| Email this article | Print this article | Link to this Article|
|The most honest, most comprehensive, and most
mobilizing news and analysis
on the Middle East always comes from
MER. It is indispensable!"
Robert Silverman - Salamanca, Spain
20 June 2001:
_______ ____ ______
/ |/ / /___/ / /_
// M I D - E A S
T R E A L I T I E S
/ /|_/ / /_/_ /
Making Sense of the Middle East
/_/ /_/ /___/ /_/ \\© www.MiddleEast.Org - 6/20/2001
News, Information, & Analysis That Governments, Interest Groups,
and the Corporate Media Don't Want You To Know!
IF YOU DON'T GET MER, YOU JUST DON'T GET IT!
"THE SECOND HALF OF 1948"
THE SHARON-YA'ALON PLAN
By Prof. Tanya Reinhart*
Official declarations and many reports in the Israeli media indicate
that the Israeli military and political leadership are aiming,
eventually, at a total destruction of the Palestinian authority, and,
with it, the process of Oslo, which is now dominantly considered by
them a 'historical mistake'. Let us trace some of the background for
Ever since the 1967 occupation, the military and political elites
(which have been always closely intertwined in Israel) deliberated over
the question of how to keep maximum land with minimum Palestinian
population. The leaders of the '1948 generation' - Alon, Sharon, Dayan,
Rabin and Peres - were raised on the myth of redemption of land. But a
simple solution of annexation of the occupied territories would have
turned the occupied Palestinians into Israeli citizens, and this would
have caused what has been labeled the "demographic problem" - the fear
that the Jewish majority could not be preserved. Therefore, two basic
conceptions were developed.
The Alon plan consisted of annexation of 35-40% of the territories to
Israel, and self-rule or partnership in a confederation of the rest,
the land on which the Palestinians actually live. This plan originated
with those who thought that it is impossible to repeat the 1948
'solution' of mass expulsion, for moral as well as world public opinion
considerations. The second view, whose primary spokesman was Sharon,
assumed that it is possible to find more acceptable and sophisticated
ways to achieve a 1948 style 'solution' - it is only necessary to find
another country for the Palestinians, such as Jordan, and to make sure
that as many as possible of them will move there. This was a part of
Sharon's global worldview by which Israel can establish "new orders" in
the region (see the Lebanon war).
In Oslo, the Alon plan route triumphed, where gradually it became
apparent that it is even possible to extend the "Arab-free" areas. In
practice, the Palestinians have already been dispossessed of half of
their lands, which are now state lands, security zones and "land
reserves for the settlements". However, it appeared that Israel will be
satisfied with that, and will allow the PA to run the enclaves in which
the Palestinians still reside. The security establishment expressed
full confidence in the ability of the Palestinian security forces -
which were created and trained in cooperation with the Israeli ones -
to control the frustration of the Palestinians and protect the security
of the settlers and the Israeli home front.
But the victory of the Alon plan wasn't complete. Even the little that
the Palestinians did get, seemed too much to some in the military
circles, whose most vocal spokesman in the early years of Oslo was then
chief of staff, Ehud Barak. Another consistent voice which has emerged
is that of Brigadier Moshe (Bugi) Ya'alon, who is also known for his
connections with the settlers. As head of the military intelligence
-Ama"n- (1995-1998), Ya'alon confronted the subsequent chief of staff,
Amnon Shahak, an Oslo supporter, and has consolidated the anti-Oslo
line which now dominates the military intelligence view. Contradicting
the Shin Bet position and the many media reports about security
cooperation between Israel and the Palestinian authority, Ya'alon
claimed in a cabinet meeting in September 1997, and later, that "Arafat
is giving a green light to terror".
The objection to the Oslo conception in the military circles was based
on the view that it will be impossible to maintain such an arrangement
in the long term. If the Palestinians have a political infrastructure
and armed forces, they will eventually try to rebel. Therefore, the
only way is to overthrow the Palestinian authority, and the whole Oslo
conception. The first step on this route is to convince the public that
Arafat is still a terrorist and is personally responsible for the acts
of all groups from the Islamic Jihad to Hizbollah.
During Barak's days in office, Ya'alon became one of his closets
confidants in the restricted military team which Barak has assembled to
work with (Amir Oren, Ha'aretz, Nov 17, 00). The same team was prepared
already at the beginning of the Intifada for a total attack on the
Palestinian authority, on both the military and the propaganda levels.
On the later, this included the "White book" on the crimes of Arafat
and the PA. This is the same team which is now briefing the political
level, as well as US representatives, and is responsible for the
dominance of the call for toppling the PA.
In modern times, wars aren't openly started over land and water. In
order to attack, you first need to prove that the enemy isn't willing
to live in peace and is threatening our mere existence. Barak managed
to do that. Now conditions are ripe for executing Sharon's plan, or as
Ya'alon put it in November 2000, for "the second half of 1948". Before
we reach that black line, there is one option which was never tried
before: to leave the occupied territories now.
* Prof. Reinhart is Professor of Linguistics at Tel Aviv University.
This article was published on June 10 in Hebrew by Yediot Aharonot.
The author can be reached at Tanya@MiddleEast.Org
MER articles to others in their entirety with proper
We welcome your comments and information in the new MER FORUM.
Phone: (202) 362-5266
Fax: (815) 366-0800
Copyright © 2004
Mid-East Realities, All rights reserved
| If you don't get
you just don't get it!
MER is free
to subscribe by email
About the new MiddleEast.Org
(June 30, 2004)
U.S. Ordered Brits to Attack Iran - Brits Balked
(June 30, 2004)
The order was given in secret by the U.S. commander in Iraq, General Ricardo Sanchez, who was already scheduled to be replaced, quite likely because of his involvement in the horrendous Iraqi torture scandal. But anyone who thinks General Sanchez gave the order without checking first with his neocon bosses back at the Pentagon -- Wolfowitz and Feith, who then of course check with Rumsfeld who then tells the President, Condi, and Colin -- just doesn't understand even at this late date how the invasion/occupation of Iraq came about nor how the Pentagon planning has been progressing for Iran, Syria, North Korea, just as soon as the excuses can be managed.
Bush and U.S. Exposed - book by book by book
(June 30, 2004)
This list of books exposing the Bush presidency for what it really is all about is an essential corrective to all the propaganda and TV clips constantly bombarding the American people... In many ways though some of these books are more significant, however in a TV/Movie age even collectively they will not have the same impact though they do help set a climate for skepticism and anxiety. This particular list was compiled a few months ago by USA Today so it's hardly complete at this point. But it is a good starting place for those wanting to choose a little holiday reading, however depressive, sometimes shocking, surely politically and historically depressing.
America's Baghdad - Corruption, Barricades, Boozing, Fear and Incompetence
(June 29, 2004)
Baghdad is awash with stories of the corruption, cronyism and incompetence of the US-led Coalition Provisional Authority, which was dissolved this week.
Brits Departed Palestine Leaving Civil War - MER FlashBack
(June 29, 2004)
"Contrary to contemporary assertions, the British and the Americans have done far more to prevent democracy in the Middle East, and to inhibit independent economic development as well, then they will ever admit."
Bremer Slinks Away; CIA Slinks Forward
(June 28, 2004)
Thus now Bremer hastily and rather shamefully
slinks away without much fanfare, a few days
early so they say, even as Iraq continues to
seeth in hatred and a slow-simmer civil war.
(June 28, 2004)
It's historic alright. A huge historic bungle that is quite literally exploding in their faces as they try to appear to go but actually stay with their carefully chosen Iraqi faces now out front. Over the weekend on ABC News one of the neocon political commentators made a little mistake and clearly called the American-appointed 'interim Iraqi Prime Minister' a "CIA agent" -- it was a rare moment of candor in public in today's confused, uptight, and secretive Washington.
Kurds on 'the return' - Palestinians into ghettos
(June 27, 2004)
Substitute "Palestinians" for Kurds, and "Israelis" for Arabs, and there is a whole different twist to 'the return' of the Kurds featured in this front-page New York Times article last Sunday. Another great irony of our times is that even as the Americans and the Israelis help facilitate what the Kurds are doing in Iraq they demand the Palestinians give up their 'right of return' even though it is enshrined in many U.N. Security Council resolutions going back to 1947...
Worst Crisis Since WWII?
(June 26, 2004)
"the most foolhardy civilian leadership in the
modern history of the United States." (Newsweek) "A vacuum has opened up at the heart of world politics where US leadership ought to be found." (Financial Times) "The unpalatable truth is that the Bush administration has failed in almost everything it has touched."
The Historical Moment - MER Flashback Four Years
(June 25, 2004)
MER FLASHBACK to 25 June 2001: Months before what is now known as "9/11" MER published these articles indicating that a major strike by Osama
Bin-Laden against the U.S. was imminent and that the Israelis were more determined than ever to subjugate the Palestinians. We wrote at the time: "In these conditions any spark can ignite the blaze; and sometimes such giant fires consume more than was originally anticipated, sometimes even those who start them."
BBC Hired by British Government to Broadcast TV to Middle East
(June 24, 2004)
More Readers' Comments from Around the World
(June 24, 2004)
Just some of the many Readers's Comments continually pouring in to MER from around the world.
Thank you for previewing the new MiddleEast.Org
(June 23, 2004)
Cheney and Rumseld "linked to murder" of CIA scientist in cold war years
(June 23, 2004)
Secret documents have revealed US Vice President Dick Cheney and Secretary of Defence Donald Rumsfeld are "linked to the murder" of a senior CIA scientist.
It's Now the Second Half of 1948
(June 23, 2004)
As always Professor Tanya Reinhart from Tel Aviv University writes with extraordinary insight.
"...the Israeli military and political leadership are aiming, eventually, at a total destruction of the Palestinian authority, and, with it, the process of Oslo, which is now dominantly considered by them a 'historical mistake'."
Information Warfare - Israel Wins Big
(June 22, 2004)
For 10 years Tim Llewellyn was the BBC's Middle East correspondent. In this passionately argued polemic he accuses British broadcasters, including his former employer, of systematic bias in covering the Arab-Israeli conflict, giving undue prominence to the views of the Israelis while all but disregarding the roots of the crisis and what is being done to the Palestinians.
Gearing Up for IRAN and North Korea
(June 21, 2004)
"...waiting to confront Iraq would have allowed the
United States to confront more immediate dangers....
Because our military is stretched so thin in Iraq, we cannot threaten military action in Iran or North Korea." Martin Peretz and The New Republic
REVOLT in WASHINGTON
(June 20, 2004)
Nader Speaks to Buchanon
(June 15, 2004)
He's going after the real conservative vote, so he says.
Crusade II - Reagan first brought the neocons to power
(June 09, 2004)
Cheney, Wolfowitz, Perle, Abrams, Bush...and the list goes on. Those who have recently led the crusade to invade Iraq, subjugate the Palestinians, and fight Islam, were brought to power in Washington for the first time some 23 years ago when Ronald Reagan of the once far-right was victorious over Jimmy Carter of the once mid-left in American politics. And some now forget that the man who greatly helped bring Ronald Reagan to power was none other than George Herbert Walker Bush, former head of the CIA, who now became Vice-President for the next eight years and then himself succeeded Reagan as President in 1989.
Realities of the "Reagan Plan" for the Middle East
(June 06, 2004)
The seeds for the Intifada and for Israel's increasingly aggressive escalating occupation of and dispossession of the Palestinian people were sown in the years of the Reagan Presidency. Indeed it was Ronald Reagan who first brought what we today call the "neocons" to power in Washington, and the right-wing Republicans who forged such a close alliance with the Israeli Likud of Menachem Begin, Yitzhak Shamir, and Ariel Sharon which had come to power in Israel in 1977 for the first time.