aim is to gradually re-occupy all or most of the areas designated as Palestinian controlled areas under the Oslo Accords, and to crush Palestinian resistance by means of extra- judicial killings, arrests and deportation of its leaders. These measures are to be accompanied by an international public relations campaign aiming to further de-legitimize the aims and persons guiding the Palestinian struggle for internationally recognized rights. In this context, it does not matter much whether Israel will eventually be forced by the international community to withdraw from the areas it currently re-occupied in the Beit Jala and Bethlehem area. What matters for the Israeli government is its ability to establish a new fact, i.e. that the international community accepts Israeli invasion and re-occupation whenever Israel identifies a need to do so, i.e. to re-introduce the normality of direct military occupation, even if the price is the immediate and long term escalation of the conflict, human suffering and an uncertain future for Palestinians and Israelis in the region.


Mid-East Realitieswww.middleeast.org

Source: http://www.middleeast.org/articles/2001/8/365.htm