2 April 2004
NEWSFLASH
News, Views, & Analysis Governments, Lobbies, & the Corporate Media Don't Want You To Know
www.MiddleEast.Org - 202 362-5266 - MER@MiddleEast.Org
"The most honest, most comprehensive, and most mobilizing news
  and analysis on the Middle East always comes  from MER. 

It is indispensable!" - Robert Silverman - Salamanca, Spain

WHITE HOUSE COVER-UP!

IS CONNI NOW CORNERED?

The claim by the National Security Adviser, Condoleezza Rice,
that there was no such information was "an outrageous lie".  Sibel
Edmonds said she spent more than three hours in a closed session
with the commission's investigators providing information that was
circulating within the FBI in the spring and summer of 2001 suggesting
that an attack using aircraft was just months away and the terrorists
were in place. The Bush administration, meanwhile, has sought to silence
her and has obtained a gagging order from a court by citing the
rarely used "state secrets privilege".


MER - Mid-East Realities - www.MiddleEast.Org - Washington - 4/02/2004:
    
Readers of MER read this story nearly a week ago now!   In this past week the U.S. government has been working overtime to silence her, as well as the hundreds of other translators who daily work to translate the many phone and email intercepts now secretly gathered up by the government.   Indeed, this whole matter takes on potentially explosive implications with the National Security Adviser having finally agreed to testify in public under oath; and for that reason this story is only now emerging into the 'mainstream' corporate media pushed further forward by today's Independent in Great Britain.
    
Here is our MER commentary about this potentially explosive revelation when we first published it last week with the heading "9/11 Coverup!":

[MER - 27 March 2004]:
The tough and potentially explosive questions aren't really being asked by the 9/11 Commission.  And that's because the Commisson is controlled and staffed by the very same two parties that have so much to hide and coverup.  That's what "bi-partisan" really means in Washington these days in fact.   Among the key questions that should be asked and seriously investigated are:

* Was the Bush Administration spending most of its time preparing for what they wanted to do when the long-expected attack of some kind finally came; and thus was there a kind of hand-wringing waiting for the very terror that finally did come so that these ready-to-go policies could then be unleashed?

*  What role have Israeli policies played in provoking attacks against the U.S.; and what behind-the-scenes role have the many personalities associated with the Israeli/Jewish lobby played in then pushing the U.S. government to pursue policies desired by Israel.

*  Just who in the U.S. government is really responsible for the massive "intelligence failure" and for repeatedly and erroneously pushing the notion that Iraq was an imminent threat with terrifying stockpiles of chemical, biological, and soon to come nuclear weapons.

*  Just who are the top neocons in the Bush NSC, CIA, Pentagon, and State Department and who pushed them into the key positions they now hold -- Abrams, Feith, Wolfowitz, Perle, Frum, et. al.   And just what are the connections of these and other key operatives with such Israeli/Jewish lobby groups including AIPAC, JINSA, and Israeli-oriented PACs.


Now add to these additional questions:

*  Why did the FBI and the White House totally cover-up this information until now?

Who ordered the 'gagging order' against the courageous FBI translator who came forward to testify?

*  Have all of the hundreds of secret translators, and supervisors, now been questioned by the 9/11 Commission or are they under gagging orders and potential threat?   And if not, WHY not?

How is it possible the National Security Adviser told the nation after 9/11 that "no one could have imagined using planes as missiles to attack building?"   To this day she has never reasonably explained.

'I saw papers that show US knew al-Qa'ida would attack cities with aeroplanes'

Whistleblower the White House wants to silence speaks to The Independent

By Andrew Buncombe in Washington

[The Independent - 02 April 2004]:     A former translator for the FBI with top-secret security clearance says she has provided information to the panel investigating the 11 September attacks which proves senior officials knew of al-Qa'ida's plans to attack the US with aircraft months before the strikes happened.

She said the claim by the National Security Adviser, Condoleezza Rice, that there was no such information was "an outrageous lie".

Sibel Edmonds said she spent more than three hours in a closed session with the commission's investigators providing information that was circulating within the FBI in the spring and summer of 2001 suggesting that an attack using aircraft was just months away and the terrorists were in place. The Bush administration, meanwhile, has sought to silence her and has obtained a gagging order from a court by citing the rarely used "state secrets privilege".

She told The Independent yesterday: "I gave [the commission] details of specific investigation files, the specific dates, specific target information, specific managers in charge of the investigation. I gave them everything so that they could go back and follow up. This is not hearsay. These are things that are documented. These things can be established very easily."

She added: "There was general information about the time-frame, about methods to be used ­ but not specifically about how they would be used ­ and about people being in place and who was ordering these sorts of terror attacks. There were other cities that were mentioned. Major cities ­ with skyscrapers."

The accusations from Mrs Edmonds, 33, a Turkish-American who speaks Azerbaijani, Farsi, Turkish and English, will reignite the controversy over whether the administration ignored warnings about al-Qa'ida. That controversy was sparked most recently by Richard Clarke, a former counter-terrorism official, who has accused the administration of ignoring his warnings.

The issue ­ what the administration knew and when ­ is central to the investigation by the 9/11 Commission, which has been hearing testimony in public and private from government officials, intelligence officials and secret sources. Earlier this week, the White House made a U-turn when it said that Ms Rice would appear in public before the commission to answer questions. Mr Bush and his deputy, Dick Cheney, will also be questioned in a closed-door session.

Mrs Edmonds, 33, says she gave her evidence to the commission in a specially constructed "secure" room at its offices in Washington on 11 February. She was hired as a translator for the FBI's Washington field office on 13 September 2001, just two days after the al-Qa'ida attacks. Her job was to translate documents and recordings from FBI wire-taps.

She said said it was clear there was sufficient information during the spring and summer of 2001 to indicate terrorists were planning an attack. "Most of what I told the commission ­ 90 per cent of it ­ related to the investigations that I was involved in or just from working in the department. Two hundred translators side by side, you get to see and hear a lot of other things as well."

"President Bush said they had no specific information about 11 September and that is accurate but only because he said 11 September," she said. There was, however, general information about the use of airplanes and that an attack was just months away.

To try to refute Mr Clarke's accusations, Ms Rice said the administration did take steps to counter al-Qa'ida. But in an opinion piece in The Washington Post on 22 March, Ms Rice wrote: "Despite what some have suggested, we received no intelligence that terrorists were preparing to attack the homeland using airplanes as missiles, though some analysts speculated that terrorists might hijack planes to try and free US-held terrorists."

Mrs Edmonds said that by using the word "we", Ms Rice told an "outrageous lie". She said: "Rice says 'we' not 'I'. That would include all people from the FBI, the CIA and DIA [Defence Intelligence Agency]. I am saying that is impossible."

It is impossible at this stage to verify Mrs Edmonds' claims. However, some senior US senators testified to her credibility in 2002 when she went public with separate allegations relating to alleged incompetence and corruption within the FBI's translation department.



To receive MER regularly and free click here   
If you don't get MER, you just don't get it!

To comment on this and other MER articles click here for the new MER FORUM
MID-EAST REALITIES
www.MiddleEast.Org
Phone:    (202) 362-5266
Fax:    (815) 366-0800
Email:   MER@MiddleEast.Org 

  Copyright © 2004 Mid-East Realities, All rights reserved


Comment on these article(s)