Mid-East Realitieswww.middleeast.org

 

3 July 2005        Free

www.MiddleEast.Org
News, Views, & Analysis Governments, Lobbies, & the
Corporate Media Don't Want You To Know

"The most honest, most comprehensive, and most mobilizing news and analysis on the Middle East always comes from MER.   It is indispensable!"
      
Robert Silverman





BUSH LIED
WITHDRAW FROM IRAQ

'Bush tried keeping the wool over our eyes again Tuesday on national TV by repeatedly tying Iraq to 9/11. That charge is as phony as his discredited prewar claim that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction.”

"We must fully support our servicemen and women and put their lives at risk only for honest and just and noble causes.”
     Founder of  USA TODAY,
       Al Neuharth



IMPEACHMENT SENTIMENT

"...more than two-in-five (42%) voters say that, if it is found that President Bush did not tell the truth about his reasons for going to war with Iraq, Congress should hold him accountable through impeachment. While half (50%) of respondents do not hold this view, supporters of impeachment outweigh opponents in some parts of the country."







MER FORUM

For your comments







MER
P.O. Box 4918
Washington, DC 20008

(202) 362-5266 phone
(815) 366-0800 fax
MER@MiddleEast.Org

Free  




IRAQ QUAGMIRE INDEED
Political Legal Fireworks
About to Erupt in Washington


MER - MiddleEast.Org - Washington - 3 July:  When the Founder of the country's largest newspaper, USA TODAY, takes on the cause of getting the country to withdraw from Iraq, maybe a tipping point is within reach.
    In an interview with
Editor and Publisher a few days ago Al Neuharth recalled when CBS Anchorman Walter Cronkite turned against the Vietnam  in 1968.   By noting that the difference today is that we have no Cronkite, Neuharth is also saying two further things.  First that in an era of fragmented and omni-present media it's much harder than ever for anyone to focus the public's attention.  Second that he is putting himself forward for the Cronkite roll this time, however many aspects of the situation are different today.
      Meanwhile the biggest political / legal fireworks of the Bush Pesidency is about to erupt in Washington right after the Fourth of July fireworks on the Mall.
     The Democrats are gunning for no less than the President's top man, Karl Rove.  It's partial pay-back for what was done to Bill Clinton.  It's more about weakening the Bush Administration and holding the Evangelicals and Neocons in check hoping to scatter and depart them in both the mid-term and then the 2008 election.
      In the week ahead the journalist notes that both TIME Magazine and the NYTimes insisted they would not turn over to the grand jury investigating who in government leaked the name of a secret CIA agent will result in Karl Rove being personally fingered as the source.  Rumors and speculation are one thing.  Now there is about to be a legal-process 'smoking gun'.
      Democrats will demand a Special Prosecutor and they will push and push for Rove to resign and face the music.  Of course the White House will dissemble and delay and resist.
       One way the Bush White House will respond is that a few days later they will put up for the Supreme Court a 'qualified' but also a sound right-winger for the Supreme Court.  They will in this way challenge the Democrats to fight hoping to at least deflect some of the media glare in Washington away from the Rove matter as well of course as away from the Iraq war and the economy.
     Blame the Neocons, the Christian Evangelicals, and the hard-line right-wing Jewish Zionists who all together now have thought they had Washington power finally in their hands to do as they wished.   
     A new time of blood-letting  in Washington -- on top of the blood-letting in the foreign killing-fields -- is being brought on by their Iraq war on top of their zealotous ideological fervor and hubris.
    This political blood-letting in the capital of the United States is far less direct and visible than what the Americans have induced on the streets of the Middle East.  But it is also extraordinarily damaging and threatening of the future of us all.




Neuharth Calls For U.S. Withdrawal from Iraq, Says Bush 'Lied'

NEW YORK  - Editor&Publisher -  1 July.    USA Today founder Al Neuharth, who caused a stir last year when -- a bit ahead of the curve -- he told E&P that he favored a U.S. withdrawal from Iraq, re-iterated his position Friday, with even more force.

“I'm convinced the best way to support our troops in Iraq is to bring them home. Sooner rather than later,” Neuharth, a Bronze Star winner in World War II, declared. He also compared President Bush to President Lyndon B. Johnson, saying that both presidents “lied to us in wartime.”

Neuharth added, in his weekly column Friday in the newspaper he founded: “The crucial difference between Vietnam and Iraq is that there is no Cronkite to call Bush's bluff. Without a strong, trusted, non-political voice, too many of us remain Bush-blinded. Bush tried keeping the wool over our eyes again Tuesday on national TV by repeatedly tying Iraq to 9/11. That charge is as phony as his discredited prewar claim that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction.”

Pointing to his own experience, Neuharth wrote: “Most of us who have had personal war experiences strongly believe this great country is worth fighting for at risk of lives. My World War II Bronze Star and Combat Infantryman's Badge on the wall behind my desk remind me of that daily.

"They also remind me that war is hell, that we must fully support our servicemen and women and put their lives at risk only for honest and just and noble causes.”


 
   No Bounce: Bush Job Approval Unchanged by War Speech;
   
Question on Impeachment Shows Polarization of Nation;

  
Americans Tired of Divisiveness in Congress - Want Bi-Partisan Solution
   

    New Zogby Poll - Thursday 30 June 2005

    President Bush's televised address to the nation produced no noticeable bounce in his approval numbers, with his job approval rating slipping a point from a week ago, to 43%, in the latest Zogby International poll. And, in a sign of continuing polarization, more than two-in-five voters (42%) say they would favor impeachment proceedings if it is found the President misled the nation about his reasons for going to war with Iraq.

    The Zogby America survey of 905 likely voters, conducted from June 27 through 29, 2005, has a margin of error of +/-3.3 percentage points.

    Just one week ago, President Bush's job approval stood at a previous low of 44% - but it has now slipped another point to 43%, despite a speech to the nation intended to build support for the Administration and the ongoing Iraq War effort. The Zogby America survey includes calls made both before and after the President's address, and the results show no discernible "bump" in his job approval, with voter approval of his job performance at 45% in the final day of polling.

    Where voters live has some impact on their perceptions. The President's job rating remains relatively strong in the South, with 51% rating his performance favorably; in all other regions, those disapproving his performance are in the majority.

    In a more significant sign of the weakness of the President's numbers, more "Red State" voters - that is, voters living in the states that cast their ballots for the Bush-Cheney ticket in 2004 - now rate his job performance unfavorably, with 50% holding a negative impression of the President's handling of his duties, and 48% holding a favorable view. The President also gets negative marks from one-in-four (25%) Republicans - as well as 86% of Democrats and 58% of independents. (Bush nets favorable marks from 75% of Republicans, 13% of Democrats and 40% of independents.)

    Impeachment Question Shows Bitterness of Divide

    In a sign of the continuing partisan division of the nation, more than two-in-five (42%) voters say that, if it is found that President Bush did not tell the truth about his reasons for going to war with Iraq, Congress should hold him accountable through impeachment. While half (50%) of respondents do not hold this view, supporters of impeachment outweigh opponents in some parts of the country.

    Among those living in the Western states, a 52% majority favors Congress using the impeachment mechanism while just 41% are opposed; in Eastern states, 49% are in favor and 45% opposed. In the South, meanwhile, impeachment is opposed by three-in-five voters (60%) and supported by just one-in-three (34%); in the Central/Great Lakes region, 52% are opposed and 38% in favor.

    Impeachment is overwhelmingly rejected in the Red States - just 36% say they agree Congress should use it if the President is found to have lied on Iraq, while 55% reject this view; in the "Blue States" that voted for Massachusetts Democrat John Kerry in 2004, meanwhile, a plurality of 48% favors such proceedings while 45% are opposed.

    A large majority of Democrats (59%) say they agree that the President should be impeached if he lied about Iraq, while just three-in-ten (30%) disagree. Among President Bush's fellow Republicans, a full one-in-four (25%) indicate they would favor impeaching the President under these circumstances, while seven-in-ten (70%) do not. Independents are more closely divided, with 43% favoring impeachment and 49% opposed.

    Americans Tiring of Partisan Division on Capital Hill

    The same survey finds that a 55% majority of voters believe the two parties are too focused on their respective bases, and as a result, compromise - and results - have become impossible in Washington. Just 36% in the poll rejected that notion, saying the parties' organization provides as broad a base as possible, and that compromise is occurring.

    A follow-up question found that seven-in-ten (70%) voters believe the parties should be broad-based, and should pursue compromise - while less than one-in-four (23%) favored putting base issues first, even if it means nothing is accomplished.

    These views are held by members of both major political parties, as well as independents, although Republicans, whose party controls both houses of Congress, are more likely to favor the parties focusing on the desires of their base than are Democrats and independents, with 31% of Republicans favoring this approach - more than the 20% of Democrats and 17% of independents who hold that view.

    Pollster John Zogby: "The nation continues to be split down the middle but there appears to be a deep and growing concern about how polarized we are. The President tried to address the situation on the ground in Iraq and hoped to allay the fears of the nation. It looks like that did not happen. Meanwhile, opposition to the war reveals that Americans are just as hostile and intense as they were the day after the 2004 election. The message seems to be pretty clear for Mr. Bush: lay off the partisan rhetoric and work to find compromise solutions."



MID-EAST REALITIES  -  www.MiddleEast.Org
Phone: (202) 362-5266     Fax: (815) 366-0800
 
Email: MER@MiddleEast.Org
Copyright © 2005 Mid-East Realities, All rights reserved

Free                             


The most honest, most comprehensive, and most mobilizing news and
analysis on the Middle East always comes from MER.   It is indispensable!"
Robert Silverman - Salamanca, Spain

 


Mid-East Realitieswww.middleeast.org

Source: http://www.middleeast.org/articles/2005/7/1296.htm