Latest | Recent Articles | Multimedia Page | TV | Search | Blog

Email this article | Print this article | Link to this Article

If you don't get MER, you just don't get it!
(202) 362-5266 - 27 July 2004 - MER@MiddleEast.Org
News, Views, & Analysis Governments, Lobbies, & the
Corporate Media Don't Want You To Know
The most honest, most comprehensive, and most mobilizing news and analysis
on the Middle East always comes from MER. It is indispensable!"
Robert Silverman - Salamanca, Spain
MER is Free
Comment on this and other MER articles in the MER FORUM

Upcoming MER 'Washington Scene' Exclusive:
Sham CNI Exposed

BUSHES and SAUDIS

"To militant Islamic fundamentalists who loathed
pro-West multibillionaire Saudi royals, no one fit
the bill better than (Saudi Ambassador in
Washington Prince) Bandar... Because thousands of
innocent people had been killed and most of the killers
were said to be Saudi, it was up to Bandar, ever the
master illusionist, to assure Americans that everything was
just fine between the US and Saudi Arabia."


"The relationship was unprecedented. Never before had
a president of the United States - much less, two presidents
from the same family - had such close personal and financial
ties to the ruling family of another foreign power."

Mid-East Realities - MER - www.MiddleEast.Org - 27 July 2004:

In the 1980s and 1990s the Saudi Royals and their associated business cronies and oil companies were extra busy throwing around, and in most cases grossly overpaying or wasting, their money in the United States, especially in Washington. The main goal of course was to purchase both influence and protection. The secondary goal was to purchase good 'public relations' by having a cabal of those on the take they could count on for everything from some pro-Saudi spin, to a good Op Ed, to some behind-the-scenes fixes.

As a result the Saudis essentially bought themselves many high-priced lawyers, politicians, and media types -- in addition to all their business and arms industry cronies -- whom they helped set up with various kinds of think-tanks and public relations firms. Among the names of those involved are Fred Dutton, John Duke Anthony, Jim Zogby, United Press International (since sold), Middle East Broadcasting, Al-Hayat, Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, CNI, American Muslim Council, AAI, Jim Akins, Richard Curtiss...and the list goes on and on beyond those in the semi-public eye.

When it comes to politicians, long-time Washington Ambassador Saudi Ambassador Prince Bandar bin-Sultan did all he could to cozy up to those in power -- both Democrats and Republicans at various times -- including trying to forge close relations with key persons associated with the Israeli-Jewish lobby, among them 'his friend' Martin Indyk, one of the top Israeli operatives in Washington.

And so the close Saudi relations with the Bush Family -- after all
Bush Senior was the former head of the CIA, Vice-President for eight crucial years, and then of course President himself at the time of the first Gulf War -- are just a part of this larger mostly untold overall story. But the Bushes, unlike others in Washington, also had their fingers in extensive oil dealings. And then of course who would have imaged back at the time of the first Gulf War that a Bush son would be President of the United States at the time of 11 September 2001, largely with a team of Washington veteran operatives going back as far as Nixon, and then the Reagan and Bush I years.

What the Saudis have done in Washington is not at all the same however as building real power structures which, for instance, is what the truly powerful Israeli-Jewish lobby has done. First of all they squandered much more money and achieved very little lasting results. Secondly they were never seriously interested in anything other than themselves and the perpetuation of their own superwealth and power -- thus for instance serious support for the plight of the Palestinians or for building strong and independent think-tanks and institutions was never part of the Saudi plan. They went about buying up people and things they could control and manipulate, keeping them weak and always awaiting the next check, precisely to be able to keep them under their thumb usually unsure of their actual 'loyalties'.

The unexpected block-buster Michael Moore film has of course exposed some of this story to a wide audience in recent months; and opened the door to far more inquiry and investigations. Fahrenheit 9/11 was itself based partly on the research and book by Craig Unger. This excerpt from Ungar's book, House of Bush - House of Saud, published earlier this month in The Independent in London provides key insights into the historic interconnections between the Bushes and the Sauds -- a reality which had already transformed our world for years and then, through a complex series of connections, actually led to the events of 9/11 and since then to much of its aftermath.



The Biggest Crime in American History
and Planes are Grounded. Yet the
House of Saud Gets Safe Passage Home.

By Craig Unger

Sunday 18 July 2004 - The independent, UK:

The ties between the Bush family and the Saudi royals are revealed in a hard-hitting new book by Craig Unger, a key source for Michael Moore's film 'Fahrenheit 9/11'. Here we print an exclusive extract.

It was the second Wednesday of September 2001. Terrorist attacks had grounded all commercial and private aviation throughout the entire United States for the first time in history. Former vice-president Al Gore was stranded in Austria because his flight to the United States was cancelled. Former president Bill Clinton was stuck in Australia. Major League Baseball games were postponed. American skies were nearly as empty as they had been when the Wright brothers first flew at Kitty Hawk. America was paralysed by terror, and for 48 hours, virtually no one could fly.

No one, that is, except for the Saudis. [In Washington] Prince Bandar bin Sultan bin Abdul Aziz, the Saudi Arabian ambassador to the United States, was orchestrating the exodus of more than 140 Saudis scattered throughout the country. They included members of two families: One was the royal House of Saud, the family that ruled the kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and which, thanks to the country's vast oil reserves, was without question the richest family in the world. The other family was the Sauds' close friends and allies, the Bin Ladens, who in addition to owning a multibillion-dollar construction conglomerate had spawned the notorious terrorist Osama bin Laden.

At 52, Prince Bandar had long been the most recognisable figure from his country in America. Widely known as the Arab Gatsby, with his trimmed goatee and tailored double-breasted suits, Bandar was the very embodiment of the contradictions inherent in being a modern, jet-setting, Western-leaning member of the royal House of Saud.

Profane, flamboyant, and cocksure, Bandar entertained lavishly at his spectacular estates all over the world. When it came to embracing the culture of the infidel West, Bandar outdid even the most ardent admirers of Western civilisation - that was him patrolling the sidelines of Dallas Cowboys football games with his friend Jerry Jones, the team's owner. To militant Islamic fundamentalists who loathed pro-West multibillionaire Saudi royals, no one fit the bill better than Bandar.

And yet, his guise as Playboy of the Western World notwithstanding, deep in his bones, Prince Bandar was a key figure in the world of Islam. His father, defence minister Prince Sultan, was second in line to the Saudi crown, Bandar was the nephew of King Fahd, the ageing Saudi monarch, and the grandson of the late king Abdul Aziz, the founder of modern Saudi Arabia, who initiated his country's historic oil-for-security relationship with the US when he met Franklin D Roosevelt on the USS Quincy in the Suez Canal on 14 February, 1945. The enormous royal family in which Bandar played such an important role oversaw two of the most sacred places of Islamic worship, the holy mosques in Medina and Mecca.

Now, in the immediate aftermath of 9/11, the ugly seams of the relationship [between the US and the House of Saud] had been laid bare. Because thousands of innocent people had been killed and most of the killers were said to be Saudi, it was up to Bandar, ever the master illusionist, to assure Americans that everything was just fine between the US and Saudi Arabia. Bandar had always been a smooth operator, but now he and his unflappable demeanour would be tested as never before.

Bandar desperately hoped that early reports of the Saudi role had been exaggerated - after all, al-Qa'ida terrorist operatives were known to use false passports. But at 10pm on the evening of 12 September, about 36 hours after the attack, a high-ranking CIA official - according to Newsweek magazine, it was probably CIA director George Tenet - phoned Bandar at his home and gave him the bad news: 15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudis. Afterward, Bandar said: "I felt as if the Twin Towers had just fallen on my head." Public relations had never been more crucial for the Saudis. Bandar swiftly retained PR giant Burson-Marsteller to place newspaper ads all over the country condemning the attacks and dissociating Saudi Arabia from them.

But Osama bin Laden was Saudi, of course, and he was not just any Saudi. The Bin Ladens were one of a handful of extremely wealthy families that were so close to the House of Saud that they effectively acted as extensions of the royal family.

Like Bandar, the Bin Laden family epitomised the marriage between the United States and Saudi Arabia. Their huge construction company, the Saudi Binladin Group (SBG), banked with Citigroup and invested with Goldman Sachs and Merrill Lynch. [The family company and various family members use the spelling Binladin rather than Bin Laden, the spelling most frequently used for Osama.] Over time, the Bin Ladens did business with such icons of Western culture as Disney, the Hard Rock Café, Snapple and Porsche. In the mid-Nineties, they joined various members of the House of Saud in becoming business associates with former secretary of state James Baker and former president George Bush by investing in the Carlyle Group, a gigantic Washington, DC-based private equity firm. As Charles Freeman, the former US ambassador to Saudi Arabia, told The Wall Street Journal: "If there were ever any company closely connected to the US and its presence in Saudi Arabia, it's the Saudi Binladin Group."

The Bin Ladens and members of the House of Saud who spent time in the United States were mostly young professionals and students attending high school or college. Many lived in the Boston area, thanks to its high concentration of colleges. One of at least four members of the family to have the name Abdullah bin Laden, a young brother of Osama, was a 1994 graduate of Harvard Law School and had offices in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Several Bin Ladens had attended Tufts University, near Boston. Two Bin Ladens - Mohammed and Nawaf - owned units in the Flagship Wharf condominium complex in Charlestown Navy Yard on Boston Harbor. Some of the young, chic, sophisticated members of the family appeared even more Westernised than Bandar. Wafah Binladin, a 26-year-old graduate of Columbia Law School, lived in a $6,000-a-month rented loft in New York's fashionable SoHo and was considering pursuing a singing career. As for the Saudi royal family, many of them were scattered all over the United States.

Shortly after the attack, one of the Bin Ladens, an unnamed brother of Osama's, frantically called the Saudi embassy in Washington seeking protection. He was given a room at the Watergate Hotel and told not to open the door. King Fahd, the ageing and infirm Saudi monarch, sent a message to his emissaries in Washington. "Take measures to protect the innocents," he said. Meanwhile, a Saudi prince sent a directive to the Tampa Police Department in Florida that young Saudis who were close to the royal family and went to school in the area were in potential danger.

Bandar went to work immediately. If any foreign official had the clout to pull strings at the White House in the midst of a grave national security crisis, it was he. A senior member of the Washington diplomatic corps, Bandar had played racquetball with Secretary of State Colin Powell in the late Seventies. He had run covert operations for the late CIA director Bill Casey that were so hush-hush they were kept secret even from President Ronald Reagan. He was the man who had stashed away 30 locked attaché cases that held some of the deepest secrets in the intelligence world. And for two decades, Bandar had built an intimate personal relationship with the Bush family that went far beyond a mere political friendship.

All over the country, members of the extended Bin Laden family, the House of Saud, and their associates were assembling in various locations. At least eight planes were available for their transportation. Officially, the FBI says that it had nothing to do with the repatriation of the Saudis.

"I can say unequivocally that the FBI had no role in facilitating these flights one way or another," says Special Agent John Iannarelli.

Bandar, however, characterised the role of the FBI very differently. "With coordination with the FBI," he said on CNN, "we got them all out." Meanwhile, the Saudis had at least two of the planes on call to repatriate the Bin Ladens. One of them began picking up family members all across the country. Starting in Los Angeles on an undetermined date, it flew first to Orlando, Florida, where Khalil Binladin, a sibling of Osama bin Laden's, boarded. From Orlando, the plane continued to Dulles International Airport outside Washington, before going on to Logan Airport in Boston on 19 September, picking up members of the Bin Laden family along the way.

As the planes prepared for take-off at each location across the country, the FBI repeatedly got into disputes with Rihab Massoud, Bandar's chargé d'affaires at the Saudi embassy in Washington. "I recall getting into a big flap with Bandar's office about whether they would leave without us knowing who was on the plane," said one former agent who participated in the repatriation of the Saudis. "Bandar wanted the plane to take off and we were stressing that that plane was not leaving until we knew exactly who was on it." In the end, the FBI was able to check papers and identify everyone on the flights. Spokesmen for the FBI assert that the Saudis had every right to leave the country.

The top brass at Logan Airport [in Boston] did not know what was going on. The FBI's counterterrorism unit should have been a leading force in the domestic battle against terror, but here it was not even going to interview the Saudis. [One private jet landed at Logan to pick up more members of the Bin Laden family who wanted to leave.] On September 19, under the cover of darkness, they did.

The Bin Laden family had expressed "the strongest denunciation and condemnation" [of the attacks]. A persuasive case could be made that it was against the interests of the royal family and the Bin Ladens to have aided the terrorists. On the other hand, this was the biggest crime in American history. How is it possible that Saudis were allowed to fly, even when all of America, FBI agents included, was grounded? Had the White House approved the operation - and, if so, why?

When Bandar arrived at the White House on Thursday September 13, 2001, he and President Bush retreated to the Truman Balcony, a casual outdoor spot behind the pillars of the South Portico that also provided a bit of privacy.

The two men lit up Cohiba cigars and began to discuss how they would work together in the war on terror. Bush said that the United States would hand over any captured al-Qa'ida operatives to the Saudis if they would not cooperate. The implication was clear: the Saudis could use any means necessary - including torture - to get the suspects to talk.

But the larger points went unspoken. The two men were scions of the most powerful dynasties in the world. The Bush family and its close associates - the House of Bush, if you will - included two presidents of the United States; former secretary of state James Baker, who had been a powerful figure in four presidential administrations; key figures in the oil and defence industries, the Carlyle Group, and the Republican Party; and much, much more. As for Bandar, his family effectively was the government of Saudi Arabia, the most powerful country in the Arab world. They had hundreds of billions of dollars and the biggest oil reserves in the world. The relationship was unprecedented. Never before had a president of the United States - much less, two presidents from the same family - had such close personal and financial ties to the ruling family of another foreign power.

Yet few Americans realised that these two dynasties, the Bush family and the House of Saud, had a history dating back more than 20 years. Not just business partners and personal friends, the Bushes and the Saudis had pulled off elaborate covert operations and gone to war together. They had shared secrets that involved unimaginable personal wealth, spectacular military might, the richest energy resources in the world.

They had been involved in the Iran-contra scandal, and in secret US aid in the Afghanistan war that gave birth to Osama bin Laden. Along with then vice-president Bush, the Saudis has joined the United States in supporting the brutal Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein for seven full years after knowing that he had used weapons of mass destruction.

In the private sector, the Saudis had supported George W Bush's struggling oil company, Harken Energy, and in the Nineties they made common cause with his father by investing in the Carlyle Group. In the 1991 Gulf War, the Saudis and the elder Bush had fought side by side. And now there was the repatriation of the Bin Ladens, which could not have taken place without approval at the highest levels of the executive branch of President George W Bush's administration.

Only Bush and Bandar know what transpired that day on the Truman Balcony. But the ties between the two families were so strong that allowing the Saudis to leave America would not have been difficult for Bush. It would also have been in character with a relationship in which decisions were often made through elaborate and contrived deniability mechanisms that allowed the principals to turn a blind eye to unseemly realities and to be intentionally "out of the loop". The ties between the two families were an open secret that in some ways was as obvious as the proverbial elephant in the living room. Yet at the same time it was somehow hard to discern even for the most seasoned journalists.

Perhaps that was because the relationship had been forged all over the globe and arced across different eras - from the Reagan-Bush years to the Clinton administration to the presidency of George W Bush.

To understand its scope and its meaning, one would have to search through tens of thousands of forgotten newspaper stories, read scores of books by journalists and historians, and study myriad "secret" classified documents and the records of barely remembered congressional probes of corporate intrigue and Byzantine government scandals. One would have to journey back in the time to the birth of al-Qa'ida at the terrorist training camps during the Afghanistan war. One would have to study the Iran-Iraq War of the Eighties, the 1991 Gulf War, and the Iraq War of 2003. One would have to try to deduce what had happened within the corporate suites of oil barons in Dallas and Houston, in the executive offices of the Carlyle Group, in the Situation Room of the White House, and in the grand royal palaces of Saudi billionaires. One would have to interview scores of politicians, oil executives, counterterrorism analysts, CIA operatives and businessmen from Washington and Saudi Arabia and Texas. One would have to decipher brilliantly hidden agendas and purposefully murky corporate relationships.

Finally, one would have to put all this information together to shape a continuum, a narrative in which the House of Bush and the House of Saud dominated the world stage together in one era after another. Having done so, one would come to a singular inescapable conclusion: namely, that, horrifying as it sounds, the secret relationship between these two great families helped to trigger the Age of Terror and give rise to the tragedy of 9/11.


Comment on this and other MER articles in the MER FORUM

Please forward MER articles to others in their entirety with proper attribution.
We welcome your comments and information in the new MER FORUM.

MID-EAST REALITIES
www.MiddleEast.Org
Phone: (202) 362-5266
Fax: (815) 366-0800
Copyright © 2004 Mid-East Realities, All rights reserved


If you don't get MER,
you just don't get it!

MER is free
Click here to subscribe by email


July 2004


Magazine






Target IRAN
(July 31, 2004)
But regardless of outcome, just as soon as the U.S. election contest is decided, if not before, this huge historic issue looms large for the world. And it may well explain why the Israelis are moving toward a 'National Unity Government' again, something they traditionally do in times of war. Indeed, as these articles suggest, much is already happening to push public opinion, and no doubt behind-the-scenes where the political and military planners really operate there is much planning and anxiety underway.

Bush on Drugs for depression and paranoia?
(July 30, 2004)
"President George W. Bush is taking powerful anti-depressant drugs to control his erratic behavior, depression and paranoia."

Israel expands West Bank settlements and grab still more land
(July 29, 2004)
Months after Ariel Sharon announced his dramatic plan to pull Jewish settlers out of Gaza, portraying it as a sacrifice for peace, the government is grabbing more land for West Bank settlements.

The last 10 exclusive MER articles and FlashBacks.
(July 28, 2004)
These are the last 10 exclusive MER articles and FlashBacks as of 28 July 2004

Arafat's Pickle + Barak's Choking
(July 28, 2004)
Professor Edward Said: "It really doesn't matter whether he declares a Palestinian state or not, because he'll have a state without real borders -- they're controlled by the Israelis -- no real sovereignty, no real country -- it will be cut up into cantons and he won't have east Jerusalem. He won't be able to get rid of the settlers and won't have control over the water, air or sea. Aside from all that, he'll have a state of sorts... [It's] a sign of both exasperation and weakness.'' July 2000

Saudi Money and Influence in Washington
(July 27, 2004)
In the 1980s and 1990s the Saudi Royals and their associated business cronies and oil companies were extra busy throwing around, and in most cases grossly overpaying or wasting, their money in the United States, especially in Washington. The main goal of course was to purchase both influence and protection. The secondary goal was to purchase good 'public relations' by having a cabal of those on the take they could count on for everything from some pro-Saudi spin, to a good Op Ed, to some behind-the-scenes fixes.

Please support MER now
(July 23, 2004)


Roots of Israeli Apartheid
(July 23, 2004)
The roots of what has become Israeli Apartheid and now the widely-condemned nearly 500 kilometer long "Wall" are in this approach to the Palestinians long known as "Revisionism Zionism" and long the underlying philosophy of those who today rule Israel and attempt to speak for American Jewry.

U.S. Presbyterian Church Acts To Divest from Israel
(July 22, 2004)
Finally, one of the Christian denominations in the United States has acted in a principled and courageous way. Will this "most censorious decision ever embraced by any Christian denomination in the United States against Israel" just taken by the American Presbyterian Church now open the door for others to follow?

Israel's Weapons of Mass Destruction
(July 20, 2004)
True to character in contemporary Washington, not one word about how it is Israel's possession of a vast arsenal of nuclear and other weapons of mass destruction, including submarines to deliver these weapons by missile throughout the greater Middle Eastern and south Asian regions, that has greatly fueled the race for such weapons in past decades.

Kerry Pledges More for CIA, Pentagon, Israel
(July 19, 2004)
The Democratic Candidate for President and his top surrogates has not only called for more troops for Iraq Kerry has now called for doubling again the number of CIA agents and spies worldwide. And he's sent his Jewish brother Cam to Israel and American Jews pledging more support for Israel as well.

Allawi shot inmates in cold blood, say witnesses
(July 17, 2004)
Iyad Allawi, the new Prime Minister of Iraq, pulled a pistol and executed as many as six suspected insurgents at a Baghdad police station, just days before Washington handed control of the country to his interim government, according to two people who allege they witnessed the killings.

Iraqi's Uniting in 'War of Liberation' Against American Occupiers
(July 17, 2004)
...a combining of the Iraqi nationalist populations and religious groups in an escalating 'war of liberation' against the U.S. occupying forces of the Pentagon and CIA. This is now the greatest challenge not only to the American occupation but to the essentially puppet government installed with a fast secret hand-shake by Paul Bremer (who then ran even faster to the airport) and now run by disguised remote control by Ambassador Negroponte.

Senior Sunni Cleric Calls for Holy War Against U.S. Occupation Forces
(July 16, 2004)
Of course they'll never say so in the open, but the Americans and the Israelis prefer an Iraqi civil war, or at least the further breakdown of the country into distinct Kurdish, Shiite, and Sunni areas, rather than a combining of the nationalist Shiite and Sunni groups in an escalating war against the U.S. occupying forces of the Pentagon and CIA.

NewsFlash! US-chosen-protected 'Interim Iraqi PM' personally executed six
(July 16, 2004)
The explosive claims in tomorrow's Sydney Morning Herald and Age newspapers allege that the prisoners were handcuffed and blindfolded, lined up against a courtyard wall and shot by the Iraqi Prime Minister. Dr Allawi is alleged to have told those around him that he wanted to send a clear message to the police on how to deal with insurgents. Two people allege they witnessed the killings and there are also claims the Iraqi Interior Minister was present as well as four American security men in civilian dress.

Hitler Name Resurfaces In Washington
(July 16, 2004)
"In a way that occurred before but is rare in the United States...somebody came to power as a result of the illegitimate acts of a legitimate institution that had the right to put somebody in power. That is what the Supreme Court did in Bush versus Gore. It put somebody in power.... That is what happened when Hindenburg put Hitler in." Judge of Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Iraq Teeters
(July 15, 2004)
"The war was fought to weaken Iraq permanently, and if possible to break it up into separate 'statelets', so as to prevent it ever again challenging Israel or US oil and strategic interests in the Gulf."

'What's his accomplishment? That he's no longer an abnoxious drunk?' -Reagan on Bush
(July 14, 2004)
At an unprecedented early stage in the political campaign George Bush has in effect been forced to become his own attack dog. That's because his Vice-President and his Secretary of Defense are already damaged goods...

Emergency U.N. Session Maybe Friday
(July 13, 2004)
The issue is whether the Arabs and those who truly care about justice and international law are finally going to have the guts -- which they have never had in the past in view of threats from the U.S. and Israel what would be done if they dared -- to confront the U.S. in the Security Council and then to demand the General Assembly take the one major action that is within its power, suspension of the G.A. membership of Israel.

Osama Strikes Again
(July 12, 2004)
And now...the truly 'unthinkable' for Americans. From his hideing place whereever that may be Osama Bin Laden has U.S. officials, and now the American people, actually contemplating and chatting about 'postponing' The American election...if... We're now on an 'unthinkable' roll; and much more 'unthinkable' can now be expected in the months and years ahead.

New Version MiddleEast.Org now available
(July 11, 2004)


Covering Up The Truth - The "Intelligence", WMDs, and 9/11 Coverups All Proceed.
(July 11, 2004)
COVERING UP the TRUTH -- The "Intelligence", WMDs, and 9/11 Coverups All Proceed.... "And fourth the U.S. government knew then, and knows now, of the unprecedented level of Israeli-Jewish lobby penetration of key government positions in a way that seriously skews perceived U.S. national interests and security concerns to align with those of Israel."

Israel - Sanctions Now
(July 10, 2004)
But the General Assembly does have a kind of super moral power. It was exercised against South Africa in the days of apartheid. It now should be exercised against Israel. Until there is a real and sovereign Palestinian State, and until Israel's apartheid policies are ended once and for all, the U.N. General Assembly should now act to remove the credentials of the Israeli delegation and suspend Israel from the General Assembly.

CDA - Central Disinformation Agency
(July 9, 2004)
If there is regime change in the U.S., one can bet that much of the most incriminating actual evident, the crucial paper trails, are already being hidden and in the days right after the election will be taken, shredded, and 'disappeared' in one way or another. The top ranging neocons at the Pentagon and the White House, and the Vice-President and his top aides, have the most to fear and no doubt are working overtime to protect their asses.

Top US 'Peace Negotiator' Now Works Directly for Israelis
(July 8, 2004)
Remember now, this is the very same 'Ambassador' Dennis Ross whom the 'even-handed' Americans insisted be the top 'peace process negotiator' for a decade or so between Israel and the Palestinians. Remember as well that the much flaunted and constantly lied about 'peace process' Ross directed erupted in recent years -- as MER had predicted all along by the way -- into the worst mayhem and bloodshed ever. It also has brought worse than apartheid conditions to the Palestinian people and a great escalation in hatred and what the Americans love to simply call 'terrorism' regardless of causes, distinctions, places, and realities.

Amb Dennis Ross, 'Peace Process Chief
(July 8, 2004)
Remember now, this is the very same 'Ambassador' Dennis Ross whom the 'even-handed' Americans insisted be the top 'peace process negotiator' for a decade or so between Israel and the Palestinians. Remember as well that the much flaunted and constantly lied about 'peace process' Ross directed erupted in recent years -- as MER had predicted all along by the way -- into the worst mayhem and bloodshed ever. It also has brought worse than apartheid conditions to the Palestinian people and a great escalation in hatred and what the Americans love to simply call 'terrorism' regardless of causes, distinctions, places, and realities.

Top U.S. 'Peace Process Negotiator' Now Works for Israelis
(July 7, 2004)
Remember now, this is the very same 'Ambassador' Dennis Ross whom the 'even-handed' Americans insisted be the top 'peace process' 'negotiator' for a decade or so between Israel and the Palestinians. Remember as well that the much flaunted and constantly lied about 'peace process' erupted in recent years (as MER had predicted all along by the way) into the worst mayhem and bloodshed ever as well as today's worse than apartheid conditions for the Palestinian people.

Pentagon Neocon Corruption and Israeli-Connections
(July 7, 2004)
The American media, especially the Washington-based American media, isn't going to take on this one about the neocons and the Israeli-Jewish lobby. There will be no Washington Post exposee of this quite possibly worse than Watergate situation. The major foreign media with the resources and manpower now should.

Debacle Looms in both Afghanistan and Iraq
(July 6, 2004)
Everywhere the Bush Administration is proclaiming success and courting disaster. Both the economic and political policies pursued by the U.S. in recent years are heavily mortagaging the future and will make American leadership and supremacy in world affairs far more difficult and costly in the not so distant future. The real price to be paid for all the excesses, all the lies, all the deceptions, all the unprecedented overpaying and overpromising, is not now...but some years ahead for the American Empire.

Saddam's Huge Statue - More Lies and Deceptions
(July 5, 2004)
But now read how this made-for-TV drama was conceived, carried out, and orchestrated by U.S. Marines with, in all likelihood, the advance planning and assistance of the CIA which now has its largest operations station in the world not far from Firdos Square where the huge statue once stood.

"Independence Day" - In the US and Iraq
(July 4, 2004)
It's Independence Day in the USA. But that's little consolidation to the Iraqis, to the Palestinians, or to the Chechnyans or Afghanis and so many other miserably oppressed peoples -- politically, economically, militarily, and culturally -- throughout today's troubled bleeding world.

Amira Hass Speech in Stockholm
(July 3, 2004)
Amira Hass is an extraordinarily courageous Israeli journalist who has lived with and boldly reported about the Palestinian people and Israel's increasingly severe repression and dispossession of them. The above poem by Swedish poet Helga Henschen was chosen to highlight the award.

From Vietnam to Iraq and Abu Ghraib
(July 2, 2004)
Few in Washington these days have time or interest or reason to connect these historical dots. Bbut they are in reality crucial to a full understanding of how things have gotten to where they are...and the direction things are still heading.

Bremer and his 'Israeli Flag' Gone from Iraq
(July 1, 2004)
If these guys have been making policies and decisions about the future of Iraq and the Middle East in the same way they did about a new Iraqi flag....well then the chaos, incompetence, corruption, and miserable failures all need be underscored even more that we had previously realized. And that is saying a lot!

How Bremer Slinked Away on Monday
(July 1, 2004)
But judge for yourself after a little more insight. For real journalism these days is often not what you find on the front-page... Read this inside the paper analysis story about what actually happened in Baghdad on Monday -- not about the tag lines and rhetorical hyperbole the Americans love to sucker the media with. And after doing so it's even harder than ever to imagine this is all going to have a happy ending.




© 2004 Mid-East Realities, All rights reserved