Email this article | Print this article | Link to this Article
If you don't get MER, you just don't
get it!
(202)
362-5266 - 20 July 2004 -
MER@MiddleEast.Org |
News, Views, & Analysis Governments,
Lobbies, & the
Corporate Media Don't Want You To Know |
The most honest, most comprehensive, and most
mobilizing news and analysis
on the Middle East always comes from
MER. It is indispensable!"
Robert Silverman - Salamanca, Spain
MER is
Free
|
|
ISRAEL'S
WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION
Mid-East
Realities - MER - www.MiddleEast.Org - 20 July 2004:
Last week in The Washington Post the
Secretary of Energy, Spencer Abraham, provided a detailed
self-congratulating outline of the Bush Administration's campaign
to "stop nuclear terror".
One of the major aspects of
this campaign post-9/11 is to prevent the leakage of any even low-grade nuclear
materials that could be used for a 'dirty bomb' rather than a
conventional atomic bomb.
True to character in contemporary Washington, not
one word about how it is Israel's possession of a vast arsenal of
nuclear and other weapons of mass destruction, including submarines to
deliver these weapons by missile throughout the greater Middle Eastern
and south Asian regions, that has greatly fueled the race for such
weapons in past decades.
And of course not a word about the huge
contradiction that the U.S. insists other 'lesser' countries now developing
such weapons are 'evil' and must be brought into 'compliance' while
continuing to arm and fund little Israel more than any other country in
the world.
Not a word as well that the U.S. is developing a whole
new generation of strategic and tactical nuclear weapons, including
space-guided weapons and new bunker destroying smart bombs that can
burrow deep underground before the nuclear detonation occurs.
Little of what the Israelis have done in the past, and are doing in the present, could have happened, or could
continue, but for American assistance, funding, and protection of course.
This thoughtful review of "Israel's Weapons of Mass Destruction" comes from the Palestine Monitor and Secretary Abraham's Washington Post Op Ed follows.
|
Israeli Weapons of Mass Destruction
Israel is believed to be the sixth nation in the world and the first in
the Middle East to have developed and acquired nuclear weapons.
For the past forty years, Israel has maintained an ambiguous position
regarding its weapons stockpile, neither confirming nor denying its
existence, however, most experts and non-proliferation analysts agree (1)
that Israel has somewhere in the region of 100 to 200 nuclear warheads.
In addition to this the country is believed to posses a stockpile of
chemical weapons and has an active biological weapons program, which
has developed several weapons agents.
“Israel
follows a policy of what Avner Cohen calls nuclear opacity – visibly
possessing nuclear weapons while denying their existence. This has
allowed Israel to enjoy the benefits of being a nuclear weapons state
in terms of deterrence without having to suffer the international
repercussions of acknowledging their arsenal” (2).
|
The Israeli bomb: historical
background (3)
Plans for a nuclear research
program had been made within a year of the establishment of the Israeli
state in 1948. Due to Israel’s precarious position in the Middle East,
the bomb was considered a centerpiece of its security against hostile
neighbors.
In 1949 Israeli scientists began exploration of the Negev Desert,
finding low-grade uranium deposits near Beersheba. Meanwhile, promising
students were sent abroad to study engineering and physics at Israeli
government expense.
The Israel Atomic Energy Commission (IAEC) was secretly founded in 1952
and placed under the control of the Defense Ministry.
It was France, however, which provided assistance to Israel for the
construction of the first nuclear research reactor at Dimona, in the
Negev Desert. Nuclear cooperation between the two countries, initiated
in the early 1950’s, became problematic when France began to pressure
Israel to make the project public and to submit to international
inspections of the site. After French disengagement in the early
1960's, Israel progressed on its own. (Some believe that French-Israeli
cooperation extended to secret nuclear tests (4)
Lacking uranium reserves – Israel's own uranium sources consist solely
of the small phosphate deposits in the Negev – a new collaboration with
South Africa developed and continued through the 1970s and 1980s,
whereby Israel supplied the technology and expertise for the
''Apartheid Bomb'', and South Africa provided the uranium for Israel’s
Dimona reactor.
A nuclear explosion in the southern Indian Ocean in 1979 was suspected
to be a joint South African-Israeli test.
Israel also obtained uranium oxide, known as yellow cake, from West
Germany (5)
and probably from Portugal.
“The United
States has adopted a nuclear double standard in the Middle East,
acquiescing in the possession of nuclear weapons by Israel while
strongly opposing their possession by its neighbors, with Iran being
the most prominent contemporary example” (6).
|
The US was, from the very beginning, involved in the Israeli nuclear
program, training Israeli scientists and providing technology including
a small research reactor under the ‘’Atoms for Peace’’ program in 1955 (7).
The United States became aware of Dimona's existence after U-2 spy
planes in 1958 captured the facility's construction. Israel initially
said it was a textile plant; two years later US intelligence identified
the site as a nuclear reactor, the C.I.A. voicing concerns that it was
part of a weapons program.
On December 1960, Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion told the Israeli
Parliament that a nuclear reactor was under construction for ''peaceful
purposes'' only.
After refusing to allow regular international inspections, Israel
eventually undertook a commitment with the US to use the facility for
peaceful purposes and to admit an inspection team. These inspections
began in 1962 and continued until 1969, but inspectors reported they
found no evidence of a weapons program. In fact it is now known they
saw only the above ground element of the Dimona complex, the
underground plant was kept hidden during the inspections.
By early 1968, Carl Duckett, head of the C.I.A. directorate of science
and technology, concluded Israel had nuclear weapons, which he
announced in testimony he gave to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission in
1974. Duckett said his assessment was based largely on conversations he
held with Edward Teller, the father of the hydrogen bomb, who visited
Israel several times and supported its nuclear program.
In 1969, President Nixon struck a deal with Israeli Prime Minister
Golda Meir: as long as Israel did not go public with its nuclear
weapons program or test weapons openly, the US would stop its
inspections and turn a blind eye to its program.
”Israeli
impunity relies on America for its sustenance and the nuclear question
is a case of point: US law is very clear in banning foreign aid to
countries that either do not sign or fail to obey the NPT, but somehow
more than $ 3 billion in illegal funds gets from Washington to Israel
every year with nary a world of protest on Capitol Hill” (8). |
Finally the proof: the Vanunu revelations
Israel’s sophisticated nuclear
program was revealed for the first time in 1986 by Israeli nuclear
scientist Mordechai Vanunu. The technician dismissed from Dimona
secretly smuggled photographs and scientific data of the complex out of
Israel, and his story was published in the London Sunday Times (9).
His information led to the conclusion that Israel had produced enough
plutonium for 100/200 nuclear devices since it went on line in 1964,
that the Dimona reactor's capacity had been expanded several fold and
that Israel was producing enough plutonium to make ten to twelve bombs
per year.
Vanunu also exposed the system used to conceal the manufacture of
weapons from US inspectors: a false wall had been built to hide
elevators that descended six stories below ground to where plutonium
was refined and bomb parts manufactured.
Shortly before the article was published, a female agent from Israel's
intelligence service lured Vanunu from London to Rome. He was drugged,
kidnapped and brought back to Israel where he was convicted of treason
by a secret security court and sentenced to 18 years in prison, 11 of
which he spent in isolated confinement. Vanunu is now set for release
next month, 21 April 2004, having completed his entire 18 years
sentence. There have been reports that Israeli Prime minister, Ariel
Sharon, has opted to impose restrictions on Vanunu’s freedom of
movement after his release (10).
To find more information about this important affair and support the
campaign for Vanunu’s release, please visit the website:
http://www.vanunu.freeserve.co.uk
“…debating
the nuclear program is taboo. The Israeli Atomic Energy Commission is
one of the country’s most secretive organizations. Its budget is secret
and its facilities are off limits and employees face harsh sanctions if
they talk about its operations. Even the name of the chief of nuclear
security was a secret until two years ago” (11). |
Israel’s
arsenal of mass destruction (12)
“The Israel arsenal of weapons of mass destruction clearly dwarfs the
actual or potential arsenals of all other Middle Eastern states
combined, and is vastly greater than any conceivable need for
deterrence” (13).
Nuclear
Estimates of the Israeli nuclear arsenal range from 100 to 200 nuclear
warheads; some believe that the arsenal may also include thermonuclear
weapons.
Israel’s nuclear program is centered at the Negev Nuclear Research
Center, outside the town of Dimona (14).
The Dimona site has a plutonium/tritium production reactor, an
underground chemical separation plant and nuclear component fabrication
facilities. The reactor has produced plutonium free from international
controls since 1963.
Israel in not a party to the Non-Proliferation Treaty.
Chemical
There is no confirmed evidence of Israeli production or stockpiling of
such weapons, despite allegations of its possession of a sophisticated
chemical weapons program.
Some reports have suggested an offensive CW program is located at the
Israel Institute for Biological Research in Nes Tziyona.
Production capability for mustard and nerve agents is suspected after
the El Al crash in October 1992 in Amsterdam, led to the discovery of
approximately 50 gallons of dimethyl methylphosphonate (a widely used
stimulant for defensive research but also a possible precursor of sarin
nerve agent) destined for Tel Aviv.
Israel has signed but not ratified the Chemical Weapons Convention.
Biological
While there is no indication of a production effort Israel is widely
thought to possess the ability to produce biological weapons.
Reportedly, extensive research in the field is conducted at the
Biological Research Institute in Nes Tziyona.
Furthermore, the Israeli army is alleged to have poisoned Palestinian
water wells with typhoid and dysentery bacteria during the 1948 war,
but proof of such events is difficult to determine (15).
Israel is not a signatory to the Biological Weapons Convention.
Missiles
Israel’s arsenal comprises ballistic and cruise missiles, unmanned
aerial vehicles (UAV) and the Arrow theater defense missile, one of the
only functioning missile defense systems in the world.
Israel has developed two different kinds of nuclear-capable missile:
The Jericho I, capable of delivering a 750-kilogram warhead a distance
of 235-500 kilometers; and the Jericho II, with 1500 kilometer-range,
long enough to reach the southern border of the Soviet Union. It is
most likely that a Jericho III, with 4.800 kilometer-range, is also
already developed.
In addition, Israel’s successful satellite launches using the Shavit
space launch vehicle (SLV), suggest that Israel could quickly convert
the Shavit into a long-range ballistic missile with an intercontinental
capability of up to 7000 Km, depending on the weight of the warhead.
Israel is not a member of the Missile Technology Control Regime, though
it has pledged to abide by the MTCR Guidelines.
Israel and the International
Law on disarmament (16)
Along with Pakistan and India, Israel remains one of only three
countries that have refused to sign the
Non-Proliferation Treaty (17)
(NPT), the global agreement aimed at stopping the spread of nuclear
weapons through inspections and sanctions. The UN General Assembly and
the International
Atomic Energy Agency (18)
(IAEA) General Conference have adopted 13 resolutions since
1987 appealing Israel to join the Treaty, but all have been ignored.
Israel has signed but not ratified the
Chemical Weapons Convention (19)
(CWC), which prohibits the development, production or
acquiring of chemical weapons and requires those in possession to
destroy existing stocks and production facilities. The CWC contains a
strict mechanism for verifying compliance by states with the provisions
of the convention.
Israel is not a party to the
Biological Weapons Conventions (20)
(BWC), which prohibits the development, production, stockpiling,
acquisition and transfer of pathogens or toxins in types and quantities
that have no justification for prophylactic, protective and other
peaceful purposes. However, the absence of any formal monitoring
mechanism to ensure compliance, and the possibility to use many
biological agents for non-military uses, have limited the effectiveness
of the BWC.
There is no universal treaty specifically governing the development,
deployment or use of missiles. Nonetheless a
Missile Technology Control Regime (21)
(MTCR) was set up in 1987 to control the export of ballistic and cruise
missile technologies capable of delivering nuclear warheads. It is a
voluntary agreement only, and has no enforcement, administrative or
verification structures (22).
Israel, although not a member, has agreed to keep to MTCR guidelines.
The Comprehensive
Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (23)
(CTBT), which bans all nuclear test explosions, for military or civil
purposes, has not yet entered into force. Israel signed the treaty in
1996, but not ratified.
“Possessing
chemical and biological weapons, an extremely sophisticated nuclear
arsenal, and an aggressive strategy for their actual use, Israel
provides the major regional impetus for the development of weapons of
mass destruction and represents an acute threat to peace and stability
in the Middle East” (24). |
Endnotes
(1) Precise assessment of a state's
capabilities is difficult because most weapons of mass destruction
programs remain secret and cannot be verified independently.
(2) Federation of American Scientists
http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/israel/doctrine/index.html
(3) Avner Cohen “Israel and the bomb”,
1998,
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/israel/
Avner Cohen “Most
favored nation”, 1995,
http://www.thebulletin.org/issues/1995/jf95/jf95Cohen.html
Warner D. Farr “The
Third Temple’s Holy of Holies: Israel’s nuclear weapons”, 1999,
http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/cpc-pubs/farr.htm
Federation of American
Scientists, 2000,
http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/israel/nuke/index.html
(4) Allegedly, underground tests were
conducted in the Negev in 1963 and at Al-Naqab, Negev, in October 1966.
(5) Reportedly, I n 1964, Israel
obtained 200 tons of yellow cake from West Germany.
(6) Marvin Miller and Lawrence
Scheinman “Israel, India and Pakistan: engaging the non-NPT States in
the Non-Proliferation Treaty”, December 2003
http://www.armscontrol.org/act/2003_12/MillerandScheinman.asp
(7) Under a now expired bilateral
cooperation agreement, the US supplied a research reactor to Israel at
the Nahal Soreq Nuclear Research Center. The reactor, which should be
used solely for civil purposes, is under IAEA safeguards.
(8) The Daily Star, 16/07/2003.
(9) London Sunday Times, 12 October
1986.
(10) Haaretz, 27 February 2004,
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/398836.html
(11) Dougles Frantz ‘’Israel extends
nuclear weapons capability’’, Los Angeles Times, 11 October 2003.
(12) Monterey Institute of
International Studies
http://cns.miis.edu/research/wmdme/israel.htm
Nuclear Threat
Initiative (a US-based think-tank)
http://www.nti.org/e_research/e1_israel_1.html#nuclear
Federation of American
Scientists
http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/israel
Center for Strategic
and International Studies (CSIS)
http://www.csis.org/mideast/stable/3h.html
(13) John Steinbach “Israeli weapons of
mass destruction: a threat to peace”, 2002,
http://www.wagingpeace.org/articles/2002/03/00_steinbach_israeli-wmd.htm
(14) To see a map of Israel’s nuclear
sites click here
(15)
http://www.nti.org/e_research/e1_israel_1.html; Avner Cohen ’’Israel
and Chemical/Biological Weapons: History, deterrence and Arms
Controls“, pp 31-32 http://cns.miis.edu/pubs/npr/vol08/83/83cohen.pdf ;
Salman Abu-Sitta ’’Traces of poison’’
http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2003/627/focus.htm
(16) United Nation’s website on Weapons
of Mass Destruction
http://disarmament2.un.org/wmd/
(17) The NPT, whose objective is to
prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and weapons technology, to
promote cooperation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy and to
further the goal of achieving general and complete disarmament, was
opened for signature in 1968 and entered into force in 1970.
(18) The International Atomic Energy
Agency is the world's center of cooperation in the nuclear field. It
has the responsibility to verify compliance of member states with the
NPT and to promote cooperation in the field of peaceful nuclear
technology.
(19) The CWC opened for signature on 13
January 1993 and entered into force on 29 April 1997. Significant
non-signing states include Egypt, Iraq, Libya, North Korea, Syria and
Yugoslavia.
(20) The BWC, which incorporate the
1925 Geneva Protocol banning "bacteriological methods of warfare", was
opened for signature on 10 April 1972 and entered into force on 26
March 1975. Egypt, Syria and the United Arab Emirates have signed but
not ratified the Convention.
(21) MTCR membership now consists of
most states capable of developing missiles with a range of over 300 Km.
Notable exceptions include India, Iran, Iraq, Libya, North Korea and
Pakistan.
(22) For more information, visit
http://www.nti.org/f_wmd411/mtcr.html
(23) The CTBT was opened for signature
on 24 September 1996. It will enter into force 180 days after 44
nuclear-capable States, identified in a list annexed to the treaty,
have ratified it.
(24) John Steinbach “Israeli Weapons of
Mass Destruction: a Threat to Peace”, March 2002.
Last Updated March 2004 - Palestine Monitor
How to Stop Nuclear Terror
By Spencer Abraham*
Washington Post - Saturday, July 17, 2004; Page A19: The collapse of Soviet communism was the greatest advance for the cause
of freedom in the late 20th century, but it left behind a legacy that
could complicate the 21st century struggle to overcome terrorism. While
the United States and Russia work to dismantle nuclear arsenals,
terrorists and rogue states are seeking to obtain materials -- from
former Cold War armaments and other sources -- to make nuclear weapons
and "dirty bombs."
Securing this nuclear and radiological
material is a top priority for the United States, Russia and many other
nations. While much of it is concentrated in the former Soviet states,
it is also found in other countries around the world. It constitutes a
formidable threat if it falls into the wrong hands.
In the
early aftermath of the Cold War, nuclear nonproliferation programs were
appropriately focused on reducing and securing nuclear weapons and
weapons material in the former Soviet Union. In 2001 President Bush
broadened and accelerated these programs. Both he and Russian President
Vladimir Putin have made nonproliferation a personal priority. The
United States has developed much better working relationships with our
counterparts in the Russian government, and we have been successful in
bringing other countries into the effort.
President Bush's
most recent budget request for the Department of Energy calls for $1.35
billion for the Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Program -- nearly 75
percent more than the largest budget request of the previous
administration -- and we have shortened the timetables and expanded the
scope of many important nonproliferation programs.
The
Department of Energy has accelerated efforts to secure 600 metric tons
of weapons-usable material in Russia. By the end of this fiscal year,
we will have secured more than 46 percent of this material, and in 2003
and 2004 we will have secured more of it than in any two-year period.
We will finish this work by 2008, two years ahead of the schedule we
inherited.
We have accelerated the recovery of about 10,000
high-risk radiological sources in the United States. We have helped the
Russian navy secure its nuclear fuel and warhead sites much faster than
originally planned, and have accelerated similar work at other military
sites. We are installing nuclear detection equipment at international
ports, airports and border crossings, and are working with the
International Atomic Energy Agency on initiatives to locate and secure
weapons-usable material around the world.
In the spring of
last year, the Energy Department began a new program with Russia to
upgrade security for its strategic rocket forces sites. By the end of
this year, we will have secured two sites, and we are working to secure
the remaining 15 by the end of 2008.
Other U.S. initiatives
include the Global Partnership Against the Spread of Weapons and
Materials of Mass Destruction, which President Bush called for and the
G-8 leaders adopted. This 10-year program has brought new resources to
bear and is engaging additional nations in nonproliferation efforts.
The partnership already has secured almost $17 billion in pledges
toward our target of at least $20 billion -- a figure we believe should
be a floor, not a ceiling.
We are moving aggressively
forward with these and many other programs, but we would be fooling
ourselves, and endangering our citizens, to say we have done enough.
This is why, in May in Vienna, the United States proposed the Global
Threat Reduction Initiative to secure, remove or dispose of an even
broader range of nuclear and radiological materials around the world.
Under
this initiative, we will work in partnership with Russia to recover
nuclear fuel of Russian origin from research reactors around the world
and repatriate it to Russia for safe storage or disposition. We seek to
do this not in three years, or five years, or eight but by late next
year. We are also working to repatriate all Russian-origin spent
high-enriched uranium fuel by 2009. At present about four metric tons
of this spent fuel are at 20 reactors in 17 countries.
A
second feature of this initiative is completing the repatriation of
U.S.-origin high-enriched uranium spent fuel from research reactors --
about 40 metric tons in more than 40 locations around the world. This
effort involves a number of diplomatic and legal challenges, but we
believe most of the fuel can be repatriated in four to five years.
A
third feature will be converting the cores of 105 civilian research
reactors that use high-enriched uranium fuel to instead use
low-enriched fuel. About one-third of the reactors are in the process
of being converted or already have been converted, and we expect to
finish another one-third in three to five years. The final one-third
could be more difficult.
While we have developed
low-enriched uranium fuel that works for some reactors, it does not
work for others -- and developing a suitable fuel for these reactors
will take time. Until a new fuel is available, some nations will be
reluctant to give up the use of their research reactors. We have top
scientists hard at work developing a substitute fuel, and they are
making progress. In the meantime, critics who question our pace or
commitment do not understand the technical realities or are choosing to
ignore them.
The final pillar of the initiative is to
identify nuclear materials and equipment not yet covered by existing
programs and secure those materials and equipment as safely and quickly
as possible.
With all these initiatives and other efforts
across the government, President Bush is pursuing the most aggressive
nonproliferation effort in history. Four years ago there was no
comprehensive international effort to address radiological dispersal
devices. Today there is. Four years ago there was no program to place
radiation detection equipment at the world's major shipping ports.
Today there is. Four years ago, there was no formal agreement to return
Russian-origin spent high-enriched uranium reactor fuel to Russia.
Today there is. Most important: Four years ago there was no G-8 global
partnership with $20 billion in commitments for nonproliferation. But
today, those programs are in place.
Securing nuclear and
radiological materials is one of our highest priorities and greatest
responsibilities in the battle against terror. The United States will
continue to intensify its efforts to keep a legacy of the Cold War from
becoming a tool of the enemies of freedom.
* The writer is U.S. secretary of energy.
Comment
on this and other MER articles in the MER FORUM
Please forward
MER articles to others in their entirety with proper
attribution.
We welcome your comments and information in the new MER FORUM.
MID-EAST
REALITIES
www.MiddleEast.Org
Phone: (202) 362-5266
Fax: (815) 366-0800
Copyright © 2004
Mid-East Realities, All rights reserved
|
|
|
If you don't get
MER,
you just don't get it!
MER is free
Click
here
to subscribe by email
|
|
|
July 2004
Target IRAN (July 31, 2004)
But regardless of outcome, just as soon as the U.S. election contest is decided, if not before, this huge historic issue looms large for the world. And it may well explain why the Israelis are moving toward a 'National Unity Government' again, something they traditionally do in times of war. Indeed, as these articles suggest, much is already happening to push public opinion, and no doubt behind-the-scenes where the political and military planners really operate there is much planning and anxiety underway.
Bush on Drugs for depression and paranoia? (July 30, 2004)
"President George W. Bush is taking powerful
anti-depressant drugs to control his erratic behavior, depression and paranoia."
Israel expands West Bank settlements and grab still more land (July 29, 2004)
Months after Ariel Sharon announced his dramatic plan to pull Jewish settlers out of Gaza, portraying it as a sacrifice for peace, the government is grabbing more land for West Bank settlements.
The last 10 exclusive MER articles and FlashBacks. (July 28, 2004)
These are the last 10 exclusive MER articles and FlashBacks as of 28 July 2004
Arafat's Pickle + Barak's Choking (July 28, 2004)
Professor Edward Said: "It really doesn't matter whether he declares a Palestinian state or not, because he'll have a state without real borders -- they're controlled by the Israelis -- no real
sovereignty, no real country -- it will be cut up into cantons and he won't have east Jerusalem. He won't be able to get rid of the settlers and won't have control over the water, air or sea. Aside from all that, he'll have a state of sorts... [It's] a sign of both exasperation and weakness.''
July 2000
Saudi Money and Influence in Washington (July 27, 2004)
In the 1980s and 1990s the Saudi Royals and their associated business cronies and oil companies were extra busy throwing around, and in most cases grossly overpaying or wasting, their money in the United States, especially in Washington. The main goal of course was to purchase both influence and protection. The secondary goal was to purchase good 'public relations' by having a cabal of those on the take they could count on for everything from some pro-Saudi spin, to a good Op Ed, to some behind-the-scenes fixes.
Please support MER now (July 23, 2004)
Roots of Israeli Apartheid (July 23, 2004)
The roots of what has become Israeli Apartheid and now the widely-condemned nearly 500 kilometer long "Wall" are in this approach to the Palestinians long known as "Revisionism Zionism" and long the underlying philosophy of those who today rule Israel and attempt to speak for American Jewry.
U.S. Presbyterian Church Acts To Divest from Israel (July 22, 2004)
Finally, one of the Christian denominations in the United States has acted in a principled and courageous way. Will this "most censorious decision ever embraced by any Christian denomination in the United States against Israel" just taken by the American Presbyterian Church now open the door for others to follow?
Israel's Weapons of Mass Destruction (July 20, 2004)
True to character in contemporary Washington, not one word about how it is Israel's possession of a vast arsenal of nuclear and other weapons of mass destruction, including submarines to deliver these weapons by missile throughout the greater Middle Eastern and south Asian regions, that has greatly fueled the race for such weapons in past decades.
Kerry Pledges More for CIA, Pentagon, Israel (July 19, 2004)
The Democratic Candidate for President and his top surrogates has not only called for more troops for Iraq Kerry has now called for doubling again the number of CIA agents and spies worldwide. And he's sent his Jewish brother Cam to Israel and American Jews pledging more support for Israel as well.
Allawi shot inmates in cold blood, say witnesses (July 17, 2004)
Iyad Allawi, the new Prime Minister of Iraq, pulled a pistol and executed as many as six suspected insurgents at a Baghdad police station, just days before Washington handed control of the country to his interim government, according to two people who allege they witnessed the killings.
Iraqi's Uniting in 'War of Liberation' Against American Occupiers (July 17, 2004)
...a combining of the Iraqi nationalist populations and religious groups in an escalating 'war of liberation' against the U.S. occupying forces of the Pentagon and CIA. This is now the greatest challenge not only to the American occupation but to the essentially puppet government installed with a fast secret hand-shake by Paul Bremer (who then ran even faster to the airport) and now run by disguised remote control by Ambassador Negroponte.
Senior Sunni Cleric Calls for Holy War Against U.S. Occupation Forces (July 16, 2004)
Of course they'll never say so in the open, but the Americans and the Israelis prefer an Iraqi civil war, or at least the further breakdown of the country into distinct Kurdish, Shiite, and Sunni areas, rather than a combining of the nationalist Shiite and Sunni groups in an escalating war against the U.S. occupying forces of the Pentagon and CIA.
NewsFlash! US-chosen-protected 'Interim Iraqi PM' personally executed six (July 16, 2004)
The explosive claims in tomorrow's Sydney Morning Herald and Age newspapers allege that the prisoners were handcuffed and blindfolded, lined up against a courtyard wall and shot by the Iraqi Prime Minister. Dr Allawi is alleged to have told those around him that he wanted to send a clear message to the police on how to deal with insurgents. Two people allege they witnessed the killings and there are also claims the Iraqi Interior Minister was present as well as four American security men in civilian dress.
Hitler Name Resurfaces In Washington (July 16, 2004)
"In a way that occurred before but is rare in the United States...somebody came to power as a result of the illegitimate acts of a legitimate institution that had the right to put somebody in power. That is what the Supreme Court did in Bush versus Gore. It put somebody in power.... That is what happened when Hindenburg put Hitler in."
Judge of Second Circuit Court of Appeals
Iraq Teeters (July 15, 2004)
"The war was fought to weaken Iraq permanently, and
if possible to break it up into separate 'statelets', so as to prevent it ever again challenging Israel or US oil and strategic interests in the Gulf."
'What's his accomplishment? That he's no longer an abnoxious drunk?' -Reagan on Bush (July 14, 2004)
At an unprecedented early stage in the political campaign George Bush has in effect been forced to become his own attack dog. That's because his Vice-President and his Secretary of Defense are already damaged goods...
Emergency U.N. Session Maybe Friday (July 13, 2004)
The issue is whether the Arabs and those who truly care about justice and international law are finally going to have the guts -- which they have never had in the past in view of threats from the U.S. and Israel what would be done if they dared -- to confront the U.S. in the Security Council and then to demand the General Assembly take the one major action that is within its power, suspension of the G.A. membership of Israel.
Osama Strikes Again (July 12, 2004)
And now...the truly 'unthinkable' for Americans. From his hideing place whereever that may be Osama Bin Laden has U.S. officials, and now the American people, actually contemplating and chatting about 'postponing' The American election...if...
We're now on an 'unthinkable' roll; and much more 'unthinkable' can now be expected in the months and years ahead.
New Version MiddleEast.Org now available (July 11, 2004)
Covering Up The Truth - The "Intelligence", WMDs, and 9/11 Coverups All Proceed. (July 11, 2004)
COVERING UP the TRUTH -- The "Intelligence", WMDs, and 9/11 Coverups All Proceed.... "And fourth the U.S. government knew then, and knows now, of the unprecedented level of Israeli-Jewish lobby penetration of key government positions in a way that seriously skews perceived U.S. national interests and security concerns to align with those of Israel."
Israel - Sanctions Now (July 10, 2004)
But the General Assembly does have a kind of super moral power. It was exercised against South Africa in the days of apartheid. It now should be exercised against Israel. Until there is a real and sovereign Palestinian State, and until Israel's apartheid policies are ended once and for all, the U.N. General Assembly should now act to remove the credentials of the Israeli delegation and suspend Israel from the General Assembly.
CDA - Central Disinformation Agency (July 9, 2004)
If there is regime change in the U.S., one can bet that much of the most incriminating actual evident, the crucial paper trails, are already being hidden and in the days right after the election will be taken, shredded, and 'disappeared' in one way or another. The top ranging neocons at the Pentagon and the White House, and the Vice-President and his top aides, have the most to fear and no doubt are working overtime to protect their asses.
Top US 'Peace Negotiator' Now Works Directly for Israelis (July 8, 2004)
Remember now, this is the very same 'Ambassador' Dennis Ross whom the 'even-handed' Americans insisted be the top 'peace process negotiator' for a decade or so between Israel and the Palestinians. Remember as well that the much flaunted and constantly lied about 'peace process' Ross directed erupted in recent years -- as MER had predicted all along by the way -- into the worst mayhem and bloodshed ever. It also has brought worse than apartheid conditions to the Palestinian people and a great escalation in hatred and what the Americans love to simply call 'terrorism' regardless of causes, distinctions, places, and realities.
Amb Dennis Ross, 'Peace Process Chief (July 8, 2004)
Remember now, this is the very same 'Ambassador' Dennis Ross whom the 'even-handed' Americans insisted be the top 'peace process negotiator' for a decade or so between Israel and the Palestinians. Remember as well that the much flaunted and constantly lied about 'peace process' Ross directed erupted in recent years -- as MER had predicted all along by the way -- into the worst mayhem and bloodshed ever. It also has brought worse than apartheid conditions to the Palestinian people and a great escalation in hatred and what the Americans love to simply call 'terrorism' regardless of causes, distinctions, places, and realities.
Top U.S. 'Peace Process Negotiator' Now Works for Israelis (July 7, 2004)
Remember now, this is the very same 'Ambassador' Dennis Ross whom the 'even-handed' Americans insisted be the top 'peace process' 'negotiator' for a decade or so between Israel and the Palestinians. Remember as well that the much flaunted and constantly lied about 'peace process' erupted in recent years (as MER had predicted all along by the way) into the worst mayhem and bloodshed ever as well as today's worse than apartheid conditions for the Palestinian people.
Pentagon Neocon Corruption and Israeli-Connections (July 7, 2004)
The American media, especially the Washington-based American media, isn't going to take on this one about the neocons and the Israeli-Jewish lobby. There will be no Washington Post exposee of this quite possibly worse than Watergate situation. The major foreign media with the resources and manpower now should.
Debacle Looms in both Afghanistan and Iraq (July 6, 2004)
Everywhere the Bush Administration is proclaiming success and courting disaster. Both the economic and political policies pursued by the U.S. in recent years are heavily mortagaging the future and will make American leadership and supremacy in world affairs far more difficult and costly in the not so distant future. The real price to be paid for all the excesses, all the lies, all the deceptions, all the unprecedented overpaying and overpromising, is not now...but some years ahead for the American Empire.
Saddam's Huge Statue - More Lies and Deceptions (July 5, 2004)
But now read how this made-for-TV drama was conceived, carried out, and orchestrated by U.S. Marines with, in all likelihood, the advance planning and assistance of the CIA which now has its largest operations station in the world not far from Firdos Square where the huge statue once stood.
"Independence Day" - In the US and Iraq (July 4, 2004)
It's Independence Day in the USA. But that's little consolidation to the Iraqis, to the Palestinians, or to the Chechnyans or Afghanis and so many other miserably oppressed peoples -- politically, economically, militarily, and culturally -- throughout today's troubled bleeding world.
Amira Hass Speech in Stockholm (July 3, 2004)
Amira Hass is an extraordinarily courageous Israeli journalist who has lived with and boldly reported about the Palestinian people and Israel's increasingly severe repression and dispossession of them. The above poem by Swedish poet Helga Henschen was chosen to highlight the award.
From Vietnam to Iraq and Abu Ghraib (July 2, 2004)
Few in Washington these days have time or interest or reason to connect these historical dots. Bbut they are in reality crucial to a full understanding of how things have gotten to where they are...and the direction things are still heading.
Bremer and his 'Israeli Flag' Gone from Iraq (July 1, 2004)
If these guys have been making policies and decisions about the future of Iraq and the Middle East in the same way they did about a new Iraqi flag....well then the chaos, incompetence, corruption, and miserable failures all need be underscored even more that we had previously realized. And that is saying a lot!
How Bremer Slinked Away on Monday (July 1, 2004)
But judge for yourself after a little more insight. For real journalism these days is often not what you find on the front-page... Read this inside the paper analysis story about what actually happened in Baghdad on Monday -- not about the tag lines and rhetorical hyperbole the Americans love to sucker the media with. And after doing so it's even harder than ever to imagine this is all going to have a happy ending.
|