Mid-East Realitieswww.middleeast.org

If you don't get MER, you just don't get it!
(202) 362-5266 - 12 July 2004 - MER@MiddleEast.Org
News, Views, & Analysis Governments, Lobbies, & the
Corporate Media Don't Want You To Know
The most honest, most comprehensive, and most mobilizing news and analysis
on the Middle East always comes from MER. It is indispensable!"
Robert Silverman - Salamanca, Spain
MER is Free
Comment on this and other MER articles in the MER FORUM

OSAMA STRIKES AGAIN

Bush Declares and Renews Pre-Emptive Unilateralism


Mid-East Realities - MER - www.MiddleEast.Org - 12 July 2004:


It wasn't that long ago that the idea the Supreme Court would select the American President in a highly divisive and totally unprecedented 5-4 decision, with squadrons of Democrats and Republicans out-front-of-the-court screaming at each other across police lines; that would have been 'unthinkable' not that long ago.

The notion that both of the World Trade Towers would collapse within an hour of each other after being struck by hijacked aircraft and that the President of the United States would then be afraid to fly back to Washington; that would have been 'unthinkable' just a few years ago.

The idea that the U.S. would have an extensive network of secret prisons, secret quasi-puppet courts, and a veritable gulag of prisoners held without charges, without lawyers, and without recourse; all this would have been unthinkable before the 'Patriot Act' put the U.S. into police-state mood.

The idea that Ronald Reagan would be addressing the Democratic National Convention in prime time (Jr. that is) would have been 'unthinkable' just a few weeks ago.

And now...the truly 'unthinkable' for Americans. From his hideing place whereever that may be Osama Bin Laden has U.S. officials, and now the American people, actually contemplating and chatting about 'postponing' The American election...if...

We're now on an 'unthinkable' roll; and much more 'unthinkable' can now be expected in the months and years ahead.




Election Day Worries

Exclusive: - Newsweek - July 19 issue:
American counterterrorism officials, citing what they call "alarming" intelligence about a possible Qaeda strike inside the United States this fall, are reviewing a proposal that could allow for the postponement of the November presidential election in the event of such an attack, NEWSWEEK has learned.

The prospect that Al Qaeda might seek to disrupt the U.S. election was a major factor behind last week's terror warning by Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge. Ridge and other counterterrorism officials concede they have no intel about any specific plots. But the success of March's Madrid railway bombings in influencing the Spanish elections—as well as intercepted "chatter" among Qaeda operatives—has led analysts to conclude "they want to interfere with the elections," says one official.

As a result, sources tell NEWSWEEK, Ridge's department last week asked the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel to analyze what legal steps would be needed to permit the postponement of the election were an attack to take place. Justice was specifically asked to review a recent letter to Ridge from DeForest B. Soaries Jr., chairman of the newly created U.S. Election Assistance Commission. Soaries noted that, while a primary election in New York on September 11, 2001, was quickly suspended by that state's Board of Elections after the attacks that morning, "the federal government has no agency that has the statutory authority to cancel and reschedule a federal election." Soaries, a Bush appointee who two years ago was an unsuccessful GOP candidate for Congress, wants Ridge to seek emergency legislation from Congress empowering his agency to make such a call. Homeland officials say that as drastic as such proposals sound, they are taking them seriously—along with other possible contingency plans in the event of an election-eve or Election Day attack. "We are reviewing the issue to determine what steps need to be taken to secure the election," says Brian Roehrkasse, a Homeland spokesman. -Michael Isikoff


Bush asserts pre-emptive strikes policy
By Edward Alden in Washington

Financial Times - UK - July 12 2004:

President George W. Bush said on Monday his administration would maintain its policy of pre-empting potential security threats despite growing doubts over the adequacy of US intelligence to assess such dangers.

In a speech at the Oak Ridge nuclear facility in Tennessee, Mr Bush made clear he would not rethink the approach after Friday's damning report by the Senate intelligence committee. The report concluded that the Central Intelligence Agency made serious errors in asserting that Saddam Hussein's Iraq possessed or was developing weapons of mass destruction.

While acknowledging that the report "has identified some shortcomings in our intelligence capabilities", he said that would not cause him to reconsider the approach that led the US to invade Iraq.

"America must remember the lessons of September the 11th," Mr Bush said. "We must confront serious dangers before they fully materialise."

The president said that before the US went to war with Iraq, the administration, Congress and the United Nations Security Council all agreed intelligence showed that Iraq posed a serious threat.

"Although we have not found stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction, we were right to go into Iraq," Mr Bush said. The war removed an enemy "who had the capability of producing weapons of mass murder and could have passed that capability to terrorists".

The Senate findings have fueled an already bitter election-year debate over Iraq, even though John Kerry, the Democratic presidential hopeful, and John Edwards, his running mate, both voted for the Senate resolution authorising war against Iraq.

Mr Kerry said on the weekend that the Senate findings bolster his argument that Mr Bush misled the country in launching a war that has hurt the US. He refused, however, to reconsider his vote, saying that "based on the information we had, it was the correct vote".

But Dick Cheney, the vice president, accused the Democrats on Monday of developing "a convenient case of campaign amnesia". He said Mr Kerry and Mr Edwards "are criticising the president for looking at the same information that they did and coming to the same conclusion that [he] did. If the president was right, and he was, then they are simply trying to rewrite history for their own political purposes."

Mr Bush's trip to Oak Ridge, where remnants of Libya's dismantled nuclear programme are being stored, was aimed at bolstering the argument that his strategy of pre-emption has made America more secure. He said his administration was "leading a steady, confident, systematic campaign against the dangers of our time", which has thinned the ranks of the terrorists.


Comment on this and other MER articles in the MER FORUM

Please forward MER articles to others in their entirety with proper attribution.
We welcome your comments and information in the new MER FORUM.

MID-EAST REALITIES
www.MiddleEast.Org
Phone: (202) 362-5266
Fax: (815) 366-0800
Copyright © 2004 Mid-East Realities, All rights reserved


If you don't get MER,
you just don't get it!

MER is free
Click here to subscribe by email


Mid-East Realitieswww.middleeast.org

Source: http://www.middleeast.org/articles/2004/7/1015.htm